Math
43%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Charter high school
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep
A foundation in the reported results. Look across subjects and student groups.
78% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 43% in math. 98.6% graduate in four years. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
English
78%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
—Total enrollment
Graduation
98.6%Four-year graduation rate
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grade 11 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 52% | 82% |
| 2022 | 48% | 86% |
| 2023 | 46% | 77% |
| 2024 | 39% | 82% |
| 2025 | 43% | 78% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
20%ProficientStandard Met
23%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
27%MinimalStandard Not Met
30%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
45%ProficientStandard Met
33%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
19%MinimalStandard Not Met
3%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Has held the 82nd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Most rating sites would stop at “60% proficient” and call it done. Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep deserves a closer read. It sits at the 82nd percentile of 1,647 California high schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep's low-income kids hit 71.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
As a charter, Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
159 tested · 1 of 1 grade published
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep scores 66 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 1,647 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 60% meet the standard today, versus 67% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
Percentile among 1,647 high schools statewide
ELAGreen(Declined)MathYellow(Declined)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 82% | 86% | 77% | 82% | 78% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 52% | 48% | 46% | 39% | 43% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Three in five of students here meet the standard. One in four clear it by a lot.
ELA78% met or exceeded
Exceeded 45%Met 33%Nearly Met 19%Not Met 3%
Math43% met or exceeded
Exceeded 20%Met 23%Nearly Met 27%Not Met 30%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California high schools · average20% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 66 | 32% | 60% | 98.6% | 35.5% | 6.0% | 0.5% |
| CA average · High School | 54 | 20% | 43% | 92.5% | 43.0% | 23.1% | 3.3% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope6654
% Exceeded32%20%
% Met+60%43%
Grad rate98.6%92.5%
College readiness35.5%43.0%
Absence6.0%23.1%
Suspension0.5%3.3%
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard ahead of the same group statewide.
71.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. This comparison does not tell us what caused the difference.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 60% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 60%, district —, state 43%60%
FemaleFemale: this school 59%, district 37%, state 44%59% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 53%, district 26%, state 32%53% · −8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 62%, district 34%, state 42%62% · +2 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 59%, district 48%, state 72%59% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 53%, district 29%, state 32%53% · −7 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 51%, state 56%63% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 8%, district 12%, state 11%8% · −53 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 77%, district 56%, state 65%77% · +17 vs school
5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
No student-group growth record is available for this school in this data release.
Where graduates go
What happens after high school?
87%
Enrolled in college within a year
Class of 2023 · 130 of 149 completers · includes community colleges
149Completers
32%
Other colleges48 completers · Outside the California community college system
55%
California community colleges82 completers · Enrolled within a year
13%
Not recorded enrolled19 completers · No college enrollment in this reporting window
Destination data describes this earlier graduating class, separately from current-year test results and graduation. Percentages are rounded.
College destinations and the full graduate record
Where graduates go · 2024–25
Where graduates go
Context — never part of the Scope Score
87%
College-going rate, class of 2023
Where they went after graduation
Of Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep's class of 2023, 87% enrolled in college somewhere within a year — a CSU, a community college, a UC, or out of state.
College destination mix, class of 2023
Class of 2023: 149 completers, 87% enrolled somewhere within a year
11%
20%
55%
13%
University of California 16 (11%)California State University 30 (20%)California community college 82 (55%)In-state private 1 (1%)Out-of-state, 4-year 1 (1%)Out-of-state, 2-year 0 (0%)Not enrolled 19 (13%)
Percentages are computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers) from CDE-reported counts, not a CDE-native rate. Data source: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort — the newest published; National Student Clearinghouse match.
UC application funnel — one destination of six, tracked in detail because UC is the only source with 30 years of history
In fall 2025, 23 of Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep's 141 graduates enrolled in the University of California system — Davis the most common landing, with 13 enrollees.
Applied58fall 2025, universitywide
Admitted42
Enrolled23
ShowHide the UC campus list and the 2014–2025 trend
Where they landed (fall 2025)
6 of 9 campuses are masked below UC's privacy floor — a protection, not a verdict.
Campuses never sum to the universitywide figure — students apply to several.
UC enrollees, universitywide, 2014–2025
Peak: 32 enrolled, 2024
UC publishes this trend back to 1994 — no other destination has a comparable multi-year record.
UC is one road of many — the full destination mix for the class of 2023 is below. And who applied isn't who the school taught: the ratio between the two reflects the self-selected pool of students who chose to apply, not what happened in the classroom. By the state's 2023 count, 87% of this class's predecessors enrolled in college somewhere within a year. More of the class of 2023 enrolled at community colleges (82) than at UC (16).
Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle · college-going rate: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
AP subjects authorized
Authorization does not mean every course runs every year. Ask about current offerings, prerequisites, scheduling and support.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
The people teaching here
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep's teachers are authorized to teach 14 of the 40 AP subjects the College Board offers — including Calculus AB, Computer Science A, and Computer Science Principles.
Teaching staff38 teachers
Avg. experience12.9 years
Fully credentialed90%
First-year teachers3%
Intern / emergency permit1.9%
PrincipalMelissa Mori
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$56,265 – $121,338
Principal salary$145,257 – $159,905
Superintendent salary$318,270
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Course breadth
AP exam qualifiers44 studentsCCI, participation not authorization
Advanced coursework
AP subjects taught14
ShowHide the 14 AP courses by discipline
Math & Computer Science (3)Calculus AB · Computer Science A · Computer Science Principles
Sciences (1)Chemistry
English (2)English Language and Composition · English Literature and Composition
History & Social Science (3)Comparative Government and Politics · U.S. Government and Politics · United States History
World Languages & Cultures (1)Spanish Language and Culture
Arts (2)2-D Art and Design · Drawing
AP Capstone (2)Research · Seminar
Data source: College Board AP Course Audit, 2025 - 2026 audit year (authorization, not enrollment) · IB World Schools directory, name-matched
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Showing up, and staying in class
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 6.0%, district 17.8%, state 23.1%6.0% · −17.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.5%, district —, state 3.3%0.5% · −2.8pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 9–123.6%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $15,637 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1,385 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $15,637, CA average $14,491$15,637 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,385 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,021 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 62%Instruction support 12%Student services 8%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 1%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,925 per pupil
2019$12,015 per pupil
2018$12,033 per pupil
2017$9,532 per pupil
2016$10,087 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
The neighborhood it serves
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
On the state's science test (CAST), 55% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino25.2% · district 32.7% · CA 56.1%
White14.3% · district 12.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian43.2% · district 19.0% · CA 10.2%
Black3.7% · district 18.4% · CA 4.8%
Other13.6% · district 17.0% · CA 9.0%
Median income$101K · CA $85K
Median home value$558K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population36,245
Median age35 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · high schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep | Charter | Strong | 32% | 60% | School being viewed | |
| Inderkum High | Public | Solid | 19% | 41% | 1.6 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
3 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check enrollment with this charter school
Ask the school about applications, priorities and deadlines for your child’s grade.
School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Charter enrollment details
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep a good high school?
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep has a Scope Score of 66 out of 100, placing it in the 82nd percentile of California high schools and ranked #294 statewide. 32.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.6 percentage points above the California average of 19.8%. The Scope Score weights 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate (25%), exceeded standard (22%), college/career readiness (20%), met or exceeded (proficient) (18%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 60.4% of students at Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 32.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 28.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 32.4% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 318 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep rank in California?
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep ranks #294 among California high schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep?
6.0% of students at Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 23.1%. The suspension rate is 0.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep compare to other schools in Sacramento?
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep scores 66/100 (82nd percentile) among California high schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Sacramento page or the map view to compare all high schools nearby.
How does Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep in Sacramento, 71.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep outperforms its district average for low-income students by 40.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (33.8% Math proficient); Asian students (76.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 6.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 71 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What AP courses are offered at Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep?
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep's teachers are authorized to teach 14 of the 40 AP subjects the College Board offers, per the 2025 - 2026 AP Course Audit: 2-D Art and Design, Calculus AB, Chemistry, Comparative Government and Politics, Computer Science A, Computer Science Principles, Drawing, English Language and Composition, English Literature and Composition, Research, Seminar, Spanish Language and Culture, U.S. Government and Politics, United States History. Authorization means the school may teach a course, not that a section is running this year, and it's separate from AP exam pass rates. Data source: College Board AP Course Audit, analyzed by SchoolScope.
How many students from Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep go to UC?
In fall 2025, 23 Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep graduates enrolled at University of California campuses, universitywide. That figure can't be split into a per-campus sum — students apply to several UC campuses at once, so campus-level counts don't add up to the universitywide total. UC is one destination among many: this says nothing about graduates who chose a CSU, a private college, a community college, or work, and it is a count, not a rate or a ranking. Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 6 things our score weighs
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 98.6% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 32.4% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 35.5% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 60.4% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 6.0% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.5% | 3.3% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures graduation, test performance, college readiness, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep: reading the evidence
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep has an average Met + Exceeded rate of 60% and an Exceeded rate of 32.4% across the reported grades and subjects. Ask how students are supported and challenged at different starting points.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep is ranked #294 statewide · #1 of 6 in Natomas Unified.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 98.6% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 32.4% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 35.5% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 60.4% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 6.0% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.5% | 3.3% | 5% |
- Graduation rate
- ↑ vs CA 92.5% · index 63 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 19.8% · index 68 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- College readiness
- ↓ vs CA 43.0% · index 51 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 43.2% · index 68 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 23.1% · index 70 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 0.3pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 3.3% · index 64 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 1.6pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 159 | 45% | 33% | 19% | 3% | 78% | +29 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 159 | 20% | 23% | 27% | 30% | 43% | +19 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 159 | 17% | 38% | 43% | 1% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 71 | 71.8% | +41 | +34 |
| Asian | 65 | 76.9% | +24 | +3 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 43 | 72.1% | +36 | +33 |
03Nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep ← | — | 66 | 32.4% | 60.4% | 0.5% |
| Inderkum High | 1.6 mi | 53 | 18.6% | 40.8% | 3.7% |
| California average | — | 54 | 19.8% | 43.2% | 3.3% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
Graduation Rate
98.6%
AP Exam Prepared
35.5%
A-G Completion
100.0%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
87.2%
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 67 | 80 | #304 | 31.6% | 67.3% | 4.5% | 1.0% |
| 2022 | 69 | 86 | #226 | 33.0% | 67.1% | 6.6% | 0.7% |
| 2023 | 65 | 79 | #336 | 27.3% | 61.7% | 8.9% | 2.2% |
| 2024 | 66 | 82 | #291 | 33.1% | 60.4% | 6.3% | 2.1% |
| 2025 | 66 | 82 | #294 | 32.4% | 60.4% | 6.0% | 0.5% |
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.0% | 4.1% | +1.1pp |
| Male | 1.6% | 3.1% | +1.5pp |
| Asian | 2.6% | 5.2% | +2.6pp |
| Black/African American | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| Filipino | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 2.4% | 3.4% | +1.0pp |
| Pacific Islander | 6.7% | — | — |
| Two or More Races | 6.9% | 3.8% | -3.1pp |
| White | 1.0% | 1.9% | +0.9pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 3.8% | 3.4% | -0.4pp |
| English Learners | 2.3% | 4.3% | +2.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 3.3% | 4.5% | +1.2pp |
| All Students | 2.3% | 3.6% | +1.3pp |
06UC admissions, universitywide2014–2025 · summed across CEEB codes at query time
ShowHide table 06 — UC admissions, universitywide
| Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled | GPA (applied) | GPA (admitted) | GPA (enrolled) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 58 | 42 | 23 | 3.80 | 3.90 | 4.10 |
| 2024 | 76 | 51 | 32 | 3.87 | 4.00 | 4.10 |
| 2023 | 49 | 28 | 17 | 3.73 | 3.82 | 3.83 |
| 2022 | 61 | 42 | 29 | 3.88 | 3.99 | 4.10 |
| 2021 | 57 | 40 | 24 | 3.66 | 3.82 | 3.92 |
| 2020 | 39 | 23 | 16 | 3.72 | 3.96 | 4.01 |
| 2019 | 53 | 25 | 22 | 3.74 | 3.95 | 4.00 |
| 2018 | 56 | 29 | 15 | 3.53 | 3.82 | 3.94 |
| 2017 | 35 | 22 | 9 | 3.60 | 3.87 | 3.98 |
| 2016 | 40 | 27 | 16 | 3.71 | 3.85 | 3.90 |
| 2015 | 27 | 20 | 10 | 3.61 | 3.81 | 3.78 |
| 2014 | 34 | 25 | 16 | 3.59 | 3.78 | 3.89 |
‹n = UC masks counts below n · a missing year means zero or masked — never assume zero · GPA cells blank for years with more than one contributing CEEB code (a summed GPA would be fabricated math) · GPAs live here and nowhere else on this page · Applied/Admitted/Enrolled reflect who applied, not what the school taught — no admit rate is computed or implied by this table. Series shown from 2014; full record to 1994 at the UC Infocenter.
07UC admissions by campuslatest falls on file
ShowHide table 07 — UC admissions by campus
| Campus | Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2025 | 34 | 6 | 3 |
| Berkeley | 2024 | 49 | 7 | 4 |
| Berkeley | 2023 | 23 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2022 | 43 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2021 | 42 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2025 | 54 | 21 | 13 |
| Davis | 2024 | 65 | 31 | 20 |
| Davis | 2023 | 44 | 11 | 5 |
| Davis | 2022 | 58 | 18 | 12 |
| Davis | 2021 | 53 | 19 | 9 |
| Irvine | 2025 | 22 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2024 | 42 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Irvine | 2023 | 21 | 8 | 5 |
| Irvine | 2022 | 35 | 16 | 7 |
| Irvine | 2021 | 26 | 14 | 6 |
| Los Angeles | 2025 | 27 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2024 | 39 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2023 | 18 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2022 | 31 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2021 | 32 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2025 | 24 | 24 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2024 | 12 | 12 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2023 | 11 | 10 | 4 |
| Merced | 2022 | 25 | 22 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2021 | 17 | 14 | 3 |
| Riverside | 2025 | 21 | 15 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2024 | 16 | 11 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2023 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2022 | 9 | 8 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2021 | 8 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2025 | 25 | 5 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2024 | 34 | 10 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2023 | 21 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2022 | 28 | 5 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2021 | 27 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2025 | 18 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2024 | 37 | 11 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2023 | 13 | 4 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2022 | 20 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2021 | 15 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2025 | 26 | 15 | 4 |
| Santa Cruz | 2024 | 23 | 18 | 3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2023 | 13 | 7 | ‹3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2022 | 26 | 12 | 3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2021 | 13 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2025 | 58 | 42 | 23 |
| Universitywide | 2024 | 76 | 51 | 32 |
| Universitywide | 2023 | 49 | 28 | 17 |
| Universitywide | 2022 | 61 | 42 | 29 |
| Universitywide | 2021 | 57 | 40 | 24 |
Σ campuses ≠ universitywide — students apply to several campuses; the Universitywide row (muted) is its own independent count, never a sum of the rows above it.
08AP course catalog2025 - 2026
ShowHide table 08 — AP course catalog
| Subject | Taught by |
|---|---|
| 2-D Art and Design | this school |
| Calculus AB | this school |
| Chemistry | this school |
| Comparative Government and Politics | this school |
| Computer Science A | this school |
| Computer Science Principles | this school |
| Drawing | this school |
| English Language and Composition | this school |
| English Literature and Composition | this school |
| Research | this school |
| Seminar | this school |
| Spanish Language and Culture | this school |
| U.S. Government and Politics | this school |
| United States History | this school |
Authorization ≠ a section running this year — the Ledger records what the school may teach, not seat counts.
09College destinationsclass of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate
ShowHide table 09 — College destinations
| Destination | Completers | % (derived) |
|---|---|---|
| University of California | 16 | 10.7% |
| California State University | 30 | 20.1% |
| California community college | 82 | 55.0% |
| In-state private | 1 | 0.7% |
| Out-of-state, 4-year | 1 | 0.7% |
| Out-of-state, 2-year | 0 | 0.0% |
| Not enrolled | 19 | 12.8% |
149 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 87% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · a missing cell is CDE suppression, never a fabricated zero · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/natomas-pacific-pathways-prep-2425"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=1,647 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · UC Infocenter (annual refresh, summer) — ‹5/‹3 = masked, never summed across campuses · AP Course Ledger 2025 - 2026 (November refresh; authorization not enrollment) · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction