Leroy Greene Academy: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Leroy Greene Academy posts 34% meeting the standard and 11.4% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 37 | 11% | 34% | -3.1 | 11.1% | 8.8% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Leroy Greene Academy scores 37 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 40th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “34% proficient” and call it done. Leroy Greene Academy deserves a closer read. The school sits in Sacramento, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
As a charter, Leroy Greene Academy enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
The seven-year arc
Slipped from the 52nd to the 40th percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 34% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 38% | 42% | 33% | 29% | 40% |
| Grade 7 | 51% | 42% | 59% | 47% | 46% |
| Grade 8 | 47% | 40% | 36% | 52% | 42% |
| Grade 11 | 58% | 62% | 46% | 54% | 64% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 18% | 34% | 13% | 22% | 31% |
| Grade 7 | 28% | 17% | 42% | 23% | 26% |
| Grade 8 | 30% | 10% | 18% | 31% | 22% |
| Grade 11 | 18% | 23% | 18% | 19% | 15% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 7.0pp across grades; the floor rises 2.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Leroy Greene Academy in Sacramento, 40.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Leroy Greene Academy outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (20.9% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 288 students tested.
6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.8pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +2.3pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Grades 9–12 students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (13.6% vs 7.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
Where the path goes
Leroy Greene Academy serves grades 6-12 — students can complete middle and high school here, without a separate middle-to-high transition.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1,412 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 28% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Leroy Greene Academy a good middle school?
What are Leroy Greene Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does Leroy Greene Academy rank in California?
Is Leroy Greene Academy getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Leroy Greene Academy?
How does Leroy Greene Academy compare to other schools in Sacramento?
How does Leroy Greene Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 133 | 15% | 25% | 28% | 32% | 40% | −7 |
| Grade 7 | 117 | 15% | 32% | 31% | 23% | 46% | −2 |
| Grade 8 | 137 | 8% | 34% | 26% | 32% | 42% | −4 |
| Grade 11 | 76 | 29% | 36% | 18% | 17% | 64% | +17 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 131 | 12% | 18% | 29% | 40% | 31% | −4 |
| Grade 7 | 117 | 12% | 14% | 27% | 47% | 26% | −8 |
| Grade 8 | 137 | 7% | 15% | 34% | 45% | 22% | −10 |
| Grade 11 | 75 | 3% | 12% | 33% | 52% | 15% | −9 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 215 | 6% | 22% | 61% | 10% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 288 | 40.3% | +9 | +2 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 198 | 41.4% | +5 | +3 |
| White | 76 | 64.5% | +6 | +3 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leroy Greene Academy ← | — | 37 | 11.4% | 34.4% | −3.1 | 8.8% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 39 | 52 | #968 | 11.3% | 35.5% | 5.4% | 13.6% | +10.3pp |
| 2022 | 26 | 21 | #1718 | 9.5% | 30.9% | 18.3% | 15.4% | -12.9pp |
| 2023 | 37 | 40 | #1311 | 10.7% | 33.5% | 21.6% | 15.9% | +4.4pp |
| 2024 | 40 | 56 | #969 | 11.8% | 34.0% | 13.6% | 7.3% | +15.7pp |
| 2025 | 37 | 40 | #1354 | 11.4% | 34.4% | 11.1% | 8.8% | -3.1pp |
- — Scored here as a middle school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5.3% | 12.0% | +6.7pp |
| Male | 5.4% | 9.8% | +4.4pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | 5.9% | +5.9pp |
| Black/African American | 6.5% | 18.3% | +11.8pp |
| White | 3.3% | 13.0% | +9.7pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 6.1% | 9.8% | +3.7pp |
| Two or More Races | 8.3% | 12.2% | +3.9pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 13.5% | 14.5% | +1.0pp |
| English Learners | 4.3% | 10.2% | +5.9pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 5.6% | 12.9% | +7.3pp |
| All Students | 5.3% | 10.8% | +5.5pp |
| Homeless | — | 23.5% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction