Charlotte Wood Middle: One in three kids exceed the standard. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.
Charlotte Wood is one of the strongest middle schools in Danville by raw achievement. The catch worth understanding: the cohort doesn't gain ground year-over-year.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 63 | 38% | 74% | -8.7 | 5.7% | 1.6% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Charlotte Wood Middle scores 63 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 88th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.
Most rating sites would stop at “74% proficient” and call it done. Charlotte Wood deserves a closer read. It sits at the 88th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Charlotte Wood's low-income kids hit 63.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 77th to the 88th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 middle schools.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 74% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 78% | 71% | 79% | 79% | 84% |
| Grade 7 | 76% | 73% | 72% | 68% | 82% |
| Grade 8 | 74% | 73% | 69% | 61% | 78% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 81% | 63% | 67% | 68% | 70% |
| Grade 7 | 67% | 52% | 57% | 62% | 69% |
| Grade 8 | 57% | 48% | 50% | 56% | 58% |
The story this school is actually telling
of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 16.8%.
proficiency runs 77% in this year's grade 6 against 68% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 14.0pp across grades; the floor slips 6.4pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Charlotte Wood's most underrated number
63.8% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.
- Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Charlotte Wood Middle in Danville, 63.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Charlotte Wood Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (51.1% Math proficient); White students (80.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.1 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 47 students tested.
7 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 25.6pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +10.9pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 51% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Charlotte Wood Middle a good middle school?
What are Charlotte Wood Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Charlotte Wood Middle rank in California?
Is Charlotte Wood Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Charlotte Wood Middle?
How does Charlotte Wood Middle compare to other schools in Danville?
How does Charlotte Wood Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 75
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 81
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 265 | 43% | 42% | 13% | 3% | 84% | +38 |
| Grade 7 | 290 | 42% | 40% | 13% | 5% | 82% | +34 |
| Grade 8 | 265 | 29% | 49% | 17% | 5% | 78% | +32 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 266 | 39% | 30% | 22% | 8% | 70% | +35 |
| Grade 7 | 289 | 41% | 28% | 21% | 10% | 69% | +35 |
| Grade 8 | 265 | 34% | 24% | 23% | 18% | 58% | +26 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 264 | 21% | 30% | 47% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 47 | 63.8% | +4 | +26 |
| White | 450 | 80.4% | +5 | +19 |
| Asian | 148 | 89.9% | +3 | +16 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlotte Wood Middle ← | — | 63 | 38.1% | 73.5% | −8.7 | 1.6% |
| Iron Horse Middle | 2.3 mi | 78 | 48.4% | 78.6% | +7.5 | 1.6% |
| Los Cerros Middle | 2.6 mi | 72 | 39.7% | 73.6% | +3.0 | 2.6% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 53 | 77 | #452 | 35.7% | 72.0% | 3.9% | 2.6% | -13.6pp |
| 2022 | 55 | 84 | #355 | 27.6% | 63.5% | 9.8% | 0.6% | -6.2pp |
| 2023 | 58 | 82 | #382 | 30.7% | 65.5% | 11.8% | 1.1% | -13.6pp |
| 2024 | 56 | 83 | #374 | 31.1% | 65.6% | 8.5% | 1.9% | -15.2pp |
| 2025 | 63 | 88 | #262 | 38.1% | 73.5% | 5.7% | 1.6% | -8.7pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4.0% | 6.9% | +2.9pp |
| Male | 3.8% | 4.1% | +0.3pp |
| Asian | 1.0% | 2.5% | +1.5pp |
| White | 5.3% | 0.0% | -5.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 3.9% | 13.0% | +9.1pp |
| Two or More Races | 3.9% | 5.7% | +1.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 9.8% | 9.6% | -0.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 10.2% | 9.4% | -0.8pp |
| All Students | 3.9% | 5.5% | +1.6pp |
| English Learners | — | 14.3% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction