English
−11
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Public school · Natomas Unified
3200 North Park Drive, Sacramento · 672 students · Grades 7–8
Choose up to four middle schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Natomas Middle’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Shared campus · © OpenStreetMap
Natomas Middle and H. Allen Hight Elementary share this address in the state’s school directory. OpenStreetMap maps the grounds as one campus. Which buildings each school uses here isn’t mapped.
Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
Scope Score 68
75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built
Well below California in English and math: 24% and 12% scored Proficient or Advanced in grades 7 and 8, spring 2026, against 50% and 37%.
Overview
Needs Support. Natomas Middle is lower than most California middle schools on test results, progress in both subjects and attendance.
Test results, spring 2026
Progress in a year, 2025
Showing up, 2025–26
32 in 100 students (152 of 481) missed 10% or more of school days in 2025–26. That is about one and a third times the rate at the average Natomas Unified middle school.
Each bar is Natomas Middle’s place among 2,529 California public middle schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.
A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 6–8. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.
In its own words
We haven’t read Natomas Middle’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.
Progress
Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 7 and 8 scored 11 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 13 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.
English
−11
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Math
−13
points lower than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Moderate, the second of its five growth levels.
By student group · students counted
Grades 7 and 8, 2025, 519 students in English, 517 in math with scores in both years. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.
The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.
California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 11 points below that expected score, and in math 13 points below it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.
The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.
Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.
Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.
SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 43rd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across English and math, not matched students in California's separate growth model.
Nearby
5 of the 6 middle schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Natomas Middle. Each school is compared with every California middle school.
Scope Score
7 middle schools within 4.9 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.
A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer. A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats.
Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map
Scores and family income
Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.
6 of 7 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.
English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.
Schools like it
Natomas Middle’s Scope Score is 68. 513 California middle schools, counting Natomas Middle, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 72. Natomas Middle’s result is higher than 78 of them.
The five schools with the highest results of the 513
Students from low-income families: 76%
San Lorenzo
Scope Score 96Strong · 99th percentile
Students from low-income families: 75%
Oakland
Scope Score 91Strong · 96th percentile
Students from low-income families: 85%
Garden Grove
Scope Score 86Strong · 90th percentile
Students from low-income families: 86%
Riverside
Scope Score 86Strong · 90th percentile
Students from low-income families: 77%
Rosemead
Scope Score 85Strong · 88th percentile
513 California public middle schools where 75% to 87% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.
The group is every California public middle school we score where 75% to 87% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Natomas Middle’s share. The count includes Natomas Middle. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.
Over time
Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English went from 25% to 24% and math stayed at 12%.
Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026
Grades 7 and 8. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.
English
Math
The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Natomas Unified’s line combines its 11 middle schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Natomas Unified’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.
| Spring | Natomas Middle | Natomas Unified | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 25% | 52% | 49% | 482 |
| 2018 | 28% | 54% | 50% | 472 |
| 2019 | 29% | 54% | 50% | 532 |
| 2022 | 31% | 49% | 48% | 408 |
| 2023 | 31% | 47% | 47% | 424 |
| 2024 | 22% | 45% | 47% | 416 |
| 2025 | 25% | 45% | 49% | 419 |
| 2026 | 24% | 50% | 50% | 415 |
| Spring | Natomas Middle | Natomas Unified | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 17% | 38% | 37% | 492 |
| 2018 | 19% | 40% | 37% | 474 |
| 2019 | 19% | 38% | 37% | 535 |
| 2022 | 13% | 28% | 31% | 415 |
| 2023 | 14% | 29% | 32% | 433 |
| 2024 | 9% | 28% | 33% | 411 |
| 2025 | 12% | 29% | 35% | 417 |
| 2026 | 12% | 33% | 37% | 414 |
Tests
Well below California in both subjects.
English
24%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
502619Math
12%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
68207In grades 7 and 8, spring 2026, 24% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 12% in math, against 50% and 37% across California.
The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 7 and 8 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
In grades 7 and 8, spring 2026, math trails English by 12 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 13 points across California. The grades 7 and 8 cards above give each subject’s share.
What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 23% | 25% |
| Advanced | 4% | 7% |
| Proficient | 19% | 18% |
| Developing level | 30% | 23% |
| Minimal | 47% | 52% |
| Tested | 203 | 212 |
| California | 51% | 49% |
| Difference | −28 | −24 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 11% | 14% |
| Advanced | 3% | 7% |
| Proficient | 8% | 7% |
| Developing level | 22% | 17% |
| Minimal | 67% | 69% |
| Tested | 203 | 211 |
| California | 38% | 36% |
| Difference | −27 | −22 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 7 and 8 · This school | 5% | 19% | 26% | 50% | 415 |
| English, grades 7 and 8 · California | 19% | 31% | 23% | 27% | 838,600 |
| English, grades 7 and 8 · Natomas Unified | 19% | 31% | 22% | 28% | 2,498 |
| Math, grades 7 and 8 · This school | 5% | 7% | 20% | 68% | 414 |
| Math, grades 7 and 8 · California | 21% | 16% | 23% | 40% | 838,896 |
| Math, grades 7 and 8 · Natomas Unified | 17% | 16% | 24% | 43% | 2,496 |
Spring 2026, grades 7 and 8 combined: 415 tested in English, 414 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Who goes here
Black or African American students are the largest group here, at 28% of students. 152 of 481 students missed 10% or more of school days.
Missing school, 2025–26
32in 100
students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (152 of 481 students).
At the average Natomas Unified middle school: 23 in 100. At the average California middle school: 18 in 100.
Suspensions: 23.7% of students were suspended at least once (123 of 519). Average California middle school 3.7%.
Students, 2024–25
672
students in grades 7–8.
Family income
81%
of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 546 of 672. California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
35
teachers, with 10 years of experience on average.
0% were in their first year.
76% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.
English learners
54%
of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (41 of 76 students).
Natomas Unified: 46%. California: 47%.
It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.
| Students | Here |
|---|---|
| Black or African American | 28% |
| Asian | 25% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 24% |
| White | 10% |
| Two or more races | 9% |
| Filipino | 3% |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
| Not reported | — |
Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.
Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 29 of 38.2 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.
Student groups
Seven student groups scored below the same groups across California in English.
28% of Asian students scored Proficient or Advanced in English (grades 7 and 8, spring 2026), against 76% for the same group across California. Low-income, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino and White students, students of two or more races and English learners also scored below the same groups across California; the chart gives their figures. Every group’s math results are in the table below.
Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 7 and 8 English, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.
| Group and subject | Here | vs Natomas Unified | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 346 tested in English, 345 in math | |||
| English | 23% | −1336% | −1639% |
| Math | 12% | −1022% | −1426% |
| Black or African American · 113 tested in English, 112 in math | |||
| English | 14% | −1226% | −2034% |
| Math | 5% | −1116% | −1520% |
| Asian · 102 tested | |||
| English | 28% | −3058% | −4876% |
| Math | 21% | −2445% | −5071% |
| Hispanic or Latino · 100 tested | |||
| English | 20% | −1939% | −2040% |
| Math | 9% | −1625% | −1625% |
| White · 41 tested | |||
| English | 37% | −2360% | −2562% |
| Math | 17% | −2744% | −3350% |
| Two or more races · 35 tested | |||
| English | 29% | −2251% | −3463% |
| Math | 17% | −1835% | −3350% |
| English learners · 81 tested | |||
| English | 1% | −67% | −67% |
| Math | 2% | −46% | −57% |
| Students with disabilities · 62 tested in English, 61 in math | |||
| English | 8% | −917% | −614% |
| Math | 7% | −310% | −29% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Natomas Unified, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.
Homeless students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Family and staff answers
Families can answer a short set of questions about Natomas Middle. These are not star ratings or reviews.
Families
0 of 20 needed before answers show
Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work
Staff
We don’t check staff emails for Natomas Unified yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.
Money
$19,240 for each student in 2024–25. California’s middle schools spent $19,269 for each student. Natomas Unified’s plan for 2026–27 covers $54 million.
$19,240
for each student at this school, 2024–25The district and California figures combine their middle schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,241 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓
$54million
in the district’s plan for 2026–27$30million
planned for services for English learners, low-income students and foster youthThis is the district’s plan. It is not this school’s own budget. The plan has 7 goals. The district’s page lists each one. The plan covers $54 million of $229 million in total budgeted spending. Source: Natomas Unified Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), 2026–27. Read the district’s plan →
The neighborhood
These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 95835. They are not figures for the families at Natomas Middle.
Typical household income in a year
$114,468
Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 95835.
What you can do
The state has Natomas Middle in targeted support; Natomas Unified’s board decides its plan.
When the plan is set
Natomas Unified’s board must adopt its yearly plan (LCAP) by July 1, after at least one public hearing at an earlier meeting.
How to take part
What has the state flagged?
The state named it because results were low for homeless students. This support comes with a school improvement plan, which must use approaches with evidence behind them. Ask the principal to see the school improvement plan.
Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source
Extra state help for the district
The state is giving Natomas Unified extra help in 2026. It qualified on the 2025 California School Dashboard. The county office must help the district for at least three years, including a review of its yearly plan.
Extra help for Natomas Unified: CDE’s assistance status file for the 2025 California School Dashboard. Source
Questions to ask
Bring these 7 questions to Natomas Middle. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.
Getting in
Ask Natomas Unified which school serves your address.
These links come from past records and from distance. Confirm your child’s school with the district. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level. Explore schools on the map
Not a next step: the school sharing this address. H. Allen Hight Elementary (7th percentile, Needs Support, among elementary schools, 2026) has the same street address in the state’s school directory.
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
Scope Score 67 · Needs Support · 7th percentile · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
Scope Score 72 · Developing · 34th percentile · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
Scope Score 69 · Needs Support · 14th percentile · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
Scope Score 67 · Needs Support · 7th percentile · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
Scope Score 75 · Solid · 52nd percentile · high · 2025
81% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Its zone partly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
Scope Score 67 · Needs Support · 12th percentile · high · 2025
19% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking. Older zone links come from the federal School Attendance Boundary Survey (NCES SABS).
The road from this school ends at Inderkum High. UC records 54 enrollees from Inderkum High for fall 2025. The AP Course Audit lists 16 AP courses its teachers are authorized to teach in 2025–26. Those figures come from dated records. A child starting here today would reach Inderkum High around 2028, and a school can change a lot in 2 years. By the state’s 2023 count, 79% of the students who finished high school at Inderkum High enrolled in college within 12 months, UC or not.
Where it is
A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map
Ask Natomas Unified which school serves your address. See the details ↓
Natomas Middle has a Scope Score of 68. It scored higher than 8 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools (Needs Support, 8th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓
In 2025–26, 32 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 23 in 100 at the average Natomas Unified middle school. 23.7% of students (123 of 519) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. See the details ↓
Lower, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 7 and 8 scored 11 points lower in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Moderate. In math, they scored 13 points lower, which the state calls Moderate.
In spring 2026, 23% of low-income students in grades 7 and 8 at Natomas Middle in Sacramento scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. See the details ↓
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Natomas Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Inderkum High. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary doesn’t guarantee placement; confirm your address with the district.
The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓
The full record
This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.
Data updated
October 15, 2026
Results
Students
Money and staff
Place, downloads and method
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancedaverage of English and math | 5% | 36 | 42% |
| Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math | 18% | 32 | 23% |
| 8th graders in 2026 against 6th graders in 2024 (partly different children) | +42 scale-score pts | 43 | 20% |
| Chronically absent | 32 in 100 | 32 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 23.7% (123 of 519) | 0 | 5% |
| English learners: top level | 24% | 52 | 5% |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 68 | 8 | #2323 | California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension | Grade gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | 12 in 100 | 9.4% (84 of 893) | 0 |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file | −6 |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file | +9 |
| 2023–24 | 30 in 100 | 17.9% (133 of 745) | +3 |
| 2024–25 | 30 in 100 | 17.4% (139 of 797) | +3 |
| 2025–26 | 32 in 100 | 23.7% (123 of 519) | — |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 415 | 5% | 24% |
| 2026 · Math | 414 | 5% | 12% |
| 2025 · English | 630 | 6% | 23% |
| 2025 · Math | 627 | 4% | 12% |
| 2024 · English | 597 | 5% | 21% |
| 2024 · Math | 598 | 3% | 10% |
| 2023 · English | 599 | 8% | 26% |
| 2023 · Math | 609 | 3% | 11% |
| 2022 · English | 587 | 8% | 33% |
| 2022 · Math | 597 | 4% | 14% |
| 2019 · English | 719 | 7% | 29% |
| 2019 · Math | 724 | 6% | 17% |
| 2018 · English | 745 | 3% | 29% |
| 2018 · Math | 750 | 5% | 18% |
| 2017 · English | 705 | 3% | 23% |
| 2017 · Math | 717 | 5% | 16% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 6 · English | 211 | 21% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · English | 197 | 23% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · English | 222 | 27% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · Math | 210 | 12% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · Math | 197 | 12% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · Math | 220 | 11% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · English | 181 | 19% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · English | 199 | 20% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · English | 217 | 24% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 187 | 10% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 195 | 8% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 216 | 11% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · English | 175 | 15% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · English | 195 | 34% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · English | 229 | 28% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 176 | 5% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 202 | 19% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 231 | 10% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · English | 179 | 36% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · English | 216 | 31% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · English | 192 | 30% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 182 | 16% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 218 | 16% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · Math | 197 | 11% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · English | 187 | 28% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · English | 283 | 31% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · English | 249 | 27% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · Math | 189 | 14% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · Math | 284 | 20% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · Math | 251 | 16% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · English | 273 | 30% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · English | 235 | 23% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · English | 237 | 32% |
| 2018 · Grade 6 · Math | 276 | 17% |
| 2018 · Grade 7 · Math | 239 | 18% |
| 2018 · Grade 8 · Math | 235 | 20% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · English | 223 | 18% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · English | 223 | 26% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · English | 259 | 24% |
| 2017 · Grade 6 · Math | 225 | 15% |
| 2017 · Grade 7 · Math | 227 | 16% |
| 2017 · Grade 8 · Math | 265 | 17% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 209 | 4% | 12% | 52% | 32% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 346 | 23% | −13 | −16 |
| Black or African American | 113 | 14% | −12 | −20 |
| Asian | 102 | 28% | −30 | −48 |
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | −11 | 519 | Moderate | −13 | 517 | Moderate |
| Low-income | −13 | 436 | Moderate | −13 | 434 | Moderate |
| English-only students | −14 | 354 | not categorized | −16 | 352 | not categorized |
| Black or African American | −19 | 155 | Moderate | −15 | 155 | Moderate |
| Hispanic or Latino | −4 | 140 | Average | −16 | 139 | Moderate |
| English learners | −9 | 130 | Moderate | −6 | 130 | Moderate |
| Asian | −3 | 100 | Average | −7 | 100 | Moderate |
| Students with disabilities | −28 | 78 | Minimal | −23 | 77 | Minimal |
| Recently reclassified as fluent in English | +3 | 66 | not categorized | −9 | 66 | not categorized |
| English learners only | −18 | 64 | not categorized | −5 | 64 | not categorized |
| Two or more races | −22 | 51 | Minimal | −19 | 51 | Moderate |
| White | −3 | 47 | Average | +6 | 46 | Accelerated |
| Long-term English learners (grades 6–8 only) | −21 | 39 | Minimal | −20 | 39 | Moderate |
| Homeless | −26 | 26 | Minimal | −18 | 26 | Moderate |
| Filipino | +10 | 14 | Accelerated | −7 | 14 | Moderate |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-term English learner counts cover grades 6–8 only (CDE’s rule), so that row is not comparable to the All students row. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 7 and 8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 184 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
State model · English−11 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 7 and 8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 7 and 8
519 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
State model · math−13 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 7 and 8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 7 and 8
517 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 7 and 8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.
CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 30 in 100 → 2025–26 · 32 in 100 · +2 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 17.4% (139 of 797) → 2025–26 · 23.7% (123 of 519) · +6.3 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 11 in 100 | 27 in 100 | +16 in 100 |
| Male | 13 in 100 | 36 in 100 | +23 in 100 |
| Asian | 4 in 100 | 26 in 100 | +22 in 100 |
| Black or African American | 14 in 100 | 35 in 100 | +21 in 100 |
| Filipino | 3 of 47 | 2 of 14 | — |
| Hispanic or Latino | 10 in 100 | 39 in 100 | +29 in 100 |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 of 10 | — | — |
| Pacific Islander | 3 of 18 | — | — |
| Two or more races | 23 of 98 | 17 of 41 | — |
| White | 13 of 90 | 8 of 46 | — |
| Students with disabilities | 16 in 100 | 35 of 86 | — |
| English learners | 12 in 100 | 25 of 91 | — |
| Foster youth | 1 of 14 | — | — |
| Homeless | 1 of 13 | 19 of 38 | — |
| Low-income | 15 in 100 | 33 in 100 | +18 in 100 |
| All students | 12 in 100 | 32 in 100 | +20 in 100 |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 13,748 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 672
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 672
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $119,702,386 | 61.64% | 62% |
| Instruction support | $23,799,453 | 12.26% | 12% |
| Student services | $14,842,503 | 7.64% | 8% |
| Administration | $15,189,899 | 7.82% | 8% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $18,495,701 | 9.52% | 9% |
| Other | $2,167,439 | 1.12% | 1% |
| Total | $194,197,381 | 100.00% | 100% |
These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $194,197,381 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $114,468 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 50% |
| ZIP-area population | 42,004 |
| Median age | 38.2 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95835 →
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.