ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Tom Maloney Elementary · Fremont

Tom Maloney Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Tom Maloney posts 61% meeting the standard, and 39.1% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

38700 Logan Drive, 94536 (opens in new tab)·Fremont Unified·Fremont·Grades TK-5·551 students·39% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 797-4426·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6045
% Exceeded39%21%
% Met+61%43%
Growth-10.4-2.9
Absence11.5%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
60
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #1,016 statewide · #18 of 29 in Fremont Unified

Tom Maloney Elementary scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 82nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “61% proficient” and call it done. Tom Maloney deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fremont, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 27.5% of English learners met the ELA standard — versus 10.4% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 93rd to the 82nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 61% meet the standard today, versus 77% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 375%74%72%61%69%
Grade 470%67%69%67%52%
Grade 584%59%63%68%60%
Grade 682%71%66%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 383%73%66%62%67%
Grade 474%66%71%64%60%
Grade 575%58%56%54%55%
Grade 669%61%54%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

40%
29%
31%
Grade 3 · 69% proficient
34%
18%
48%
Grade 4 · 52% proficient
40%
20%
40%
Grade 5 · 60% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor slips 9.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
39.1%
State 21.3%
17.8pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-10.4pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
60.5%
State 42.7%
17.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
11.5%
State 17.9%
6.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.1pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
23.0%
State 18.0%
5.1pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Tom Maloney Elementary in Fremont, 40.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 48.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Tom Maloney Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.3% Math proficient); Asian students (69.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 88 students tested.

All students at this school: 61% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 61%, district —, state 43%61%
AsianAsian: this school 74%, district 84%, state 72%74% · +14 vs school
MaleMale: this school 68%, district 70%, state 42%68% · +8 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 52%, district 72%, state 44%52% · −8 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 37%, district 44%, state 32%37% · −23 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 29%, district 18%, state 11%29% · −31 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 31%, state 32%28% · −32 vs school

8 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 18.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.5%, district 12.4%, state 17.9%11.5% · −6.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (14.8% vs 8.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–68.5%
TK/K14.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 25:126:1
Teaching staff28 teachers
Avg. experience13.3 years
Fully credentialed98%
First-year teachers7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$84,804 – $147,673
Principal salary$181,946 – $224,157
Superintendent salary$367,102

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,588, CA average $14,815$16,588 · spent at this school
Federal share$785 per student

$785 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,597 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,623 per pupil
2019$11,438 per pupil
2018$11,629 per pupil
2017$11,018 per pupil
2016$10,331 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian64.4%
District 64.4% · CA 10.2%
Hispanic16.3%
District 16.4% · CA 56.1%
Other12.3%
District 10.1% · CA 9.0%
White5.6%
District 7.3% · CA 19.9%
Black1.3%
District 1.8% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 38.8% (25pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$168K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.29M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+59% · CA 35%
ZIP population70,619
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 44% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Tom Maloney Elementary a good elementary school?

Tom Maloney Elementary has a Scope Score of 60 out of 100, placing it in the 82nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,016 statewide. 39.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 17.8 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Tom Maloney Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 60.5% of students at Tom Maloney Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 39.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 39.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 479 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Tom Maloney Elementary rank in California?

Tom Maloney Elementary ranks #1,016 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 82nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Tom Maloney Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Tom Maloney Elementary decreases by 10.4 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Tom Maloney Elementary?

11.5% of students at Tom Maloney Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Tom Maloney Elementary compare to other schools in Fremont?

Tom Maloney Elementary scores 60/100 (82nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 551 students. Use the schools in Fremont page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Tom Maloney Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Tom Maloney Elementary in Fremont, 40.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 48.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Tom Maloney Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 7.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.3% Math proficient); Asian students (69.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 88 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
39.1%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 67th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-10.4pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 52th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
60.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 64th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.5%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 60th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
23.0%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 58th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37740%29%14%17%69%+25
Grade 47334%18%22%26%52%+7
Grade 58240%20%20%21%60%+12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 38243%24%20%13%67%+21
Grade 48035%25%10%30%60%+18
Grade 58542%13%24%21%55%+20
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/118526%18%46%11%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8840.9%−8+3
Asian15369.9%−15−4
English Learners6927.5%+12+17
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Tom Maloney Elementary ←6039.1%60.5%−10.40.6%
Niles Elementary2.3 mi6750.1%75.3%−6.43.0%
Warwick Elementary2.8 mi6753.3%77.4%+0.40.1%
Parkmont Elementary1.3 mi6750.6%73.5%−0.90.9%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197493#36751.2%77.0%6.0%0.0%+0.3pp
20225380#115243.2%66.0%23.2%0.1%-15.0pp
20236185#83940.8%66.1%18.1%0.1%-9.0pp
20245374#147938.7%62.7%15.6%0.6%-0.4pp
20256082#101639.1%60.5%11.5%0.6%-10.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.8%12.4%+5.6pp
Male5.0%10.0%+5.0pp
Asian4.6%9.2%+4.6pp
Black/African American5.9%
White9.7%4.5%-5.2pp
Hispanic/Latino11.6%14.1%+2.5pp
Students with Disabilities8.2%14.7%+6.5pp
English Learners8.1%12.7%+4.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.1%14.3%+4.2pp
All Students5.9%11.1%+5.2pp
Filipino13.3%
Two or More Races11.5%
Homeless27.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction