Natomas High: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Natomas posts 25% meeting the standard and 5.2% exceeding it, against 36% and 15.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 36 | 5% | 25% | 91.2% | 20.2% | 23.1% | 8.3% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Natomas High scores 36 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 31st percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “25% proficient” and call it done. Natomas deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sacramento, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 31st percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 25% meet the standard today, versus 29% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 48% | 35% | 35% | 40% | 41% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 9% | 6% | 4% | 8% | 9% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 25 are proficient by 11th grade → 91 graduate → 20 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Natomas High in Sacramento, 43.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Natomas High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (7.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (39.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 35.0 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 178 students tested.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$367 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 13% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Natomas High a good high school?
What are Natomas High's CAASPP test scores?
How does Natomas High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Natomas High?
How does Natomas High compare to other schools in Sacramento?
How does Natomas High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 45
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 53
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 233 | 9% | 32% | 29% | 30% | 41% | −6 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 233 | 1% | 8% | 22% | 69% | 9% | −14 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 441 | 2% | 11% | 71% | 17% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 178 | 43.3% | +12 | +5 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 122 | 39.3% | +3 | +0 |
| English Learners | 42 | 9.5% | −3 | −1 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natomas High ← | — | 36 | 5.2% | 25.1% | — | 8.3% |
| Washington Middle College High | 3 mi | 55 | 30.6% | 65.3% | — | 1.1% |
| Inderkum High | 2.4 mi | 49 | 18.6% | 40.8% | — | 3.7% |
| SAVA - Sacramento Academic and Vocational Academy | 1.2 mi | 31 | 4.7% | 16.3% | — | 2.8% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 40 | 37 | #1278 | 10.2% | 28.7% | 17.0% | 8.9% | — |
| 2022 | 34 | 30 | #1461 | 6.6% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 12.2% | — |
| 2023 | 34 | 30 | #1498 | 4.5% | 19.9% | 30.3% | 10.8% | — |
| 2024 | 37 | 33 | #1428 | 7.8% | 24.0% | 27.3% | 8.2% | — |
| 2025 | 36 | 31 | #1484 | 5.2% | 25.1% | 23.1% | 8.3% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 20.0% | 21.7% | +1.7pp |
| Male | 12.9% | 23.4% | +10.5pp |
| Asian | 12.9% | 20.3% | +7.4pp |
| Black/African American | 18.0% | 26.5% | +8.5pp |
| White | 15.0% | 20.0% | +5.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 13.8% | 21.8% | +8.0pp |
| Pacific Islander | 14.3% | 26.1% | +11.8pp |
| Two or More Races | 26.5% | 22.6% | -3.9pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 19.8% | 26.4% | +6.6pp |
| English Learners | 11.4% | 23.4% | +12.0pp |
| Homeless | 23.5% | 37.5% | +14.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 16.2% | 23.6% | +7.4pp |
| All Students | 16.4% | 22.6% | +6.2pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction