ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Circle of Independent Learning · Fremont

Circle of Independent Learning: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Circle of Independent Learning posts 48% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

4700 Calaveras Avenue, 94538 (opens in new tab)·Fremont Unified·Fremont·Grades K-12·394 students·46% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 797-0100·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4745
% Exceeded32%21%
% Met+48%43%
Growth-2.9
Absence9.6%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
47
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #2,175 statewide · #25 of 29 in Fremont Unified

Circle of Independent Learning scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 62nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “48% proficient” and call it done. Circle of Independent Learning deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fremont, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 9.6% chronic absenteeism — versus 17.9% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.

As a charter, Circle of Independent Learning enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 94th to the 62nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 48% meet the standard today, versus 69% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%53%50%
Grade 442%58%62%57%
Grade 571%79%68%62%
Grade 682%62%31%33%70%
Grade 767%56%47%44%47%
Grade 862%58%30%67%43%
Grade 1159%61%55%46%67%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%53%43%
Grade 423%42%38%43%
Grade 567%32%53%31%
Grade 677%71%38%17%50%
Grade 764%47%39%26%21%
Grade 862%33%26%36%33%
Grade 1138%37%30%18%51%

The 4 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
31.6%
State 21.3%
10.3pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
48.1%
State 42.7%
5.4pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
9.6%
State 17.9%
8.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Circle of Independent Learning in Fremont, 42.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 48.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Circle of Independent Learning trails its district average for low-income students by 6.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.6% Math proficient); Asian students (66.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 16.9 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 66 students tested.

All students at this school: 50% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 50%, district —, state 43%50%
FemaleFemale: this school 53%, district 72%, state 44%53% · +3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 61%, district 84%, state 72%61% · +11 vs school
MaleMale: this school 49%, district 70%, state 42%49% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 44%, state 32%34% · −16 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 32%, district 31%, state 32%32% · −18 vs school

9 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 9.6%, district 12.4%, state 17.9%9.6% · −8.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–62.9%
Grades 7–82.8%
Grades 9–125.8%
TK/K0.0%

Where the path goes

Circle of Independent Learning serves grades K-12 — students can complete their entire K-12 education here, with no school-to-school transitions.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 25:125:1
Teaching staff17 teachers
Avg. experience9.6 years
Fully credentialed50%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$84,804 – $147,673
Principal salary$181,946 – $224,157
Superintendent salary$367,102

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,682, CA average $14,815$20,682 · spent at this school
Federal share$22 per student

$22 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,597 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction64%
Instruction support11%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,623 per pupil
2019$11,438 per pupil
2018$11,629 per pupil
2017$11,018 per pupil
2016$10,331 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian47.2%
District 64.4% · CA 10.2%
Hispanic25.9%
District 16.4% · CA 56.1%
White12.7%
District 7.3% · CA 19.9%
Other9.1%
District 10.1% · CA 9.0%
Black5.1%
District 1.8% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 46.2% (18pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$147K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.14M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+55% · CA 35%
ZIP population67,781
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 39% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Circle of Independent Learning a good elementary school?

Circle of Independent Learning has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 62nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,175 statewide. 31.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 10.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Circle of Independent Learning's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 48.1% of students at Circle of Independent Learning met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 31.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 31.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 54 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Circle of Independent Learning rank in California?

Circle of Independent Learning ranks #2,175 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 62nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Circle of Independent Learning?

9.6% of students at Circle of Independent Learning are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Circle of Independent Learning compare to other schools in Fremont?

Circle of Independent Learning scores 47/100 (62nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 394 students. Use the schools in Fremont page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Circle of Independent Learning serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Circle of Independent Learning in Fremont, 42.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 48.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Circle of Independent Learning trails its district average for low-income students by 6.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.6% Math proficient); Asian students (66.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 16.9 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 66 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
31.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 60th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
48.1%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 54th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
9.6%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 64th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39
Grade 41443%14%29%14%57%+12
Grade 51346%15%15%23%62%+14
Grade 63020%50%13%17%70%+23
Grade 7195%42%21%32%47%−0
Grade 84020%23%20%38%43%−4
Grade 115547%20%22%11%67%+20
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39
Grade 41414%29%43%14%43%+1
Grade 51323%8%31%38%31%−5
Grade 63030%20%20%30%50%+15
Grade 7190%21%32%47%21%−13
Grade 84028%5%8%60%33%+0
Grade 115330%21%21%28%51%+28
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1110614%25%50%11%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6642.4%−6+4
Asian6966.7%−18−8
Hispanic/Latino2445.8%+8+7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Circle of Independent Learning ←4731.6%48.1%0.6%
Lila Bringhurst Elementary3.5 mi7758.4%79.7%+5.60.3%
Harvey Green Elementary2.3 mi7049.6%75.8%+1.41.0%
Niles Elementary2.7 mi6750.1%75.3%−6.43.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197494#34947.6%69.0%4.4%0.1%
20224264#209421.3%53.5%6.2%0.0%-17.5pp
20236286#78537.1%51.7%8.0%0.1%
20245678#127632.5%52.3%8.3%0.4%+14.1pp
20254762#217531.6%48.1%9.6%0.6%
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Growth data isn't available — the state needs matched grades across years to compute it.
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.0%3.2%-2.8pp
Male1.9%6.6%+4.7pp
Asian0.6%1.4%+0.8pp
Black/African American25.0%8.7%-16.3pp
White0.0%9.1%+9.1pp
Hispanic/Latino5.1%6.1%+1.0pp
Two or More Races9.5%18.8%+9.3pp
Students with Disabilities3.8%3.5%-0.3pp
English Learners2.0%6.4%+4.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.2%8.1%-0.1pp
All Students3.9%4.9%+1.0pp
Homeless16.7%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction