Country Club Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Country Club posts 71% meeting the standard, and 43.7% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 70 | 44% | 71% | +0.2 | 10.9% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Country Club Elementary scores 70 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 92nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.
Most rating sites would stop at “71% proficient” and call it done. Country Club deserves a closer read. It sits at the 92nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
Country Club's low-income kids hit 55.2% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 92nd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 71% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 68% | 69% | 67% | 53% | 70% |
| Grade 4 | 77% | 72% | 68% | 69% | 66% |
| Grade 5 | 69% | 82% | 77% | 74% | 80% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74% | 75% | 74% | 64% | 77% |
| Grade 4 | 76% | 71% | 69% | 70% | 68% |
| Grade 5 | 68% | 69% | 71% | 55% | 68% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 15.5pp across grades; the floor rises 9.6pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Country Club Elementary in San Ramon, 55.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Country Club Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.7% Math proficient); Asian students (78.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 27.7 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 29 students tested.
9 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (14.4% vs 6.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$53 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 73% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Country Club Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Country Club Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Country Club Elementary rank in California?
Is Country Club Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Country Club Elementary?
How does Country Club Elementary compare to other schools in San Ramon?
How does Country Club Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 82
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 77 | 43% | 27% | 16% | 14% | 70% | +27 |
| Grade 4 | 68 | 43% | 24% | 22% | 12% | 66% | +21 |
| Grade 5 | 84 | 58% | 21% | 10% | 11% | 80% | +32 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 74 | 35% | 42% | 14% | 9% | 77% | +31 |
| Grade 4 | 68 | 31% | 37% | 19% | 13% | 68% | +26 |
| Grade 5 | 84 | 52% | 15% | 18% | 14% | 68% | +33 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 84 | 45% | 27% | 20% | 7% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 29 | 55.2% | −5 | +17 |
| Asian | 118 | 78.8% | −8 | +4 |
| White | 38 | 86.8% | +12 | +25 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country Club Elementary ← | — | 70 | 43.7% | 71.4% | +0.2 | 0.1% |
| Bollinger Canyon Elementary | 2.8 mi | 88 | 59.9% | 85.3% | +4.1 | 0.5% |
| Neil A. Armstrong Elementary | 1 mi | 84 | 58.0% | 85.3% | −13.4 | 0.5% |
| Walt Disney Elementary | 0.9 mi | 76 | 43.4% | 71.0% | +18.6 | 0.7% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 66 | 87 | #726 | 45.0% | 71.8% | 5.9% | 0.5% | -2.8pp |
| 2022 | 65 | 91 | #518 | 44.5% | 73.0% | 13.5% | 0.8% | +3.3pp |
| 2023 | 73 | 94 | #336 | 50.4% | 70.8% | 18.1% | 0.9% | +3.5pp |
| 2024 | 59 | 81 | #1077 | 39.9% | 64.0% | 15.6% | 0.3% | +6.5pp |
| 2025 | 70 | 92 | #488 | 43.7% | 71.4% | 10.9% | 0.1% | +0.2pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.7% | 7.1% | +3.4pp |
| Male | 7.7% | 13.9% | +6.2pp |
| Asian | 3.3% | 8.1% | +4.8pp |
| White | 0.0% | 11.1% | +11.1pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.8% | 20.8% | +9.0pp |
| Two or More Races | 4.4% | 4.5% | +0.1pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 12.8% | 19.8% | +7.0pp |
| English Learners | 9.8% | 9.2% | -0.6pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 12.7% | 17.6% | +4.9pp |
| All Students | 5.8% | 10.4% | +4.6pp |
| Black/African American | — | 7.1% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction