John Gomes Elementary: Three in five kids exceed the standard. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.
John Gomes is one of the strongest elementary schools in Fremont by raw achievement. The catch worth understanding: the cohort doesn't gain ground year-over-year.
John Gomes Elementary scores 73 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 96th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “83% proficient” and call it done. John Gomes deserves a closer read. It sits at the 96th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
John Gomes's low-income kids hit 53.8% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
- This school73/100Strongelementary scale
- William Hopkins Middle94/100Strongmiddle scale
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 73 | 60% | 83% | Average · p48 | 5.7% | 1.0% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | Average · p50 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
The seven-year arc
Has held the 96th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 83% meet the standard today, versus 92% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 85% | 83% | 73% | 67% | 82% |
| Grade 4 | 94% | 94% | 88% | 77% | 81% |
| Grade 5 | 93% | 86% | 87% | 87% | 79% |
| Grade 6 | 92% | 90% | 93% | — | — |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 92% | 83% | 82% | 90% | 89% |
| Grade 4 | 93% | 92% | 89% | 83% | 87% |
| Grade 5 | 94% | 91% | 89% | 87% | 79% |
| Grade 6 | 87% | 96% | 89% | — | — |
Where its students land
The story this school is actually telling
of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.4%.
proficiency runs 86% in this year's grade 3 against 79% in its grade 5. The state average rises by +4.6pp over the same span.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor slips 3.3pp. The state average rises 4.6pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
John Gomes's most underrated number
53.8% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
returning cohort
Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.
California's own answer to the same question
California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 38th percentile of California elementary schools in reading and the 95th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 48th. A gap that size between math and reading in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.
- Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At John Gomes Elementary in Fremont, 53.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 48.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Gomes Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (55.0% Math proficient); Asian students (83.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 39 students tested.
7 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 1.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +2.7pp.
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
— 3 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (9.2% vs 4.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The road from this school ends at Mission San Jose High, which sent 101 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 22 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Mission San Jose High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 88% of Mission San Jose High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$863 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 71% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is John Gomes Elementary a good elementary school?
What are John Gomes Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does John Gomes Elementary rank in California?
Is John Gomes Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at John Gomes Elementary?
How does John Gomes Elementary compare to other schools in Fremont?
How does John Gomes Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
What middle school does John Gomes Elementary feed into?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 76
Nearby Middle Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 71
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 77
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 83 | 52% | 30% | 7% | 11% | 82% | +39 |
| Grade 4 | 89 | 64% | 17% | 9% | 10% | 81% | +36 |
| Grade 5 | 89 | 53% | 26% | 10% | 11% | 79% | +31 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 84 | 64% | 25% | 6% | 5% | 89% | +44 |
| Grade 4 | 89 | 72% | 15% | 9% | 4% | 87% | +45 |
| Grade 5 | 89 | 56% | 22% | 13% | 8% | 79% | +44 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 89 | 34% | 37% | 27% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 39 | 53.8% | +5 | +16 |
| Asian | 220 | 83.6% | −1 | +9 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Gomes Elementary ← | — | 73 | 60.2% | 82.7% | −7.0pp | +74 pts | 1.0% |
| Joshua Chadbourne Elementary | 0.7 mi | 81 | 71.3% | 84.7% | −8.4pp | — | 0.7% |
| Mission San Jose Elementary | 2.1 mi | 81 | 69.5% | 84.9% | −3.6pp | — | 0.3% |
| Mission Valley Elementary | 1 mi | 68 | 52.5% | 70.7% | +1.5pp | — | 0.6% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.4% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 94 | 99 | #15 | 76.5% | 91.8% | 3.6% | 1.0% | +5.5pp |
| 2022 | 93 | 99 | #38 | 69.6% | 88.3% | 11.2% | 0.5% | +5.2pp |
| 2023 | 87 | 99 | #69 | 65.6% | 84.4% | 9.5% | 0.8% | +10.5pp |
| 2024 | 79 | 98 | #108 | 61.7% | 81.8% | 8.3% | 0.7% | +7.6pp |
| 2025 | 73 | 96 | #234 | 60.2% | 82.7% | 5.7% | 1.0% | -7.0pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2.8% | 5.1% | +2.3pp |
| Male | 3.6% | 5.0% | +1.4pp |
| Asian | 1.5% | 4.4% | +2.9pp |
| Filipino | 8.3% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 18.2% | 8.7% | -9.5pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0pp |
| White | 14.6% | 20.0% | +5.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 17.6% | 9.8% | -7.8pp |
| English Learners | 5.8% | 8.6% | +2.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 18.2% | 9.6% | -8.6pp |
| All Students | 3.2% | 5.0% | +1.8pp |
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | −2 | 168 | Average | +23 | 168 | Exceptional |
| Asian | −3 | 142 | Average | +21 | 142 | Exceptional |
| English Only | −4 | 95 | not categorised | +19 | 95 | not categorised |
| English Learner | −9 | 30 | Moderate | +14 | 30 | Accelerated |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +1 | 26 | Average | +6 | 26 | Accelerated |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | −5 | 20 | not categorised | +8 | 20 | not categorised |
| Students with Disabilities | −25 | 13 | Minimal | +17 | 13 | Accelerated |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/john-gomes-elementary-6468"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="John Gomes Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction