Redwood Middle: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.
Redwood posts 65.5% exceeding the standard — versus 16.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 88 | 65% | 90% | +1.4 | 4.5% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
Redwood Middle scores 88 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 99th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “90% proficient” and call it done. Redwood deserves a closer read. It sits at the 99th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
The headline number: 65.5% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 16.8%.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 99th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 90% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 91% | 88% | 89% | 86% | 89% |
| Grade 7 | 87% | 91% | 83% | 91% | 88% |
| Grade 8 | 87% | 83% | 86% | 81% | 90% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 93% | 85% | 89% | 92% | 89% |
| Grade 7 | 89% | 88% | 86% | 89% | 93% |
| Grade 8 | 87% | 88% | 85% | 85% | 91% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 2.0pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Redwood Middle in Saratoga, 92.4% of asian students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 89.7% district-wide and 74.4% statewide. Redwood Middle outperforms its district average for asian students by 2.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Asian students (94.8% Math proficient); White students (78.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 460 students tested.
8 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$3 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 81% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Redwood Middle a good middle school?
What are Redwood Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does Redwood Middle rank in California?
Is Redwood Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Redwood Middle?
How does Redwood Middle compare to other schools in Saratoga?
How does Redwood Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 71
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 90
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 244 | 56% | 33% | 7% | 4% | 89% | +42 |
| Grade 7 | 221 | 55% | 33% | 9% | 3% | 88% | +41 |
| Grade 8 | 242 | 54% | 36% | 8% | 2% | 90% | +44 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 244 | 76% | 13% | 7% | 5% | 89% | +54 |
| Grade 7 | 220 | 73% | 20% | 6% | 1% | 93% | +59 |
| Grade 8 | 242 | 79% | 12% | 7% | 2% | 91% | +59 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 242 | 52% | 29% | 19% | 0% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asian | 460 | 92.4% | +3 | +18 |
| White | 131 | 78.6% | +1 | +17 |
| Two or More Races | 86 | 89.5% | +2 | +28 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redwood Middle ← | — | 88 | 65.5% | 89.9% | +1.4 | 0.1% |
| Joaquin Miller Middle | 2.3 mi | 89 | 72.6% | 91.0% | −0.9 | 1.0% |
| Rolling Hills Middle | 1.5 mi | 71 | 43.6% | 72.2% | −4.1 | 2.9% |
| Moreland Middle | 2.3 mi | 54 | 32.9% | 53.6% | −3.3 | 5.4% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 81 | 99 | #23 | 65.9% | 88.9% | 4.2% | 0.9% | -4.7pp |
| 2022 | 83 | 99 | #24 | 62.8% | 87.1% | 3.5% | 1.6% | -1.2pp |
| 2023 | 89 | 99 | #15 | 61.3% | 86.1% | 4.1% | 1.0% | -3.7pp |
| 2024 | 82 | 98 | #44 | 61.8% | 87.3% | 6.0% | 0.6% | -5.9pp |
| 2025 | 88 | 99 | #15 | 65.5% | 89.9% | 4.5% | 0.1% | +1.4pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.5% | 4.3% | +0.8pp |
| Male | 4.7% | 4.1% | -0.6pp |
| Asian | 2.9% | 2.8% | -0.1pp |
| Filipino | 0.0% | 1.9% | +1.9pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 8.7% | 11.1% | +2.4pp |
| Two or More Races | 4.5% | 0.0% | -4.5pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 11.8% | 15.3% | +3.5pp |
| English Learners | 4.3% | 0.0% | -4.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 17.9% | 13.0% | -4.9pp |
| All Students | 4.1% | 4.2% | +0.1pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction