ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Pine Valley Middle · San Ramon

Pine Valley Middle: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.

Pine Valley pairs 78% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope8043
% Exceeded48%17%
% Met+78%39%
Growth+8.3+1.5
Absence5.1%18.5%
Suspension2.2%3.7%
Scope Score
80
🚀 Growth Engine · Strong
ranked #51 statewide · #3 of 8 in San Ramon Valley Unified

Pine Valley Middle scores 80 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 98th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “78% proficient” and call it done. Pine Valley deserves a closer read. It sits at the 98th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Pine Valley's low-income kids hit 69.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 98th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 78% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 678%78%74%81%79%
Grade 776%78%75%86%82%
Grade 880%80%71%81%88%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 674%64%62%66%71%
Grade 772%65%65%73%70%
Grade 879%64%71%74%79%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

45%
35%
20%
Grade 6 · 80% proficient
46%
36%
18%
Grade 7 · 82% proficient
51%
37%
12%
Grade 8 · 88% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 6.2pp across grades; the floor rises 8.4pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

69.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Pine Valley's most underrated number

69.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Pine Valley low-income: 69.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
48.4%
State 16.8%
31.6pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+8.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
78.0%
State 39.3%
38.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
5.1%
State 18.5%
13.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.2%
State 3.7%
1.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
47.1%
State 18.0%
29.1pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Pine Valley Middle in San Ramon, 69.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Pine Valley Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (45.1% Math proficient); Asian students (91.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 71 students tested.

All students at this school: 78% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 78%, district —, state 39%78%
MaleMale: this school 76%, district 76%, state 42%76% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 80%, district 78%, state 44%80% · +2 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 88%, district 86%, state 72%88% · +10 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 70%, district 71%, state 56%70% · −8 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 64%, district 57%, state 32%64% · −14 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 74%, district 77%, state 56%74% · −4 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 35%, district 36%, state 15%35% · −43 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 57%, district 55%, state 32%57% · −21 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 67%, district 73%, state 65%67% · −10 vs school

7 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +10.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 5.1%, district 9.3%, state 18.5%5.1% · −13.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.2%, district —, state 3.7%2.2% · −1.4pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–64.8%
Grades 7–84.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 23:125:1
Teaching staff40 teachers
Avg. experience15.2 years
Fully credentialed85%
First-year teachers3%
Intern / emergency permit3.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$62,631 – $126,769
Principal salary$169,899 – $193,837
Superintendent salary$395,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $13,779, CA average $14,815$13,779 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$43 per student

$43 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,036 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,168 per pupil
2019$11,540 per pupil
2018$11,378 per pupil
2017$10,908 per pupil
2016$10,566 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian45.0%
District 44.5% · CA 10.2%
White29.7%
District 31.4% · CA 19.9%
Other14.3%
District 13.3% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic9.9%
District 9.2% · CA 56.1%
Black1.1%
District 1.6% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 6.8% (57pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$185K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.38M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+65% · CA 35%
ZIP population39,583
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 69% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Pine Valley Middle a good middle school?

Pine Valley Middle has a Scope Score of 80 out of 100, placing it in the 98th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #51 statewide. 48.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 31.6 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Pine Valley Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 78.0% of students at Pine Valley Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 48.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 29.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 48.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,912 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Pine Valley Middle rank in California?

Pine Valley Middle ranks #51 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 98th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Pine Valley Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Pine Valley Middle increases by 8.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Pine Valley Middle?

5.1% of students at Pine Valley Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Pine Valley Middle compare to other schools in San Ramon?

Pine Valley Middle scores 80/100 (98th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 973 students. Use the schools in San Ramon page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Pine Valley Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Pine Valley Middle in San Ramon, 69.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Pine Valley Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 9.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (45.1% Math proficient); Asian students (91.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.8 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 71 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
48.4%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 85th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+8.3pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 69th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
78.0%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 81th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
5.1%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 69th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.2%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 56th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
47.1%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 85th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 630545%35%15%6%79%+33
Grade 734246%36%11%7%82%+34
Grade 830951%37%9%4%88%+42
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 630545%26%20%9%71%+36
Grade 734246%23%20%10%70%+36
Grade 830958%21%15%6%79%+47
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1130834%35%29%2%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7169.0%+9+31
Asian43991.1%+4+17
White27375.1%−0+13
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Pine Valley Middle ←8048.4%78.0%+8.32.2%
Windemere Ranch Middle2.3 mi8157.0%83.7%+5.23.2%
Gale Ranch Middle2.8 mi8156.1%82.2%−4.03.2%
Iron Horse Middle2.3 mi7848.4%78.6%+7.51.6%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196792#15642.3%76.5%4.5%3.5%+3.6pp
20226893#15238.2%71.4%5.7%2.6%+1.1pp
20236992#16738.2%69.7%6.6%1.5%+3.0pp
20247796#8044.3%76.9%5.0%2.3%+3.9pp
20258098#5148.4%78.0%5.1%2.2%+8.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female4.1%4.5%+0.4pp
Male5.0%5.2%+0.2pp
Asian1.8%2.0%+0.2pp
Black/African American9.5%14.3%+4.8pp
White0.0%7.1%+7.1pp
Hispanic/Latino2.9%8.1%+5.2pp
Two or More Races3.9%4.3%+0.4pp
Students with Disabilities13.5%9.8%-3.7pp
English Learners5.0%3.7%-1.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.3%13.3%+0.0pp
All Students4.5%4.9%+0.4pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction