Top: San Ramon Valley Unified’s other 21 scored elementary schools. Bottom: California’s 5,728 scored public elementary schools by Scope Score, spring 2026 tests. How it’s built ›
Scope Score
68 / 100
Weighted composite · 2026 Not a grade or a test result.
Country Clubhigher than 91 of the 100 California dotsand 4 of San Ramon Valley Unified’s 21 others
San Ramon Valley Unified’s other 21 schools · 1 dot each
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Country Clubhigher than 91 of the 100 California dotsand 4 of San Ramon Valley Unified’s 21 others
San Ramon Valley Unified’s other 21 schools · 1 dot each
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Country Clubhigher than 91 of the 100 California dotsand 4 of San Ramon Valley Unified’s 21 others
San Ramon Valley Unified’s other 21 schools · 1 dot each
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 66% and 69% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 222 in English, 223 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
43%
Proficient
26%
Below Proficient
31%
69% proficient or advanced · 223 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
San Ramon Valley Unified
Advanced
43%
21%
53%
Proficient
26%
21%
26%
Developing
15%
25%
13%
Minimal
16%
33%
8%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
Things worth knowing
Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–5 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Exceptional in English and Accelerated in math.grades 4–5 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 4–5: 143
Comparison
143 students in grades 4–5 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About 2 in 5 reached the top of the state’s four levels, about twice California’s rate in the same grades (24% and 21%).grades 3–5 · spring 2026
43%English · exceeded the standard43%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 222 in English, 223 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
33% of the 42 English learners tested here reached the top level of the state’s English test in 2025–26, against 16% at the average California elementary school.2025–26
33%English learners reaching the top level of the state’s English test
The California figure is an average of school rates (4,697 scored California elementary schools), our calculation.
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school66%
California46%
Tested: 222 here · 1,208,894 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school66%
San Ramon Valley Unified78%
Tested: 222 here · 5,606 in San Ramon Valley Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 22 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
San Ramon Valley Unified
Advanced
43%
24%
51%
Proficient
23%
22%
27%
Developing
17%
21%
13%
Minimal
17%
33%
9%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school69%
California42%
Tested: 223 here · 1,211,701 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school69%
San Ramon Valley Unified79%
Tested: 223 here · 5,610 in San Ramon Valley Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 22 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
San Ramon Valley Unified
Advanced
43%
21%
53%
Proficient
26%
21%
26%
Developing
15%
25%
13%
Minimal
16%
33%
8%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Progress over time
How have test results changed?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Country ClubCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID66%46%
Country ClubCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Country ClubCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID69%42%
Country ClubCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English was 66% in both 2017 and 2026. Math went from 63% in 2017 to 69% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Country Club
California
2015
66% 260 tested
41% 1,396,572 tested
2016
68% 259 tested
45% 1,395,534 tested
2017
66% 250 tested
45% 1,384,680 tested
2018
73% 251 tested
49% 1,346,907 tested
2019
71% 268 tested
50% 1,332,547 tested
2022
75% 241 tested
45% 1,260,830 tested
2023
71% 248 tested
44% 1,247,801 tested
2024
66% 241 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
72% 229 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
66% 222 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Country Club
California
2015
58% 260 tested
35% 1,401,446 tested
2016
66% 259 tested
39% 1,401,413 tested
2017
63% 250 tested
40% 1,392,040 tested
2018
71% 251 tested
42% 1,352,321 tested
2019
73% 268 tested
44% 1,338,625 tested
2022
71% 241 tested
38% 1,265,943 tested
2023
71% 248 tested
40% 1,256,519 tested
2024
63% 240 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
71% 226 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
69% 223 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure143 students · grades 4–5 · 2025
English+26ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+9ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 26 points above that prediction, and in math 9 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
8 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
7in 100 at the average San Ramon Valley Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
41 of 483 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school8 in 100
at the average San Ramon Valley Unified school7 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
0.8%of students were suspended at least once (4 of 490), 2025–26
0.6%at the average San Ramon Valley Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Reviews & community voices
Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace
Parent voices
Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Teacher & staff voices
School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.
Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–5 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
43 tested per subject
English
26% / 36%
Math
26% / 31%
Asian
116 tested per subject
English
72% / 70%
Math
80% / 71%
Students with disabilities
40 tested per subject
English
23% / 19%
Math
20% / 18%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–5 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs San Ramon Valley Unified
vs California
Low-income · 43 tested
English
26%
−2955%
−1036%
Math
26%
−2652%
−531%
Asian · 116 tested
English
72%
−1183%
+270%
Math
80%
−787%
+971%
Students with disabilities · 40 tested
English
23%
−1942%
+419%
Math
20%
−2242%
+218%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in San Ramon Valley Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
Hispanic or Latino and White students and English learners: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
How each student group did
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Country Club Elementary in San Ramon, 25.6% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 54.7% district-wide for those same grades and 35.6% statewide for those same grades. Country Club Elementary’s rate for low-income students trails its district average by 29.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (25.6% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (72.4% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 63.1 percentage points: students with disabilities in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 43 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian48%
2White20%
3Hispanic or Latino16%
4Two or more races8%
5Filipino4%
6Black or African American2%
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share2%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
48%
White
20%
Hispanic or Latino
16%
Two or more races
8%
Filipino
4%
Black or African American
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 6 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (15%, 74 of 500). California: 63%.
86% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 85.78%: 21.4 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 24.9 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask San Ramon Valley Unified which school serves your address.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
White Oak ElementaryLas Virgenes Unified · 365 enrolled · 14.8% meal eligibility
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 6.8–22.8% meal eligibility and 250–1,000 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Country Club Elementary a good elementary school?
Country Club Elementary is in the 91st percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 68 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Country Club Elementary was well above California in English and math: 66% and 69% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Country Club Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 66% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 69% the math standard; 43% and 43% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 222 students were tested in English and 223 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Country Club Elementary rank in California?
Country Club Elementary is in the 91st percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Country Club Elementary ranks #488 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Country Club Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Country Club Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 92nd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Country Club Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 8.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 41 chronically absent of 483 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.8%; 4 unduplicated suspended students of 490 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 9.0%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.9%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Country Club Elementary compare to other schools in San Ramon?
Country Club Elementary is in the 91st percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 500 students. Use the schools in San Ramon page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Country Club Elementary?
At Country Club Elementary in San Ramon, 25.6% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 54.7% district-wide for those same grades and 35.6% statewide for those same grades. Country Club Elementary’s rate for low-income students trails its district average by 29.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (25.6% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (72.4% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 63.1 percentage points: students with disabilities in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 43 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does Country Club Elementary feed into?
By attendance boundary, Country Club Elementary is zoned to Pine Valley Middle. Pine Valley Middle has a Scope Score of 80 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 70 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 69 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈92nd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 63 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 1.8pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 57 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.8pp higher vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 76 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
89
48%
16%
19%
17%
64%
+21
Grade 4
68
37%
26%
18%
19%
63%
+19
Grade 5
65
43%
28%
14%
15%
71%
+23
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools
State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
90
48%
21%
12%
19%
69%
+23
Grade 4
68
35%
38%
19%
7%
74%
+32
Grade 5
65
43%
22%
14%
22%
65%
+29
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools
State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
77
70.1%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
68
66.2%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
84
79.8%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
74
77.0%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
68
67.7%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
84
67.9%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
74
52.7%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
83
68.7%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
84
73.8%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
74
63.5%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
83
69.9%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
83
55.4%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA
81
66.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA
77
67.5%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
90
76.7%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math
81
74.1%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math
77
68.8%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
90
71.1%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA
75
69.3%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA
83
72.3%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
83
81.9%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math
75
74.7%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math
83
71.1%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
83
68.7%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA
105
67.6%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA
86
76.7%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
77
68.8%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math
105
74.3%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math
86
75.6%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
77
67.5%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA
89
78.7%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA
73
65.8%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
89
74.2%
2018 · Grade 3 · Math
89
83.2%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math
73
65.8%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
89
62.9%
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA
70
71.4%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA
91
63.7%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
89
65.2%
2017 · Grade 3 · Math
70
70.0%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math
91
62.6%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
89
58.4%
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA
83
65%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA
88
68%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
88
72%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math
83
77%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math
88
61%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
88
61%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA
83
66%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA
87
60%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
90
71%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math
83
75%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math
87
51%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
90
49%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
65
26%
35%
26%
12%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
43
25.6%
−29
−10
Asian
116
72.4%
−11
+3
Students with Disabilities
40
22.5%
−19
+4
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Scroll for more columns →
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year
Scope Score
Percentile
Rank
Comparison group
2019
66/100
88
#622
California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
45.0%
71.8%
6.1%
0.6%
-2.8pp
2022
—
—
—
44.5%
73.0%
14.2%
0.8%
+3.3pp
2023
—
—
—
50.4%
70.8%
18.4%
0.9%
+3.5pp
2024
—
—
—
39.9%
64.0%
15.6%
0.3%
+6.5pp
2025
—
—
—
43.7%
71.4%
10.9%
0.1%
+0.2pp
2026
68
91
#488
42.4%
67.5%
9.0%
0.9%
+1.2pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
3.7%
7.4%
+3.7pp
Male
7.7%
9.6%
+1.9pp
Asian
3.3%
3.8%
+0.5pp
Black/African American
—
18.2%
—
Filipino
0.0%
11.1%
+11.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
11.8%
20.5%
+8.7pp
Two or More Races
4.4%
2.6%
-1.8pp
White
7.8%
10.5%
+2.7pp
Students with Disabilities
12.8%
21.9%
+9.1pp
English Learners
9.8%
7.3%
-2.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
12.7%
20.0%
+7.3pp
All Students
5.8%
8.5%
+2.7pp
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+26
143
Exceptional
+9
143
Accelerated
English Only
+28
92
not categorised
+7
92
not categorised
Asian
+18
62
Accelerated
+14
62
Accelerated
White
+34
37
Exceptional
+11
37
Accelerated
Students with Disabilities
+18
31
Accelerated
+1
31
Average
English Learner
+2
29
Average
+11
29
Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+24
20
Exceptional
+1
20
Average
Hispanic or Latino
+23
18
Exceptional
−2
18
Average
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+2
18
not categorised
+13
18
not categorised
Two or More Races
+17
14
Accelerated
+4
14
Average
English Learners Only
−5
11
not categorised
0
11
not categorised
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
31%
exceeded standard · 53% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 74 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
43%
exceeded standard · 71% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 65 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 65 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
143 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +26 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 98th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.98th pctile · +26 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
143 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +9 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 73rd percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.73rd pctile · +9 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$12,168 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 30,726 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$53 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 500
Central federal expenditures attributed here$706 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 500
District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,036 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94583
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94583
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$184,898
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
64.93%
ZCTA population
39,583
Median age
40.8 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.