School district · Alameda County

Fremont Unified schools

Fremont Unified’s 29 public elementary schools run from the 44th to the 99th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 29 schools

from 44th to 99th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

0Needs Support
3Developing
3Solid
23Strong

Each column counts the schools in one five-percentile step; the number above it is that count.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 6 schools

from 66th to 97th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • William Hopkins Middle: 97th percentile, Strong
  • John M. Horner Middle: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Thornton Middle: 93rd percentile, Strong
  • Centerville Middle: 77th percentile, Strong
  • Circle of Independent Learning: 69th percentile, Solid
  • G. M. Walters Middle: 66th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
2Solid
4Strong

High · 6 schools

from 32nd to 98th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Mission San Jose High: 98th percentile, Strong
  • Irvington High: 97th percentile, Strong
  • American High: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Washington High: 86th percentile, Strong
  • John F. Kennedy High: 54th percentile, Solid
  • Circle of Independent Learning: 32nd percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
1Solid
4Strong

Each column counts the schools in one five-percentile step; the number above it is that count. One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 39 ranked schools teaches all three levels, so it appears in more than one picture.

  • 39 ranked schools
  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Fremont Unified

40 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Fremont Unified score highest?

Fred E. Weibel Elementary and Mission San Jose Elementary are highest, both at the 99th percentile.

That’s higher than 99 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Fremont Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 26 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Fremont Unified had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Fremont Unified score highest?

William Hopkins Middle is highest, at the 97th percentile.

That’s higher than 97 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Fremont Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 3 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Fremont Unified had 7 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Fremont Unified score highest?

Mission San Jose High is highest, at the 98th percentile.

That’s higher than 98 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Fremont Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 3 high schools
Context

The average high school in Fremont Unified had 11 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

1 high school not ranked statewide

The district

Where does Fremont Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Fremont Unified spent $16,597 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 64 cents of every Fremont Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction64%
  • Instruction support11%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%
  • Other2%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$52.4 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 42 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 10% of its $545.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 239 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Facilities, School Counselors and Support multilingual families take 59% of the money. The plan itself puts 85% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

6 of the plan’s 42 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.5 million
  • Math $0.2 million
  • Catch-up help $1.5 million
  • English learners $1.7 million

Largest of these

  • Credit Recovery$1.5 million
  • Address the needs of newcomers and Long Term English Learners (LTEL)$1.2 million
  • Fostering Literacy$466,266
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $29.6 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $28.4 million and estimates it spent $27.6 million, $0.8 million (3%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $3.8 million (8%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is School Counselors, which went from $10.7 million to $14.0 million.

Largest cuts

  • Therapeutic Services−⁠$2.4 million
  • Address the needs of newcomers and Long Term English Learners (LTEL)−⁠$1.8 million
  • Expanded learning opportunities for EL−⁠$299,234

Largest increases

  • School Counselors+⁠$3.3 million
  • Unduplicated Student Proficiency+⁠$833,194
  • School-To-Home Connectedness+⁠$740,323

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Differentiated Mathematics Instruction$199,341

Ask: What did Therapeutic Services pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $2.4 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 2 and 369%68%down 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 411 in 10011 in 100no change
Suspended at least onceGoals 2 and 42.5%2.0%down 0.5 pts

Goal 5 tracks named schools and Goal 1 tracks other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Facilities · $14,985,406
  • School Counselors · $14,010,172
  • Support multilingual families · $2,081,260
The full plan5 goals, 54 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($52.4 million).

Where does the money go?

48% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1 · Focus GoalImprove outcomes for unduplicated students by targeting resources to provide research based interventions…$5.5 million11% of action budgets

“Improve outcomes for unduplicated students by targeting resources to provide research based interventions that address the needs of students and identified areas of disproportionality” p. 24 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $7.0 million (−⁠$1.4 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Support multilingual families$2.1 millionaction 1.4 · p. 185 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Address the needs of newcomers and Long Term English Learners (LTEL)$1.2 millionaction 1.3 · p. 185 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Kennedy and Robertson High Schools$0.8 millionaction 1.7 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Special Education Coaching$0.4 millionaction 1.6 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Unhoused transportation and mentorship$0.3 millionaction 1.8 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • LTEL support · action 1.9 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $274,620 is state funding counted toward those services$0.3 million
  • Dual Immersion Programs · action 1.2 · p. 185 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Expanded learning opportunities for EL · action 1.10 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Peer Assistance and Review · action 1.5 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Access to Technology · action 1.1 · p. 185 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Address the needs of newcomers and Long Term English Learners (LTEL)−⁠$1.8 million$3.0 million → $1.2 million · p. 185 ↗
  2. Expanded learning opportunities for EL−⁠$299,234$406,234 → $107,000 · p. 186 ↗
  3. LTEL support+⁠$224,620$100,000 → $324,620 · p. 186 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Support multilingual families · $2.0 million → $2.1 million · p. 185 ↗+⁠$41,035
  • Kennedy and Robertson High Schools · $713,042 → $805,123 · p. 186 ↗+⁠$92,081
  • Special Education Coaching · $292,647 → $379,242 · p. 186 ↗+⁠$86,595
  • Unhoused transportation and mentorship · $177,172 → $335,129 · p. 186 ↗+⁠$157,957
  • Dual Immersion Programs · $175,000 → $250,000 · p. 185 ↗+⁠$75,000
  • Peer Assistance and Review · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 186 ↗unchanged
  • Access to Technology · $30,000 → $5,000 · p. 185 ↗−⁠$25,000

How the plan measures it · 12 measures · 3 quoted

  • Allocation and distribution of Chromebooks and network hotspots to unduplicated students p. 24 ↗
    Baseline
    100% (source: FUSD Instructional Services)
    Target for year 3
    100% of requests received by unduplicated students provided with technology support.
  • The number of students served with supplemental transportation will be tracked. Increased attendance rate will be tracked p. 30 ↗
    Baseline
    2024-25: 81 students
    Target for year 3
    86 students
  • Students have access to Common Core State Standards (CCSS) aligned instructional materials p. 31 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-24: 100% (source: FUSD Instructional Services)
    Target for year 3
    100%

9 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2 · Focus GoalExpand an effective Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) to eliminate barriers to improve academic…$25.3 million48% of action budgets

“Expand an effective Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) to eliminate barriers to improve academic, behavioral, and emotional wellness outcomes for students” p. 43 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $19.4 million (+⁠$5.9 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. School Counselors$14.0 millionaction 2.10 · p. 188 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $6.6 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Extended Learning Opportunities$1.5 millionaction 2.4 · p. 187 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. PBIS$1.5 millionaction 2.9 · p. 188 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Unduplicated Student Proficiency$1.2 millionaction 2.5 · p. 187 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Instructional Coaches$0.7 millionaction 2.2 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Wellness Centers · action 2.8 · p. 188 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Fostering Literacy · action 2.3 · p. 187 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Tier 1 Instruction · action 2.1 · p. 186 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. School Counselors+⁠$3.3 million$10.7 million → $14.0 million · p. 188 ↗
  2. Unduplicated Student Proficiency+⁠$0.8 million$0.3 million → $1.2 million · p. 187 ↗
  3. PBIS+⁠$0.4 million$1.0 million → $1.5 million · p. 188 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Title not confirmed · $5.2 million · p. 187 ↗not compared
  • Extended Learning Opportunities · $1.3 million → $1.5 million · p. 187 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Instructional Coaches · $642,321 → $690,437 · p. 186 ↗+⁠$48,116
  • Wellness Centers · $654,069 → $531,593 · p. 188 ↗−⁠$122,476
  • Fostering Literacy · $542,200 → $466,266 · p. 187 ↗−⁠$75,934
  • Tier 1 Instruction · $200,000 → $225,680 · p. 186 ↗+⁠$25,680

How the plan measures it · 10 measures · 1 quoted

  • Percentage of staff responses that indicated professional development had some or high impact on their ability to better serve student groups p. 45 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-24: All Students (93.3%) • …
    Target for year 3
    All Students (100%) • …

9 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3 · Focus GoalAlign P-12 systems to help increase post secondary preparation and attainment$3.2 million6% of action budgets

11 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.9 million (−⁠$1.7 million) · p. 73 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Credit Recovery$1.5 millionaction 3.4 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Professional Development$0.5 millionaction 3.1 · p. 188 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Therapeutic Services$0.4 millionaction 3.8 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Dual Enrollment$0.2 millionaction 3.6 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Differentiated Mathematics Instruction$0.2 millionaction 3.7 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

6 more funded actions in this goal

  • Multilingual Learner Graduation Outcomes · action 3.3 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • COST Program · action 3.10 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Post-Secondary Opportunities · action 3.11 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • PSAT/​NMSQT · action 3.5 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • College Readiness · action 3.2 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • MESA Program · action 3.9 · p. 189 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Therapeutic Services−⁠$2.4 million$2.8 million → $0.4 million · p. 189 ↗
  2. Credit Recovery+⁠$0.5 million$1.0 million → $1.5 million · p. 189 ↗
  3. Post-Secondary Opportunities+⁠$33,619$30,000 → $63,619 · p. 190 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Professional Development · $491,500 → $461,200 · p. 188 ↗−⁠$30,300
  • Dual Enrollment · $211,735 → $206,337 · p. 189 ↗−⁠$5,398
  • Differentiated Mathematics Instruction · $199,341 · p. 189 ↗new or renamed
  • Multilingual Learner Graduation Outcomes · $168,439 → $174,585 · p. 189 ↗+⁠$6,146
  • COST Program · $89,960 → $104,529 · p. 190 ↗+⁠$14,569
  • PSAT/​NMSQT · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 189 ↗unchanged
  • College Readiness · $30,000 → $12,000 · p. 189 ↗−⁠$18,000
  • MESA Program · $10,000 → $12,000 · p. 189 ↗+⁠$2,000

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 17 measures · 1 quoted

  • Percentage of students who received a high school diploma within four or five years of entering ninth grade p. 74 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23: Overall (92.8%) • …
    Target for year 3
    Overall (95.8%) • …

16 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4 · Focus GoalEnhance student, family and staff connectedness by fostering and supporting an inclusive school culture$18.1 million35% of action budgets

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $17.0 million (+⁠$1.1 million) · p. 100 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Facilities$15.0 millionaction 4.6 · p. 190 ↗
  2. School-To-Home Connectedness$1.8 millionaction 4.4 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Wrap Around Services$0.3 millionaction 4.1 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Chronic Absenteeism$0.3 millionaction 4.2 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Ant-Bias and Culturally Responsive Instruction$0.3 millionaction 4.8 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Restorative Practices · action 4.3 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Family Engagement · action 4.5 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Supplemental Academic Programs · action 4.9 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Native American Students · action 4.7 · p. 190 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. School-To-Home Connectedness+⁠$0.7 million$1.0 million → $1.8 million · p. 190 ↗
  2. Ant-Bias and Culturally Responsive Instruction+⁠$220,000$80,000 → $300,000 · p. 190 ↗
  3. Family Engagement−⁠$190,287$281,449 → $91,162 · p. 190 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Facilities · $15.0 million → $15.0 million · p. 190 ↗unchanged
  • Wrap Around Services · $184,990 → $348,172 · p. 190 ↗+⁠$163,182
  • Chronic Absenteeism · $262,670 → $318,801 · p. 190 ↗+⁠$56,131
  • Restorative Practices · $50,000 → $200,000 · p. 190 ↗+⁠$150,000
  • Supplemental Academic Programs · $65,000 → $65,000 · p. 190 ↗unchanged
  • Native American Students · $26,786 → $25,401 · p. 190 ↗−⁠$1,385

How the plan measures it · 13 measures · 3 quoted

  • Rate of Chronic Absenteeism p. 103 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23: All Students (12.8%) • …
    Target for year 3
    All Students (10.0%) • …
  • Suspension Rate p. 104 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23: All Students (1.7%) • …
    Target for year 3
    All Students (1.1%) • …
  • Percentage of interactive CAASPP Student Score Reports, with included next-step resources, accessed by unduplicated families p. 116 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-24: 27% of CAASPP VSSRs accessed (Baseline established in 2024-25)
    Target for year 3
    100% (Baseline established in 2024-25)

10 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy June 2027, Robertson High will: Reduce overall suspension rates by 10% to improve school climate and…$271,3861% of action budgets

“By June 2027, Robertson High will: Reduce overall suspension rates by 10% to improve school climate and student outcomes. • Particular focus will be placed on English Learners, Hispanic Students, Long-Term English Learners (LTELs), Socioeconomically Disadvantaged (SED), Students with Disabilities (SWD), and White Students, who were previously identified in Red on the 2024 California School Dashboard. Increase overall College & Career Readiness (CCI) rates by 20% to expand post-secondary opportunities for students. • Particular focus will be placed on Hispanic and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged (SED) students, who were previously identified in Red on the California School Dashboard” p. 126 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $271,386 (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. Graduation Progress Monitoring$126,386action 5.3 · p. 191 ↗
  2. Mental Health Coaching & SEL$80,000action 5.2 · p. 191 ↗
  3. Eliminate barriers through transportation$65,000action 5.1 · p. 190 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Graduation Progress Monitoring · $126,386 → $126,386 · p. 191 ↗unchanged
  • Mental Health Coaching & SEL · $80,000 → $80,000 · p. 191 ↗unchanged
  • Eliminate barriers through transportation · $65,000 → $65,000 · p. 190 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 2 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 126 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 33,134 students
1. Asian: 65%2. Hispanic or Latino: 16%3. White: 7%4. Filipino: 4%5. Two or more races: 4%6. Black or African American: 2%7. Not reported: 1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Asian65%
  2. Hispanic or Latino16%
  3. White7%
  4. Filipino4%
  5. Two or more races4%
  6. Black or African American2%
  7. Not reported1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

30%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 9,867 of 32,502 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Fremont Unified extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 50% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (1,877 of 3,741 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Robertson High (Continuation) (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Fremont Unified rank highest?

Elementary: 2 schools at the 99th percentile (Strong): Fred E. Weibel Elementary and Mission San Jose Elementary. Middle: William Hopkins Middle, 97th percentile (Strong). High: Mission San Jose High, 98th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Fremont Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Fremont Unified good?

Fremont Unified’s 29 public elementary schools run from the 44th to the 99th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 23 Strong, 3 Solid and 3 Developing. Fremont Unified’s 6 public middle schools run from the 66th to the 97th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong and 2 Solid. Fremont Unified’s 6 public high schools run from the 32nd to the 98th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 4 Strong, 1 Solid and 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Fremont Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Fremont Unified had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Fremont Unified had 7 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Fremont Unified had 11 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Fremont Unified spend per student?

Fremont Unified spent $16,597 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 64 cents of every Fremont Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Fremont Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $52.4 million into 42 funded actions in 5 goals, 10% of its $545.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $25.3 million, 48% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Fremont Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.