Math
19%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Public elementary school
Larry G. Meeks Academy
The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
19% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 19% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Building Momentum
What this means for your family
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
English
19%Grades 3 & 5 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
169Total enrollment
Chronic absence
15%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 3 & 5 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 33% | 40% |
| 2023 | 31% | 33% |
| 2024 | 38% | 47% |
| 2025 | 19% | 19% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
4%ProficientStandard Met
15%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
21%MinimalStandard Not Met
60%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
10%ProficientStandard Met
8%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
25%MinimalStandard Not Met
56%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2022 to 2025
Slipped from the 53rd to the 17th percentile since 2022.
Most rating sites would stop at “28% proficient” and call it done. Larry G. Meeks Academy deserves a closer read. Three in four of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
159 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · no cohort tracked
Larry G. Meeks Academy scores 23 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 17th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide
ELAOrange(Declined)MathYellow(Increased)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 42% | 33% | 53% | 22% |
| Grade 4 | 45% | 41% | 24% | 42% |
| Grade 5 | 39% | 33% | 43% | 16% |
| Grade 6 | 19% | 18% | 16% | 9% |
| Grade 7 | 51% | 29% | 27% | 38% |
| Grade 8 | 37% | 33% | 23% | 61% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 43% | 45% | 68% | 26% |
| Grade 4 | 31% | 29% | 40% | 47% |
| Grade 5 | 23% | 17% | 19% | 12% |
| Grade 6 | 8% | 24% | 11% | 28% |
| Grade 7 | 29% | 17% | 34% | 31% |
| Grade 8 | 7% | 3% | 20% | 43% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
One in four of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.
ELA31% met or exceeded
Exceeded 12%Met 19%Nearly Met 26%Not Met 43%
Math31% met or exceeded
Exceeded 8%Met 23%Nearly Met 25%Not Met 44%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 23 | 11% | 28% | — | 15.1% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | — | 17.9% | 1.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope2339
% Exceeded11%21%
% Met+28%43%
Growth——
Absence15.1%17.9%
Suspension0.3%1.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model splits here — the 15th percentile in reading against the 71st in math, among elementary schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits a little below the middle of California elementary schools in reading, and the 71st in math. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −11 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 15th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.15th pctile · −11 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 71st percentile of 7,518 reported schools.71st pctile · +8 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Larry G. Meeks Academy in Sacramento, 27.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Larry G. Meeks Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.4% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 109 students tested.
Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 11 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 31% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 31%, district —, state 43%31%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 28%, district 26%, state 32%28% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 22%, district 34%, state 42%22% · −9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 37%, state 44%36% · +5 vs school
12 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.4pp.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
Low-income students65 studentsLow-income students, reading: −12 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 65 students.−12 pts · −12 vs typical
English Only62 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −9 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 62 students.−9 pts · −12 vs typical
Math
Low-income students65 studentsLow-income students, math: +11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 65 students.+11 pts · +12 vs typical
English Only62 studentsEnglish Only, math: +5 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 62 students.+5 pts · +4 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 5 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 15 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher15 · district 23
Teaching staff11 teachers
Avg. experience13.0 years
Fully credentialed51%
Intern / emergency permit16.7%
PrincipalColleen Perry
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$56,265 – $121,338
Principal salary$145,257 – $159,905
Superintendent salary$318,270
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here show up more, and get suspended less, than the state average.
Grades 4–6 students miss school at roughly twice the rate of TK/K students (16.3% vs 8.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.1%, district 17.8%, state 17.9%15.1% · −2.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.3%, district —, state 1.6%0.3% · −1.3pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.3%
Grades 7–812.2%
TK/K8.3%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $21,378 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$54 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $21,378, CA average $14,491$21,378 · spent at this school
Federal share$54 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,021 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 62%Instruction support 12%Student services 8%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 1%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,925 per pupil
2019$12,015 per pupil
2018$12,033 per pupil
2017$9,532 per pupil
2016$10,087 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Three in four of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
At 169 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).
On the state's science test (CAST), 26% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino28.4% · district 32.7% · CA 56.1%
White12.4% · district 12.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian16.0% · district 19.0% · CA 10.2%
Black15.4% · district 18.4% · CA 4.8%
Other27.8% · district 17.0% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch75.7% · CA 64%
Median income$98K · CA $85K
Median home value$464K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+32% · CA 35%
ZIP population42,265
Median age35 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · elementary schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry G. Meeks Academy | Public | Needs Support | 11% | 28% | School being viewed | |
| Natomas Charter | Charter | Strong | 37% | 63% | 2.9 mi | |
| Two Rivers Elementary | Public | Solid | 19% | 44% | 1.7 mi | |
| Elkhorn Village Elementary | Public | Developing | 11% | 31% | 1.8 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
13 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Natomas Unified.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
The road from this school ends at Natomas High, which sent 14 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 12 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Natomas High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 58% of Natomas High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
14 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 12 AP subjects taught → full record on Natomas High's page
Source: UC & College Board
Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Larry G. Meeks Academy a good elementary school?
Larry G. Meeks Academy has a Scope Score of 23 out of 100, placing it in the 17th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,722 statewide. 11.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Larry G. Meeks Academy's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 27.6% of students at Larry G. Meeks Academy met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.0% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 134 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Larry G. Meeks Academy rank in California?
Larry G. Meeks Academy ranks #4,722 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 17th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Larry G. Meeks Academy?
15.1% of students at Larry G. Meeks Academy are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Larry G. Meeks Academy compare to other schools in Sacramento?
Larry G. Meeks Academy scores 23/100 (17th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 169 students. Use the schools in Sacramento page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does Larry G. Meeks Academy serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Larry G. Meeks Academy in Sacramento, 27.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Larry G. Meeks Academy trails its district average for low-income students by 3.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.4% Math proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 109 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 6 things our score weighs
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 11.0% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 27.6% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 15.1% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.3% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 8.3% | 18.0% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | -9.9pp | -2.9pp | — |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Larry G. Meeks Academy: reading the evidence
Larry G. Meeks Academy posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (0.3% vs 1.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Larry G. Meeks Academy is ranked #4,722 statewide · #10 of 13 in Natomas Unified.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 11.0% | 21.4% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 27.6% | 42.7% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 15.1% | 17.9% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 0.3% | 1.6% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 8.3% | 18.0% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) | -9.9pp | -2.9pp | not scored |
- Exceeded standard
- ↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 40 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 39 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.9pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↓ vs CA 18.0% · index 39 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
- Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
- ↓ vs CA -2.9pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 13% | 9% | 35% | 43% | 22% | −21 |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 21% | 21% | 11% | 47% | 42% | −2 |
| Grade 5 | 25 | 8% | 8% | 16% | 68% | 16% | −32 |
| Grade 6 | 32 | 3% | 6% | 38% | 53% | 9% | −37 |
| Grade 7 | 32 | 13% | 25% | 41% | 22% | 38% | −10 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 18% | 43% | 11% | 29% | 61% | +14 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23 | 4% | 22% | 17% | 57% | 26% | −19 |
| Grade 4 | 19 | 16% | 32% | 11% | 42% | 47% | +6 |
| Grade 5 | 25 | 4% | 8% | 24% | 64% | 12% | −23 |
| Grade 6 | 32 | 3% | 25% | 28% | 44% | 28% | −6 |
| Grade 7 | 32 | 13% | 19% | 34% | 34% | 31% | −2 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 11% | 32% | 29% | 29% | 43% | +11 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 53 | 6% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 109 | 27.5% | −3 | −11 |
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry G. Meeks Academy ← | — | 23 | 11.0% | 27.6% | −9.9pp | — | 0.3% |
| Natomas Charter | 2.9 mi | 64 | 37.0% | 62.6% | +3.0pp | — | 1.0% |
| Two Rivers Elementary | 1.7 mi | 41 | 19.1% | 43.8% | +10.8pp | — | 2.9% |
| Elkhorn Village Elementary | 1.8 mi | 35 | 10.9% | 30.5% | −0.0pp | — | 2.7% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.4% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 33 | 53 | #2694 | 14.4% | 37.3% | 35.5% | 0.1% | -11.2pp |
| 2023 | 34 | 52 | #2713 | 16.0% | 33.2% | 19.6% | 0.2% | -14.4pp |
| 2024 | 35 | 46 | #3091 | 18.2% | 41.3% | 17.0% | 0.3% | -29.2pp |
| 2025 | 23 | 17 | #4722 | 11.0% | 27.6% | 15.1% | 0.3% | -9.9pp |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
What we can't show
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 11 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | — | 14.0% | — |
| Male | — | 14.7% | — |
| Asian | — | 5.6% | — |
| Black/African American | — | 26.3% | — |
| Filipino | — | 0.0% | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | — | 20.0% | — |
| Two or More Races | — | 6.5% | — |
| White | — | 11.1% | — |
| Students with Disabilities | — | 17.9% | — |
| English Learners | — | 6.1% | — |
| Homeless | — | 21.4% | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | — | 13.6% | — |
| All Students | — | 14.4% | — |
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | −11 | 87 | Moderate | +8 | 87 | Accelerated |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | −12 | 65 | Moderate | +11 | 65 | Accelerated |
| English Only | −9 | 62 | not categorised | +5 | 62 | not categorised |
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 26 | Average | +19 | 26 | Accelerated |
| English Learner | −23 | 16 | Minimal | +16 | 16 | Accelerated |
| Two or More Races | +9 | 16 | Accelerated | 0 | 16 | Average |
| Black or African American | −35 | 13 | Minimal | −12 | 13 | Moderate |
| White | −32 | 11 | Minimal | +15 | 11 | Accelerated |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/larry-g-meeks-academy-0624"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Larry G. Meeks Academy — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction