ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Sacramento

Natomas Charter: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Natomas Charter posts 37.0% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

2920 Advantage Way, 95834 (opens in new tab)·Natomas Unified·Sacramento·Grades K-12·1,850 students·40% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 419-3788·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Scope Score
66
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #692 statewide · #2 of 13 in Natomas Unified

Natomas Charter scores 66 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 88th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “63% proficient” and call it done. Natomas Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sacramento, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: +3.0pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.

As a charter, Natomas Charter enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

32%
31%
37%
Grade 3 · 63% proficient
49%
17%
34%
Grade 4 · 66% proficient
48%
27%
25%
Grade 5 · 75% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 15.9pp across grades; the floor rises 12.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

55.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Natomas Charter's most underrated number

55.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Natomas Charter low-income: 55.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
37.0%
State 21.3%
15.7pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
62.6%
State 42.7%
20.0pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+3.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Chronic absenteeism
4.2%
State 17.9%
13.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.0%
State 1.6%
0.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Path

Natomas Charter serves grades K-12 — students can complete their entire K-12 education here.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic29.2%
White19.4%
Asian18.2%
Black10.6%
Other22.6%
GenderFemale 56.3%Male 43.7%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 39.8% (24pp below CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
1,850
650 above CA avg (~1,200)
Transitional Kindergarten
TK status unconfirmed
No TK enrollment is on file with the state for this school — that isn't the same as “no TK.” Confirm directly with the district.
Student-Teacher Ratio
24:1
3 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$12,925
CA avg: $14,815 · District avg · NCES F-33
Teacher Salary Range
$56,265 – $121,338
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Natomas Charter in Sacramento, 55.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Natomas Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 24.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (59.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 420 students tested.
Equity Gaps
ELA · Disabilities−38.3pp
28.8% vs 67.1% overall · n=58
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Disabilities−22.4pp
11.4% vs 33.8% overall · n=58
Math · Disabilities−26.9pp
16.6% vs 43.5% overall · n=58
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−16.3pp
3.8% vs 20.1% overall · n=58

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income420 tested
ELA 55.0%·Math 27.4%· +24.0pp vs district
Hispanic318 tested
ELA 59.4%·Math 30.6%· +23.4pp vs district
White206 tested
ELA 72.8%·Math 44.7%· +14.3pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 18.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.4pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 64%Support 33%Other 3%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$101K
$16K above CA median
Median Home Value
$558K
$101K below CA median
Bachelor's+
41%
6pp above CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
11.3 years avg experience
82 teachers · 6% second-year
Teacher Credentials
79% fully credentialed
4.2% on intern/emergency permit

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →
For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
37.0%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 65th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
62.6%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 65th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 15%
+3.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 71th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
4.2%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 72th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.0%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 55th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310432%31%20%17%63%+19
Grade 410649%17%16%18%66%+21
Grade 510748%27%19%7%75%+27
Grade 620125%39%19%16%65%+18
Grade 720426%39%22%13%65%+18
Grade 820518%41%31%10%59%+13
Grade 1113141%37%15%7%79%+31
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310426%34%22%18%60%+14
Grade 410635%25%26%14%59%+18
Grade 510733%21%30%17%53%+18
Grade 620014%25%31%31%39%+3
Grade 720413%19%42%27%31%−3
Grade 820512%18%29%41%30%−3
Grade 1113111%24%31%34%35%+12
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1144415%28%52%5%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged42055.0%+24+17
Hispanic/Latino31859.4%+23+21
White20672.8%+14+11
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Natomas Charter ←6637.0%62.6%+3.01.0%
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Elementary1.1 mi6638.9%70.4%−5.60.1%
Heron1.4 mi5028.0%54.9%−4.06.1%
Northlake TK-81.6 mi4834.4%58.5%−22.23.2%
California average4321.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
53%66%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #1500 → #1155 → #827 → #798 → #692
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

Frequently asked questions

Is Natomas Charter a good elementary school?
Natomas Charter has a Scope Score of 66 out of 100, placing it in the 88th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #692 statewide. 37.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 15.7 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Natomas Charter's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 62.6% of students at Natomas Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 37.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.6% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 37.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 634 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Natomas Charter rank in California?
Natomas Charter ranks #692 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 88th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Natomas Charter getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Natomas Charter increases by 3.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Natomas Charter?
4.2% of students at Natomas Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.0%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Natomas Charter compare to other schools in Sacramento?
Natomas Charter scores 66/100 (88th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,850 students. Use the schools in Sacramento page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Natomas Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Natomas Charter in Sacramento, 55.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Natomas Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 24.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (27.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (59.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 420 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.