English
49%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
27243118Los Angeles Unified59%California57%
LAUSD affiliated charter · Los Angeles Unified
Reseda Charter High — Rating & test scores
18230 Kittridge Street, Reseda · 1,339 students · Grades 6–12
Missed LAUSD Choices? Late applications open , and join the end of the waitlist.
Applying for 2027–28. From LAUSD’s Choices brochure ↗.
How to enrollSee what changed
Compare
Compare schools
Choose up to four high schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Save
Spring 2026 state test results
Reseda Charter High’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Shared campus · © OpenStreetMap
Reseda Charter High and Zane Grey Continuation share this address in the state’s school directory. OpenStreetMap maps the grounds as one campus. Which buildings each school uses here isn’t mapped.
The California School Campus Database records Magnolia Science Academy 5 on this campus too; it gives each school the whole campus, so this drawing doesn’t show which buildings each uses.
Drawn from OpenStreetMap, with building heights from LA County. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
Scope Score 73
DevelopingScope Score · 40th percentile. Higher than 40 in 100 of the 1,498 California public high schools we score.
Needs SupportDevelopingSolidStrong
75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built
In 2024–25, 92% of the class graduated in four years (319 of 345); across California, 89%.
Source for this line
- Source
- CDE four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR), 2024–25
- Students
- students who started 9th grade together: 345
- Comparison
- California: graduates divided by students who started 9th grade together, across 2,281 public schools’ rows (our combination, not CDE’s published state rate; 432,702 of 487,177).
For grades 6–8, the standing among California middle schools is in Tests ↓
Overview
Is Reseda Charter a good high school?
Developing. Reseda Charter is lower than most California high schools on test results and attendance.
From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).
Test results, spring 2025
English, Proficient or Advanced2647%
Math, Proficient or Advanced4524%
English, Advanced3319%
Math, Advanced5511%
Showing up, 2024–25
Attendance2030 in 100
Reseda Charter’s place among California high schools, out of 100Los Angeles Unified’s other high schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest
One more thing to know
In grade 11, spring 2026, 19% scored Proficient or Advanced in math, against 32% across California.
Each bar is Reseda Charter’s place among 1,498 California public high schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.
How to read these bars, and their sources
A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2025, grade 11, the latest year with a high school Scope Score. That year the state called these levels Met or exceeded and Exceeded. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.
- Source for the sentence
- California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026. All students tested in grade 11. California: CDE’s grade 11 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 413,523 in math tested).
In its own words
What does Reseda Charter say about itself?
These lines come from the school’s own website. They are the school’s description. They are not parent reviews or test results.
“We are dedicated to EDUCATING, EMPOWERING, INSPIRING , both students and faculty, to EXCEL collectively fostering a community of continuous growth and achievement.”
What it puts first
Kid-led. The school's own words describe learning that starts from the child, such as exploring, projects, inquiry or hands-on work.
- “student-centered instruction focused on academic growth” its page (opens in a new tab)
More in its own words
“Our vision is to be a caring, inclusive community that fosters a sense of belonging and confronts social inequities such that all students can become critical thinkers, advocates, and leaders in academics, college, career, and life.”
How it teaches
Data-driven, student-centered instruction focused on academic growth, career exploration, and social-emotional development.
Programs
Science Magnet.
Languages
Dual Language pathways.
Every line here is from resedacharterhs.lausd.org, read October 28, 2026.
Nearby
How does it compare with schools nearby?
9 of the 10 high schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Reseda Charter. Each school is compared with every California high school.
Scope Score
11 high schools within 2.8 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.
- Sherman Oaks Center for Enriched StudiesMagnet · by applicationScope Score 8790th
- Valley International PreparatoryCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 8687th
- High Tech LACharter · its own lotteryScope Score 8483rd
- Taft CharterCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 8175th
- Birmingham Community CharterCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 8173rd
- Daniel Pearl Journalism & Communications MagnetMagnet · by applicationScope Score 7969th
- Grover Cleveland CharterCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 7967th
- Magnolia Science AcademyCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 7654th
- Magnolia Science Academy 2Charter · its own lotteryScope Score 7552nd
- Reseda CharterScope Score 7340th
- Virtual Academy of International Studies/Humanities (World Languages and Cultures)School of choice · by applicationScope Score 635th
Los Angeles UnifiedCharterMagnet or school of choice
A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats. A magnet or other school of choice takes applications through its district.
Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2025, grade 11. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map
Scores and family income
Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students met or exceeded the standard in English.
50%75%0%25%50%75%100%
4 of 11 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.
English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2025, grade 11. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.
Schools like it
How does Reseda Charter compare with schools like it?
Reseda Charter’s Scope Score is 73. 332 California high schools, counting Reseda Charter, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 72. Reseda Charter’s result is higher than 190 of them.
Typical · 72This school · 73
5060708090
The five schools with the highest results of the 332
Students from low-income families: 86%
Middle College High
Santa Ana
Scope Score 93Strong · 96th percentile
Students from low-income families: 89%
Middle College High
Los Angeles
Scope Score 92Strong · 96th percentile
Students from low-income families: 85%
Compton Early College High
Compton
Scope Score 91Strong · 95th percentile
Students from low-income families: 91%
Middle College High
San Bernardino
Scope Score 90Strong · 93rd percentile
Students from low-income families: 82%
San Jacinto Leadership Academy - Magnet
San Jacinto
Scope Score 88Strong · 91st percentile
332 California public high schools where 82% to 94% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2025.
How the group is chosen
The group is every California public high school we score where 82% to 94% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Reseda Charter’s share. The count includes Reseda Charter. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2025, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.
Over time
Have results changed?
English results were similar to 2025; math results were lower. English went from 47% to 49% and math from 24% to 19%.
Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026
Grade 11. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.
English
No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202660%54%60%Los Angeles UnifiedDistrict57%CaliforniaCalifornia49%Reseda CharterThis school
Math
No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202628%22%32%CaliforniaCalifornia31%Los Angeles UnifiedDistrict19%Reseda CharterThis school
The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Los Angeles Unified’s line combines its 189 high schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Each year’s results
The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Los Angeles Unified’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.
| Spring | Reseda Charter | Los Angeles Unified | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 54% | 60% | 60% | 340 |
| 2018 | 47% | 56% | 56% | 339 |
| 2019 | 44% | 57% | 57% | 287 |
| 2022 | 50% | 52% | 55% | 275 |
| 2023 | 43% | 55% | 55% | 257 |
| 2024 | 51% | 55% | 56% | 314 |
| 2025 | 47% | 58% | 57% | 205 |
| 2026 | 49% | 60% | 57% | 211 |
| Spring | Reseda Charter | Los Angeles Unified | California | Tested here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 22% | 28% | 32% | 342 |
| 2018 | 18% | 27% | 31% | 336 |
| 2019 | 30% | 29% | 32% | 288 |
| 2022 | 20% | 22% | 27% | 275 |
| 2023 | 14% | 23% | 27% | 261 |
| 2024 | 20% | 24% | 28% | 311 |
| 2025 | 24% | 29% | 30% | 206 |
| 2026 | 19% | 31% | 32% | 213 |
Tests
How did students here do on state tests?
Below California in English; well below it in math.
Math
19%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
562513Los Angeles Unified31%California32%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced
In grade 11, spring 2026, 49% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 19% in math, against 57% and 32% across California.
The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grade 11 combined. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
How does math compare with English?
In grade 11, spring 2026, math trails English by 30 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 25 points across California. The grade 11 cards above give each subject’s share.
How do the middle grades do?
Near California in English; below it in math. In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 45% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 32% in math, against 49% and 37% across California. The middle grades are placed separately: 64th percentile (Solid) among California’s middle schools.
English
45%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
33222916Los Angeles Unified47%California49%
Math
32%
scored Proficient or Advanced.
48201517Los Angeles Unified35%California37%
Results for each grade, spring 2026
What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 31% | 41% | 62% |
| Advanced | 13% | 12% | 24% |
| Proficient | 18% | 29% | 38% |
| Developing level | 27% | 19% | 20% |
| Minimal | 42% | 40% | 18% |
| Tested | 100 | 90 | 95 |
| California | 48% | 51% | 49% |
| Difference | −17 | −10 | +13 |
| Measure | Grade 11 |
|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 49% |
| Advanced | 18% |
| Proficient | 31% |
| Developing level | 24% |
| Minimal | 27% |
| Tested | 211 |
| California | 57% |
| Difference | −8 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 6 | Grade 7 | Grade 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 23% | 39% | 35% |
| Advanced | 15% | 16% | 21% |
| Proficient | 8% | 23% | 14% |
| Developing level | 20% | 22% | 19% |
| Minimal | 57% | 39% | 46% |
| Tested | 99 | 90 | 95 |
| California | 37% | 38% | 36% |
| Difference | −14 | +1 | −1 |
| Measure | Grade 11 |
|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 19% |
| Advanced | 6% |
| Proficient | 13% |
| Developing level | 25% |
| Minimal | 56% |
| Tested | 213 |
| California | 32% |
| Difference | −13 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
All four test levels, with the number of students tested
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grade 11 · This school | 18% | 31% | 24% | 27% | 211 |
| English, grade 11 · California | 27% | 30% | 21% | 22% | 414,559 |
| English, grade 11 · Los Angeles Unified | 26% | 33% | 21% | 20% | 34,143 |
| Math, grade 11 · This school | 6% | 13% | 25% | 56% | 213 |
| Math, grade 11 · California | 16% | 16% | 20% | 48% | 413,523 |
| Math, grade 11 · Los Angeles Unified | 14% | 17% | 22% | 47% | 34,113 |
| English, grades 6–8 · This school | 16% | 29% | 22% | 33% | 285 |
| English, grades 6–8 · California | 19% | 30% | 23% | 28% | 1,254,039 |
| English, grades 6–8 · Los Angeles Unified | 17% | 30% | 23% | 30% | 106,147 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · This school | 17% | 15% | 20% | 48% | 284 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · California | 21% | 16% | 23% | 40% | 1,254,800 |
| Math, grades 6–8 · Los Angeles Unified | 19% | 16% | 23% | 42% | 106,060 |
Spring 2026, grade 11 combined: 211 tested in English, 213 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Who goes here
Who goes here?
Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 71% of students. 431 of 1,374 students missed 10% or more of school days.
Missing school, 2025–26
282023–24302024–25312025–26
31in 100
students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (431 of 1,374 students).
At the average Los Angeles Unified high school: 28 in 100. At the average California high school: 22 in 100.
Suspensions: 1.4% of students were suspended at least once (20 of 1,418). Average California high school 2.9%.
Students, 2024–25
1,339
students in grades 6–12.
Hispanic or Latino 71%White 15%Asian 5%Black or African American 3%Filipino 2%Two or more races 2%Not reported 1%
Family income
88%
of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 1,182 of 1,339. California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
78
teachers, with 14 years of experience on average.
4% were in their first year.
80% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.
English learners
48%
of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (85 of 177 students).
Los Angeles Unified: 52%. California: 47%.
It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.
Missing school, by grade
- Grade 6
- 18 in 100 students in grade 6 were chronically absent (22 of 120).
- Grades 7–8
- 20 in 100 students in grades 7–8 were chronically absent (41 of 203).
- Grades 9–12
- 35 in 100 students in grades 9–12 were chronically absent (368 of 1,051).
Full student mix, 2025–26
| Students | Here |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 71% |
| White | 15% |
| Asian | 5% |
| Black or African American | 3% |
| Filipino | 2% |
| Two or more races | 2% |
| Not reported | 1% |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
Where these figures come from
Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.
Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 68.4 of 85.3 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.
Student groups
How do kids like mine do here?
Hispanic or Latino students scored below the same group across California in math.
This schoolThe same group, California
- Low-incomeEnglish · 191 tested50%California 49%
- Low-incomeMath · 193 tested17%California 23%
- Hispanic or LatinoEnglish · 156 tested47%California 49%
- Hispanic or LatinoMath · 156 tested13%California 21%
13% of Hispanic or Latino students scored Proficient or Advanced in math (grade 11, spring 2026), against 21% for the same group across California.
Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grade 11, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).
Every group’s results, with the district
Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.
Proficient or Advancedgrade 11 · spring 2026
| Group and subject | Here | vs Los Angeles Unified | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 191 tested in English, 193 in math | |||
| English | 50% | −454% | +149% |
| Math | 17% | −926% | −623% |
| Hispanic or Latino · 156 tested | |||
| English | 47% | −653% | −249% |
| Math | 13% | −1225% | −821% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.
White students, English learners and students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
After high school
How many students here graduate, and where do they go next?
92% of students graduated in four years in 2024–25. That compares with 89% across California. 56% were ready for college or career (state measure) in 2024–25. 42% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months.
ready for college or career (state measure), 2024–25
56%
Across California: 52%.
of graduates finished the UC/CSU course list, 2024–25
60%
At the average California high school: 56%.
Graduation, college and university records
Preparation · each measure describes a different student group
Graduated in four years
92%
Across California: 89%
Ready for college or career (state measure)
56%
Across California: 52%
Finished the UC/CSU course list
60%
Average California high school: 56%
Destinations · class of 2023
Where students who finished high school went
42% enrolled in college within 12 months · 271 students who finished high school
- University of California22 · 8%
- California State University CSU detail ↓39 · 15%
- California community college40 · 15%
- In-state private6 · 2%
- Out-of-state, 4-year6 · 2%
- Out-of-state, 2-year1 · <1%
- Not enrolled157 · 58%
Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: each count divided by all high-school completers (graduates and other students who finished), rounded together so they total 100. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.
Where the class of 2023 went
42%enrolled in college within a year
271 completers, class of 2023
- University of California22 (8%)
- California State University39 (15%)
- California community college40 (15%)
- In-state private6 (2%)
- Out-of-state, 4-year6 (2%)
- Out-of-state, 2-year1 (0%)
- Not enrolled157 (58%)
Source: CDE’s college-going rate for the class of 2023 (enrolled in college within 12 months). Shares are our arithmetic: count ÷ completers, rounded together so they total 100. A dash means we have no figure for that row; it isn’t zero.
Where these figures come fromEach measure’s source, student group and definition
- Graduated in four years
- 2024–25 · 319 of 345 students who started 9th grade together. California Department of Education, adjusted cohort graduation records. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates and cohort counts across the reference schools, not CDE’s published state rate.
- Ready for college or career (state measure)
- 2024–25 · 192 of 345 students in the state’s measure. California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator (CCI), overall “Prepared” rate, among the students in the indicator’s group. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate.
- Finished the UC/CSU course list
- 2024–25 · 190 of 319 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list. California Department of Education, A–G completion records (graduates who met the UC/CSU course requirements). Course completion is separate from college enrollment.
- Where students who finished high school went
- CDE college-going records, class of 2023. College enrollment is counted for 12 months after finishing high school and matched to college records, so this runs about two years behind. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
A closer look: CSU admission recordsApplied, admitted and enrolled, from each university system’s own records
CSU’s own records
California State University
- Applied
- 117
- Admitted
- 108
- Enrolled
- 46
By campus · falls 2021–2025 added together
- Cal State NorthridgeApplied 420 · Admitted 391 · Enrolled 181
- Cal State Long BeachApplied 146 · Admitted 55 · Enrolled under 6
- Cal State LAApplied 123 · Admitted 110 · Enrolled under 6
- San Diego StateApplied 98 · Admitted 19 · Enrolled under 6
- CSU Channel IslandsApplied 94 · Admitted 87 · Enrolled 7
- Cal Poly PomonaApplied 80 · Admitted 45 · Enrolled under 6
- Cal Poly San Luis ObispoApplied 72 · Admitted 27 · Enrolled 8
- Cal State FullertonApplied 58 · Admitted 38 · Enrolled under 6
- Cal State Dominguez HillsApplied 37 · Admitted 33 · Enrolled —
- San Francisco StateApplied 30 · Admitted 29 · Enrolled under 6
- CSU BakersfieldApplied 28 · Admitted 24 · Enrolled —
- Chico StateApplied 23 · Admitted 20 · Enrolled —
- Cal Poly HumboldtApplied 23 · Admitted 19 · Enrolled under 6
- Sacramento StateApplied 22 · Admitted 22 · Enrolled under 6
- Cal State San BernardinoApplied 19 · Admitted 18 · Enrolled under 6
- Fresno StateApplied 18 · Admitted 17 · Enrolled —
- San José StateApplied 17 · Admitted 13 · Enrolled under 6
- Cal State East BayApplied 12 · Admitted 10 · Enrolled —
- Cal State Monterey BayApplied 9 · Admitted 8 · Enrolled —
- Cal State San MarcosApplied 7 · Admitted 7 · Enrolled —
- Sonoma StateApplied 7 · Admitted 6 · Enrolled under 6
- Stanislaus StateApplied 7 · Admitted 7 · Enrolled —
- Cal Poly Maritime AcademyApplied under 6 · Admitted under 6 · Enrolled —
Each fall since 2021
- Fall 2025Applied 117 · Admitted 108 · Enrolled 46
- Fall 2024Applied 88 · Admitted 82 · Enrolled 38
- Fall 2023Applied 87 · Admitted 82 · Enrolled 38
- Fall 2022Applied 93 · Admitted 86 · Enrolled 41
- Fall 2021Applied 99 · Admitted 90 · Enrolled 54
Advanced courses on record
AP courses the school is approved to teach
The College Board approved this school to teach 17 AP courses in 5 subjects for 2025–26.
- Math & Computer Science4
- Sciences3
- English2
- History & Social Science6
- World Languages & Cultures2
Every approved AP course17 courses in 5 subjects
Math & Computer Science 4
- Calculus AB
- Calculus BC
- Computer Science A
- Computer Science Principles
Sciences 3
- Biology
- Chemistry
- Environmental Science
English 2
- English Language and Composition
- English Literature and Composition
History & Social Science 6
- African American Studies
- Macroeconomics
- Psychology
- U.S. Government and Politics
- United States History
- World History: Modern
World Languages & Cultures 2
- Spanish Language and Culture
- Spanish Literature and Culture
What other courses and pathways are on record?
- College courses in high school (dual enrollment)
- 115 students took one
What people say
What do students, families and staff say?
On safety, students, families and staff here all answered less positively than at Los Angeles Unified schools in 2025–26.
This schoolLos Angeles Unified schools at the same level, same questionsShare who gave one of the two most positive answers. Each line runs from 40% to 100%.
Students, middle grades
278 answered
Feeling safe
Belonging
Caring adults
Having a say
High expectations
- Higher than Los Angeles Unified
- LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer) students at this school are accepted63%district 53%
- There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering me61%district 57%
- There is at least one adult at my school who supports me72%district 69%
- Lower than Los Angeles Unified
- This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learn54%district 63%
- There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of class68%district 75%
- Happened to them 2 or more times in 30 days · lower is better
- Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?32%district 30%
- Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?30%district 25%
Students, high school grades
847 answered
Feeling safe
Belonging
Caring adults
Having a say
High expectations
- Higher than Los Angeles Unified
- I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activities58%district 53%
- Teachers at my school know me64%district 61%
- In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work better74%district 71%
- Lower than Los Angeles Unified
- Most kids at this school are kind to each other37%district 46%
- Students have a voice in decision making at this school44%district 53%
- Happened to them 2 or more times in 30 days · lower is better
- Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?17%district 15%
- Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?16%district 15%
Families, middle grades
Parents and guardians · 105 surveys came back
Child is safe
Feeling welcome
Caring adults
Being included
High expectations
Bullying handled
- Lower than Los Angeles Unified
- This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school59%district 81%
- I am greeted by school staff when I visit this school71%district 88%
Families, high school grades
Parents and guardians · 236 surveys came back
Child is safe
Feeling welcome
Caring adults
Being included
High expectations
Bullying handled
- Lower than Los Angeles Unified
- Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school62%district 78%
- My child is safe on school grounds66%district 81%
Staff, middle grades
Teachers and other staff · 160 answered, 85 of them teachers
Feeling safe
Caring adults
High expectations
Little bullying
- Lower than Los Angeles Unified
- At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests56%district 78%
- Harassment or bullying among students54%district 71%
Staff, high school grades
Teachers and other staff · 160 answered, 85 of them teachers
Feeling safe
Caring adults
High expectations
Little bullying
- Lower than Los Angeles Unified
- Harassment or bullying among students54%district 81%
- At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests56%district 77%
Each line is the average of the survey’s questions on that theme. The themes are our grouping. We show a question only when at least 20 people answered it. The lists name the questions 3 points or more from Los Angeles Unified schools at the same level. These answers are not part of the Scope Score. Source: Los Angeles Unified, School Experience Survey, 2025–26. Survey results (opens in a new tab)
All 45 student questions, middle grades
| Question | Here | Los Angeles Unified middle schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions | 59% | 64% | 277 |
| Belonging | |||
| This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learn | 54% | 63% | 270 |
| I am happy to be at this school | 63% | 64% | 278 |
| I feel like I am part of this school | 53% | 58% | 278 |
| I feel accepted for who I am at this school | 56% | 62% | 276 |
| Most kids at this school are kind to each other | 28% | 31% | 277 |
| LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer) students at this school are accepted | 63% | 53% | 177 |
| Caring adults | |||
| Teachers go out of their way to help students | 60% | 61% | 269 |
| The teachers at this school treat students fairly | 48% | 52% | 276 |
| Teachers care if I'm absent from school | 57% | 55% | 274 |
| Adults at this school treat all students with respect | 57% | 59% | 277 |
| There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering me | 61% | 57% | 266 |
| There is at least one adult at my school who supports me | 72% | 69% | 267 |
| Teachers at my school know me | 66% | 64% | 264 |
| If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help me | 63% | 68% | 275 |
| Engagement | |||
| Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activities | 70% | 75% | 269 |
| My teachers make learning fun | 40% | 44% | 265 |
| Students have a voice in decision making at this school | 46% | 48% | 269 |
| Teachers encourage students to make decisions | 60% | 61% | 268 |
| There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of class | 68% | 75% | 267 |
| I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activities | 38% | 44% | 268 |
| High expectations | |||
| In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work better | 73% | 75% | 271 |
| Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I choose | 70% | 70% | 269 |
| Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days | |||
| Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 30% | 25% | 275 |
| Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 32% | 30% | 271 |
| Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 18% | 17% | 272 |
| Been bullied online?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 12% | 10% | 268 |
| Had sexual jokes, comments, or gestures made to you?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 20% | 16% | 174 |
| Other questions | |||
| The teachers at this school grade me fairly | 46% | 61% | 270 |
| Students know how they are expected to act | 38% | 45% | 271 |
| Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rules | 70% | 76% | 271 |
| What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete? | — | — | 192 |
| I can change my intelligence with hard work | 72% | 72% | 271 |
| I can increase my intelligence by challenging myself | 70% | 71% | 271 |
| I am capable of learning anything | 64% | 68% | 267 |
| I feel safe in the neighborhood around this school | 46% | 62% | 276 |
| I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficult | 50% | 50% | 262 |
| I can master the hardest topics in my classes | 37% | 42% | 262 |
| I can meet all the learning goals my teachers set | 50% | 54% | 262 |
| I came to class prepared | 76% | 76% | 270 |
| I remembered and followed directions | 81% | 79% | 266 |
| I paid attention, even when there were distractions | 61% | 59% | 269 |
| How well did you get along with students who are different from you? | 68% | 67% | 272 |
| When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views? | 69% | 67% | 273 |
| How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view? | 79% | 75% | 273 |
A dash means fewer than 20 people answered, or the survey file we hold gives no share for the question.
All 46 student questions, high grades
| Question | Here | Los Angeles Unified high schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions | 60% | 65% | 847 |
| Belonging | |||
| This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learn | 64% | 65% | 819 |
| I am happy to be at this school | 59% | 64% | 842 |
| I feel like I am part of this school | 55% | 59% | 840 |
| I feel accepted for who I am at this school | 62% | 66% | 840 |
| Most kids at this school are kind to each other | 37% | 46% | 841 |
| LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer) students at this school are accepted | 60% | 63% | 844 |
| Caring adults | |||
| Teachers go out of their way to help students | 62% | 62% | 825 |
| The teachers at this school treat students fairly | 59% | 60% | 835 |
| Teachers care if I'm absent from school | 52% | 54% | 837 |
| Adults at this school treat all students with respect | 58% | 59% | 847 |
| There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering me | 58% | 59% | 824 |
| There is at least one adult at my school who supports me | 69% | 68% | 819 |
| Teachers at my school know me | 64% | 61% | 818 |
| If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help me | 65% | 66% | 839 |
| Engagement | |||
| Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activities | 74% | 73% | 825 |
| My teachers make learning fun | 45% | 48% | 819 |
| Students have a voice in decision making at this school | 44% | 53% | 831 |
| Teachers encourage students to make decisions | 60% | 64% | 829 |
| There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of class | 75% | 74% | 826 |
| I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activities | 58% | 53% | 830 |
| High expectations | |||
| In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work better | 74% | 71% | 828 |
| Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I choose | 68% | 70% | 827 |
| Adults at this school have helped me learn the details of getting into college (completing applications, financial aid, etc) | 57% | 63% | 824 |
| Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days | |||
| Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 16% | 15% | 839 |
| Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 17% | 15% | 836 |
| Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 7% | 6% | 840 |
| Been bullied online?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 5% | 6% | 837 |
| Had sexual jokes, comments, or gestures made to you?A lower share means fewer students reported it. | 12% | 10% | 833 |
| Other questions | |||
| The teachers at this school grade me fairly | 63% | 61% | 824 |
| Students know how they are expected to act | 49% | 54% | 836 |
| Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rules | 71% | 69% | 836 |
| What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete? | — | — | 670 |
| I can change my intelligence with hard work | 72% | 72% | 828 |
| I can increase my intelligence by challenging myself | 73% | 73% | 823 |
| I am capable of learning anything | 72% | 72% | 824 |
| I feel safe in the neighborhood around this school | 51% | 57% | 839 |
| I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficult | 52% | 48% | 820 |
| I can master the hardest topics in my classes | 47% | 44% | 817 |
| I can meet all the learning goals my teachers set | 54% | 54% | 819 |
| I came to class prepared | 79% | 76% | 831 |
| I remembered and followed directions | 82% | 81% | 828 |
| I paid attention, even when there were distractions | 64% | 67% | 828 |
| How well did you get along with students who are different from you? | 67% | 69% | 834 |
| When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views? | 76% | 74% | 833 |
| How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view? | 78% | 79% | 833 |
A dash means fewer than 20 people answered, or the survey file we hold gives no share for the question.
All 38 family questions, middle grades
| Question | Here | Los Angeles Unified middle schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| My child is safe on school grounds | 68% | 82% | 96 |
| Belonging | |||
| Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and online | 88% | 89% | 100 |
| Teachers treat me with respect in-person and online | 87% | 90% | 100 |
| I am greeted by school staff when I visit this school | 71% | 88% | 98 |
| I feel welcome to participate at this school | 75% | 88% | 104 |
| Caring adults | |||
| Teachers take my concerns seriously | 79% | 86% | 100 |
| Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progress | 80% | 88% | 100 |
| Engagement | |||
| This school informs me about school activities in different ways | 77% | 89% | 103 |
| This school includes me in important decisions about my child's education | 70% | 82% | 104 |
| This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school | 59% | 81% | 100 |
| High expectations | |||
| School staff expect my child to attend college | 66% | 82% | 83 |
| School staff expect my child to graduate from high school | 84% | 86% | 74 |
| Bullying reports taken seriously | |||
| Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school | 63% | 74% | 99 |
| Other questions | |||
| Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriously | 81% | 84% | 100 |
| Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely manner | 77% | 84% | 100 |
| Teachers respond to my needs in a timely manner | 82% | 85% | 100 |
| Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's school | 82% | 83% | 99 |
| I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learning | 72% | 85% | 99 |
| This school encourages my child to explore different career choices | 65% | 77% | 104 |
| School staff help me understand the requirements for CSU/UC admission | 55% | 69% | 74 |
| School staff help me understand which courses my child needs to graduate from high school | 64% | 75% | 70 |
| This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's education | 71% | 82% | 104 |
| This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growth | 75% | 84% | 103 |
| This school provides high quality instruction to my child | 71% | 87% | 103 |
| I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this school | 69% | 86% | 104 |
| I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performances | 81% | 86% | 99 |
| I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignments | 78% | 89% | 100 |
| I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resources | 84% | 87% | 99 |
| This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understand | 79% | 90% | 104 |
| School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need them | 79% | 82% | 76 |
| This school provides information on grade level requirements for my child | 76% | 86% | 96 |
| This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family center | 78% | 84% | 98 |
| I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this school | 76% | 83% | 100 |
| This school offers extra academic support for my child | 70% | 84% | 104 |
| I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available online | 64% | 77% | 83 |
| I have received information about my child's progress as an English Learner | 78% | 82% | 73 |
| My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rules | 87% | 91% | 99 |
| Discipline is fair at this school | 58% | 72% | 99 |
A dash means fewer than 20 people answered, or the survey file we hold gives no share for the question.
All 40 family questions, high grades
| Question | Here | Los Angeles Unified high schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| My child is safe on school grounds | 66% | 81% | 218 |
| Belonging | |||
| Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and online | 81% | 87% | 229 |
| Teachers treat me with respect in-person and online | 85% | 88% | 228 |
| I am greeted by school staff when I visit this school | 77% | 86% | 220 |
| I feel welcome to participate at this school | 83% | 87% | 236 |
| Caring adults | |||
| Teachers take my concerns seriously | 80% | 85% | 229 |
| Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progress | 82% | 86% | 230 |
| Engagement | |||
| This school informs me about school activities in different ways | 79% | 86% | 235 |
| This school includes me in important decisions about my child's education | 74% | 83% | 234 |
| This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school | 69% | 80% | 229 |
| High expectations | |||
| School staff expect my child to attend college | 80% | 87% | 219 |
| School staff expect my child to graduate from high school | 89% | 90% | 217 |
| Bullying reports taken seriously | |||
| Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school | 62% | 78% | 226 |
| Other questions | |||
| Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriously | 76% | 84% | 228 |
| Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely manner | 76% | 83% | 229 |
| Teachers respond to my needs in a timely manner | 79% | 84% | 229 |
| Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's school | 75% | 82% | 225 |
| I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learning | 76% | 85% | 224 |
| This school encourages my child to explore different career choices | 80% | 84% | 236 |
| School staff help me understand the requirements for CSU/UC admission | 78% | 81% | 209 |
| School staff help me understand which courses my child needs to graduate from high school | 80% | 86% | 218 |
| School staff help me understand how to apply for financial aid for college | 84% | 85% | 109 |
| School staff help me understand how to help my child apply for college | 84% | 85% | 109 |
| This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's education | 77% | 84% | 235 |
| This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growth | 82% | 86% | 236 |
| This school provides high quality instruction to my child | 79% | 86% | 236 |
| I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this school | 79% | 86% | 236 |
| I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performances | 74% | 80% | 225 |
| I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignments | 87% | 88% | 228 |
| I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resources | 78% | 84% | 225 |
| This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understand | 85% | 89% | 235 |
| School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need them | 82% | 83% | 193 |
| This school provides information on grade level requirements for my child | 81% | 87% | 221 |
| This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family center | 80% | 83% | 219 |
| I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this school | 75% | 82% | 229 |
| This school offers extra academic support for my child | 82% | 86% | 236 |
| I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available online | 66% | 78% | 206 |
| I have received information about my child's progress as an English Learner | 78% | 80% | 184 |
| My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rules | 88% | 89% | 226 |
| Discipline is fair at this school | 63% | 77% | 226 |
A dash means fewer than 20 people answered, or the survey file we hold gives no share for the question.
All 46 staff questions, middle grades
| Question | Here | Los Angeles Unified middle schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| I feel safe on school grounds during the day | 81% | 94% | 153 |
| Caring adults | |||
| At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests | 56% | 78% | 160 |
| Adults at this school treat all students with respect | 84% | 90% | 152 |
| High expectations | |||
| This school sets high standards for academic performance for all students | 84% | 91% | 153 |
| This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to students | 89% | 92% | 153 |
| Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem | |||
| Harassment or bullying among students | 54% | 71% | 155 |
| Other questions | |||
| I have the materials I need to do my job well | 73% | 77% | 158 |
| Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time period | 82% | 81% | 157 |
| I get the help I need to communicate with parents | 68% | 77% | 157 |
| The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my school | 88% | 93% | 157 |
| I feel safe in the neighborhood around my school | 74% | 86% | 154 |
| At this school, parents treat me with respect. | 72% | 81% | 158 |
| This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to work | 66% | 78% | 157 |
| This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policies | 57% | 72% | 158 |
| How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect? | 85% | 86% | 156 |
| How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school? | 69% | 75% | 156 |
| Students treat adults at this school with respect | 57% | 70% | 155 |
| This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rules | 60% | 74% | 149 |
| This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problems | 53% | 67% | 147 |
| Racial/ethnic conflict among students | 73% | 81% | 154 |
| The curriculum at this school is focused on helping students get ready for college (teachers) | 71% | 79% | 77 |
| Teachers expect most students in this school to go to college (teachers) | 68% | 80% | 76 |
| Teachers in this school feel that it is a part of their job to prepare students academically to succeed in college (teachers) | 90% | 86% | 77 |
| The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers) | 57% | 68% | 37 |
| During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers) | — | — | 64 |
| I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers) | 54% | 54% | 61 |
| I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers) | 57% | 64% | 61 |
| I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers) | 57% | 70% | 61 |
| I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers) | 79% | 78% | 61 |
| Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers) | 10% | 17% | 82 |
| With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers) | 18% | 35% | 82 |
| Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers) | 21% | 42% | 81 |
| Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers) | 15% | 33% | 79 |
| Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers) | 32% | 45% | 78 |
| I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers) | 79% | 77% | 82 |
| I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers) | 83% | 76% | 82 |
| I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers) | 98% | 92% | 82 |
| I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers) | 96% | 90% | 82 |
| What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers) | 52% | 65% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers) | 52% | 63% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers) | 48% | 60% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers) | 51% | 64% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers) | 67% | 69% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers) | 71% | 73% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers) | 57% | 66% | 82 |
| I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers) | 79% | 85% | 82 |
A dash means fewer than 20 people answered, or the survey file we hold gives no share for the question.
All 46 staff questions, high grades
| Question | Here | Los Angeles Unified high schools | Answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | |||
| I feel safe on school grounds during the day | 81% | 93% | 153 |
| Caring adults | |||
| At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests | 56% | 77% | 160 |
| Adults at this school treat all students with respect | 84% | 88% | 152 |
| High expectations | |||
| This school sets high standards for academic performance for all students | 84% | 88% | 153 |
| This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to students | 89% | 92% | 153 |
| Bullying called a mild or insignificant problem | |||
| Harassment or bullying among students | 54% | 81% | 155 |
| Other questions | |||
| I have the materials I need to do my job well | 73% | 78% | 158 |
| Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time period | 82% | 82% | 157 |
| I get the help I need to communicate with parents | 68% | 77% | 157 |
| The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my school | 88% | 92% | 157 |
| I feel safe in the neighborhood around my school | 74% | 84% | 154 |
| At this school, parents treat me with respect. | 72% | 84% | 158 |
| This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to work | 66% | 77% | 157 |
| This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policies | 57% | 71% | 158 |
| How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect? | 85% | 84% | 156 |
| How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school? | 69% | 73% | 156 |
| Students treat adults at this school with respect | 57% | 78% | 155 |
| This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rules | 60% | 71% | 149 |
| This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problems | 53% | 66% | 147 |
| Racial/ethnic conflict among students | 73% | 87% | 154 |
| The curriculum at this school is focused on helping students get ready for college (teachers) | 71% | 81% | 77 |
| Teachers expect most students in this school to go to college (teachers) | 68% | 81% | 76 |
| Teachers in this school feel that it is a part of their job to prepare students academically to succeed in college (teachers) | 90% | 87% | 77 |
| The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers) | 57% | 68% | 37 |
| During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers) | — | — | 64 |
| I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers) | 54% | 50% | 61 |
| I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers) | 57% | 60% | 61 |
| I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers) | 57% | 65% | 61 |
| I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers) | 79% | 76% | 61 |
| Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers) | 10% | 17% | 82 |
| With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers) | 18% | 28% | 82 |
| Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers) | 21% | 35% | 81 |
| Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers) | 15% | 27% | 79 |
| Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers) | 32% | 40% | 78 |
| I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers) | 79% | 76% | 82 |
| I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers) | 83% | 76% | 82 |
| I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers) | 98% | 92% | 82 |
| I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers) | 96% | 91% | 82 |
| What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers) | 52% | 61% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers) | 52% | 60% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers) | 48% | 57% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers) | 51% | 60% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers) | 67% | 67% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers) | 71% | 68% | 82 |
| The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers) | 57% | 62% | 82 |
| I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers) | 79% | 86% | 82 |
A dash means fewer than 20 people answered, or the survey file we hold gives no share for the question.
About the survey and these figuresWho answers, what we show, and how a theme figure is made
Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades.
Los Angeles Unified publishes no minimum number of answers. We show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group only when at least 10% of it responded, so the answers speak for more than the few who chose to reply.
Each row shows the percentage its label describes. For a theme, such as one marked “average of 5 questions”, we average the percentages for its questions, the way Los Angeles Unified averages its own topics. Each lane lists every question with its own percentage.
Family and staff answers
What would families and staff tell you?
Families and staff can answer a short set of questions about Reseda Charter. These are not star ratings or reviews.
- Staff answers show once 5 people have answered.Until then this page shows no staff answers.
- Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
- The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
- Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.
- Staff confirm a work email.Staff answers come only from people who confirmed an email address at Los Angeles Unified.
Families
No family answers yet
0 of 20 needed before answers show
- Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
- When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
- Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
- And 4 more questions.
Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work
Staff
No staff answers yet
5 answers needed before they show
- Would you send your own child to this school?Yes · Maybe · No
- Do you plan to work at this school next year?Yes · Not sure · No
- Do you have the materials and supplies you need to teach?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
- And 5 more questions.
Money
How much is spent on each student here?
$27,242 for each student in 2024–25. California’s high schools spent $20,309 for each student.
$27,242
for each student at this school, 2024–25- Spent at the school
- $22,235
- The school’s share of district office costs
- $5,007
- Of the total, from federal funds
- $2,884
- Reseda Charter$27,242
- Los Angeles Unified high schools$23,805
- California high schools$20,309
The district and California figures combine their high schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,655 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓
The neighborhood
What is the area around Reseda Charter like?
These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 91335. They are not figures for the families at Reseda Charter.
Typical household income in a year
$80,143
Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 91335.
- Typical home value
- $751,700
- People who live in this ZIP code
- 74,526
- Typical age
- 39.2 years
- Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
- 30%
What you can do
Who can act on Reseda Charter’s results?
Reseda Charter’s own board decides its plan.
Where is its yearly plan?
Reseda Charter is an affiliated charter school. Los Angeles Unified runs the school. The school writes its own yearly plan (LCAP). Los Angeles Unified authorized this charter; its current term ends June 30, 2031.
Authorizer from the California Department of Education’s charter term file; term from its Charter School Database, checked October 22, 2026. Source
State support
The state hasn’t placed Reseda Charter in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source
Questions to ask
What should I ask, and when?
Bring these 13 questions to Reseda Charter. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.
On a tour
- When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?31 in 100 chronically absent, 2025–26 (431 of 1,374 students); average Los Angeles Unified high school: 28 in 100
- What extra help do Hispanic students get, and how do you know it’s working?20% of Hispanic students scored Proficient or Advanced in math, grades 6–8 and 11, spring 2026 (355 students tested); the same group across California: 24%
- When a bullying report comes in, who handles it, and how is the family told?22% (the average share reporting being bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 days, across 5 survey questions), 2025–26; LAUSD middle schools: 19%
- What is the school doing about this survey result?59% of families agreed that “This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school” (100 answered); LAUSD middle: 81%
- Which courses and career pathways does the school run, and who can enroll?
- How do counselors help students plan for college, training or work?
- How does the approach it describes show up in an ordinary lesson?From its own words, on how it teaches.
- Which grades take part in “Science Magnet”, and how often?From its own words, on programs.
- Which grades get a second language, and for how much of the day?From its own words, on languages.
Before you apply
- Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
- What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?
At the office
- What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
- What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?
Getting in
Which schools feed into Reseda Charter, and how do I get in?
Families inside Reseda Charter’s boundary enroll directly; others apply through LAUSD Choices. From parts of Gaspar De Portola Charter Middle, William Mulholland Middle, John A. Sutter Middle and Northridge Middle.
Boundaries split some neighborhoods. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.
Middle · part of its area
Gaspar De Portola Charter Middle Scope Score 85Strong · 88th percentile · 2026
Split: some of its area goes to another high school
Fed by 6 elementary schools
Middle · part of its area
William Mulholland Middle Scope Score 77Solid · 63rd percentile · 2026
Split: some of its area goes to another high school
Fed by 6 elementary schools
Middle · part of its area
John A. Sutter Middle Scope Score 71Developing · 26th percentile · 2026
Split: some of its area goes to another high school
Fed by 4 elementary schools
Middle · part of its area
Northridge Middle Scope Score 74Developing · 44th percentile · 2026
Split: some of its area goes to another high school
Fed by 3 elementary schools
Grades 6–12 · this school
Reseda Charter High
For middle school, the district assigns part of this area to Gaspar De Portola Charter Middle. Scope Score 85 · Strong · 88th percentile · 2026.
For middle school, the district assigns part of this area to William Mulholland Middle. Scope Score 77 · Solid · 63rd percentile · 2026.
For middle school, the district assigns part of this area to John A. Sutter Middle. Scope Score 71 · Developing · 26th percentile · 2026.
For middle school, the district assigns part of this area to Northridge Middle. Scope Score 74 · Developing · 44th percentile · 2026.
From the district’s 2026 attendance boundaries. Shares are our estimate of where the zone’s children live. We use 2020 Census child counts, or land area where few children were counted. A share counts children living in the zone, not a school’s enrolled students. A boundary doesn’t guarantee a place. Transfers, permits, magnets and Choices can change the path. Check your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Find a charter school in Los Angeles County · Explore schools on the map
Not a next step: the school sharing this address. Zane Grey Continuation (14th percentile, Needs Support, within continuation schools, 2025) has the same street address in the state’s school directory.
All feeding elementary schools (14)Grouped by the middle school each one feeds, with each school’s standing
Into Gaspar De Portola Charter Middle
- Emelita Street ElementarySome of its area goes to William Mulholland MiddleScope Score 74Developing · 45th percentile · 2026
- Vanalden Avenue ElementaryScope Score 77Solid · 59th percentile · 2026
- Nestle Avenue CharterSome of its area goes to another high schoolScope Score 80Solid · 72nd percentile · 2026
- Tarzana ElementarySome of its area goes to another high schoolScope Score 71Developing · 25th percentile · 2026
- Encino Charter ElementarySome of its area goes to William Mulholland MiddleScope Score 88Strong · 92nd percentile · 2026
- Calvert Charter for Enriched StudiesSome of its area goes to another high schoolScope Score 70Needs Support · 22nd percentile · 2026
Into William Mulholland Middle
- Bertrand Avenue ElementaryScope Score 70Needs Support · 20th percentile · 2026
- Emelita Street ElementarySome of its area goes to Gaspar De Portola Charter MiddleScope Score 74Developing · 45th percentile · 2026
- Newcastle ElementaryScope Score 80Solid · 72nd percentile · 2026
- Reseda ElementarySome of its area goes to John A. Sutter Middle and Northridge MiddleScope Score 77Solid · 60th percentile · 2026
- Anatola Avenue ElementarySome of its area goes to Northridge MiddleScope Score 73Developing · 35th percentile · 2026
- Encino Charter ElementarySome of its area goes to Gaspar De Portola Charter MiddleScope Score 88Strong · 92nd percentile · 2026
Into John A. Sutter Middle
- Shirley Avenue ElementaryScope Score 82Strong · 78th percentile · 2026
- Reseda ElementarySome of its area goes to William Mulholland Middle and Northridge MiddleScope Score 77Solid · 60th percentile · 2026
- Melvin Avenue ElementarySome of its area goes to another high schoolScope Score 78Solid · 62nd percentile · 2026
- Stanley Mosk ElementarySome of its area goes to another high schoolScope Score 80Solid · 73rd percentile · 2026
Into Northridge Middle
- Reseda ElementarySome of its area goes to William Mulholland Middle and John A. Sutter MiddleScope Score 77Solid · 60th percentile · 2026
- Garden Grove ElementarySome of its area goes to another high schoolScope Score 76Solid · 52nd percentile · 2026
- Anatola Avenue ElementarySome of its area goes to William Mulholland MiddleScope Score 73Developing · 35th percentile · 2026
All recorded links and nearby alternatives
Elementary links
- Bertrand Avenue Elementary
Assigned
Scope Score 70 · Needs Support · 20th percentile · elementary · 2026
- Emelita Street Elementary
Assigned
Scope Score 74 · Developing · 45th percentile · elementary · 2026
- Newcastle Elementary
Assigned
Scope Score 80 · Solid · 72nd percentile · elementary · 2026
- Shirley Avenue Elementary
Assigned
Scope Score 82 · Strong · 78th percentile · elementary · 2026
- Vanalden Avenue Elementary
Assigned
Scope Score 77 · Solid · 59th percentile · elementary · 2026
- Nestle Avenue Charter
Assigned for part of the zone · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
Scope Score 80 · Solid · 72nd percentile · elementary · 2026
98% of the zone’s children
- Tarzana Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 71 · Developing · 25th percentile · elementary · 2026
93% of the zone’s children
- Reseda Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 77 · Solid · 60th percentile · elementary · 2026
78% of the zone’s children
- Garden Grove Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 76 · Solid · 52nd percentile · elementary · 2026
54% of the zone’s children
- Anatola Avenue Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 73 · Developing · 35th percentile · elementary · 2026
31% of the zone’s children
- Encino Charter Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
Scope Score 88 · Strong · 92nd percentile · elementary · 2026
22% of the zone’s children
- Melvin Avenue Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 78 · Solid · 62nd percentile · elementary · 2026
22% of the zone’s children
- Stanley Mosk Elementary
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 80 · Solid · 73rd percentile · elementary · 2026
20% of the zone’s children
- Calvert Charter for Enriched Studies
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 70 · Needs Support · 22nd percentile · elementary · 2026
13% of the zone’s children
Middle-school links
- Gaspar De Portola Charter Middle
Assigned for part of the zone · Charter school. Check how it admits students.
Scope Score 85 · Strong · 88th percentile · middle · 2026
59% of the zone’s children
- William Mulholland Middle
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 77 · Solid · 63rd percentile · middle · 2026
35% of the zone’s children
- John A. Sutter Middle
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 71 · Developing · 26th percentile · middle · 2026
27% of the zone’s children
- Northridge Middle
Assigned for part of the zone
Scope Score 74 · Developing · 44th percentile · middle · 2026
15% of the zone’s children
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.
Applying to Reseda Charter for 2027–28
Reseda Charter is an LAUSD affiliated charter. Check your address first. Families inside its attendance boundary don’t apply. They enroll directly with the school.
On-time Choices applications closed November 6, 2026. Late applications open December 1, 2026 and join the end of the waitlist.
Choices letters go out February 8–12, 2027. Accept or decline by March 5, 2027: no answer counts as a decline.
Where it is
Where is Reseda Charter?
- Address
- 18230 Kittridge Street, Reseda 91335Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
- Office
- (818) 758-3600
- Website
- resedahs.net
- Administrator
- Pia Maria DamonteAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated October 21, 2024.
A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map
Short answers to 10 common questions
How do I get in?
Reseda Charter is an LAUSD affiliated charter. Check your address first. Families inside its attendance boundary don’t apply. They enroll directly with the school. See the details ↓
Is Reseda Charter a good school?
Reseda Charter High has a Scope Score of 73. It scored higher than 40 in 100 of California’s 1,498 scored public high schools (Developing, 40th percentile, spring 2025).
- Grades 6–8: higher than 64 in 100 California middle schools we score (64th percentile, Solid, spring 2026)
How often do students miss school or get suspended?
In 2025–26, 31 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 28 in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified high school. 1.4% of students (20 of 1,418) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 2.9% at the average California high school. See the details ↓
How does math compare with English?
In grade 11, spring 2026, math trails English by 30 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 25 points across California. See the details ↓
How do kids like mine do here?
In spring 2026, 45% of low-income students in grades 6, 7, 8 and 11 at Reseda Charter High scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 41% for the same group across California. See the details ↓
What do families and students say?
68% of families agreed or strongly agreed with “My child is safe on school grounds” (LAUSD middle schools 82%, 96 answered).
- 59% of students agreed or strongly agreed with “I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions” (LAUSD middle schools 64%, 277 answered)
- Source: Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey, 2025–26
What could my child study here?
The College Board approved this school to teach 17 AP courses in 5 subjects for 2025–26.
- 115 students took a college course for credit in 2023–24, by the federal Civil Rights Data Collection
Where do students go after finishing high school here?
42% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months, by CDE’s college-going records. See the details ↓
What does its own plan pay for?
In its 2026–27 plan, $31.7 million is planned for 14 funded actions in 4 goals, from the charter school’s discretionary funds as the plan lists them. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.
What should I ask on a visit?
The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓
Its own plan
What does Reseda Charter’s own plan commit to?
$31.7 million is planned for 14 funded actions in 4 goals, from the charter school’s discretionary funds as the plan lists them. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.
$31.7million
planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27The three largest actions in the plan
- Special Education Supports (paid by the district)$9.8 million
- General Fund School Program (paid by the district)$7.1 million
- LAUSD Support for Affiliated Charter Operations (paid by the district)$5.8 million
Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 93 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for
The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.
The 2026–27 plan in short
Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 93 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Where the money goes
The district pays for most of it. Its largest actions are Special Education Supports, General Fund School Program and LAUSD Support for Affiliated Charter Operations.
Reading, math and catch-up help
No action title in this plan names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners.
For high-need students
It plans $7.0 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $3.7 million and estimates it spent $3.5 million, $0.2 million (7%) less than planned (our arithmetic).
Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $0.2 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?
What changed
The total is $56,861 lower than in the 2025–26 plan. We couldn’t match $31.0 million of this $31.7 million plan to individual actions in last year’s plan. These lists cover the rest.
Largest cuts
- SENI Investments towards Engagement and Collaboration−$141,331
Ask: What did SENI Investments towards Engagement and Collaboration pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $141,331 less?
What its goals measure
Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grade 11 only: 49% in English and 19% in math, spring 2026.
| Measure | 2024–25 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Academic Excellence | 42% | 47% | up 5 pts |
| Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Academic Excellence | 24% | 26% | up 2 pts |
Goals 2, 3 and 4 aren’t shown because they track other measures.
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
The full plan4 goals, 25 measures and where the money goes
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($31.7 million).
Where does the money go?
79% to Goal 1, Academic Excellence. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.
G1
G2
G4
Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title
- fell 25% or more
- fell 10–25%
- fell 2–10%
- within 2%
- grew 2–10%
- grew 10–25%
- grew 25% or more
- new or renamed title
- not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
Every goal, in the plan’s order
Goal 1Academic Excellence$24.9 million79% of action budgets
8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $23.1 million (+$1.7 million) · p. 11 ↗
Largest funded actions
- Special Education Supports$9.8 millionaction 1.5 · paid by the district · p. 27 ↗
- General Fund School Program$7.1 millionaction 1.3 · paid by the district · p. 27 ↗
- Magnet Program$0.2 millionaction 1.4 · paid by the district · p. 27 ↗
- Career Technical Education$0.2 millionaction 1.1 · paid by the district · p. 27 ↗
- Transition Services$0.2 millionaction 1.2 · paid by the district · p. 27 ↗
3 more actions are in the plan, counted in the goal’s total: p. 27 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
- Special Education Supports (paid by the district) · $9.8 million · p. 27 ↗not compared
- General Fund School Program (paid by the district) · $7.1 million · p. 27 ↗not compared
- Title not confirmed (paid by the district) · $4.5 million · p. 27 ↗not compared
- Title not confirmed · $1.7 million · p. 58 ↗not compared
- Title not confirmed · $1.2 million · p. 58 ↗not compared
- Magnet Program (paid by the district) · $193,451 · p. 27 ↗not compared
- Career Technical Education (paid by the district) · $181,946 · p. 27 ↗not compared
- Transition Services (paid by the district) · $158,192 · p. 27 ↗not compared
How the plan measures it · 18 measures · 3 quoted
- Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate p. 12 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 All Students: 88.7% …
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 All Students: 93.9% …
- Five-Year Cohort Graduation Rate p. 12 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 All Students: 91.1% …
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 All Students: 93% …
- A-G Completion Rate (Meeting UC-CSU Entrance Requirements) p. 13 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 All Students: 53.3% …
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 All Students: 60.0% …
15 more measures in the plan’s table.
Goal 2Joy and Wellness$796,2203% of action budgets
4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.1 million (−$308,096) · p. 29 ↗
Largest funded actions
- SENI Investments towards Joy and Wellness$425,904action 2.4 · p. 58 ↗
- Base-Funded School Climate Support Staff$145,072action 2.2 · paid by the district · p. 38 ↗
- Supplemental School Climate Support Staff$48,362action 2.3 · paid by the district · p. 38 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
1 more action is in the plan, counted in the goal’s total: p. 38 ↗
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
- SENI Investments towards Joy and Wellness+$18,156$407,748 → $425,904 · p. 58 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
We couldn’t read this goal’s measures from the plan. They start near page 29. p. 29 ↗
Goal 3Engagement and Collaboration$214,4101% of action budgets
1 funded action · 2025–26 plan: $355,741 (−$141,331) · p. 39 ↗
Largest funded actions
- SENI Investments towards Engagement and Collaboration$214,410action 3.1 · p. 58 ↗
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
- SENI Investments towards Engagement and Collaboration−$141,331$355,741 → $214,410 · p. 58 ↗
How the plan measures it · 4 measures · 2 quoted
- Percent of Parents Reporting on the School Experience Survey: "This school includes me in important decisions about my child's education." p. 40 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 All Parents: 80.0% …
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 All Parents: 100.0%
- Percent of Parents Reporting on the School Experience Survey: "This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understand." p. 41 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 All Parents: 91.6% …
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 All Parents: 100.0%
2 more measures in the plan’s table.
Goal 4Operational Effectiveness and Investing in Staff$5.8 million18% of action budgets
1 funded action · 2025–26 plan: $7.1 million (−$1.3 million) · p. 45 ↗
Largest funded actions
- LAUSD Support for Affiliated Charter Operations$5.8 millionaction 4.1 · paid by the district · p. 47 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
- LAUSD Support for Affiliated Charter Operations (paid by the district) · $5.8 million · p. 47 ↗not compared
How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 3 quoted
- Percent of Facilities in Good Repair p. 46 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 100.0%
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 100.0%
- Percent of Teachers Are Appropriately Credentialed for the Students They Are Assigned to Teach p. 46 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 100.0%
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 100.0%
- Percent of Schools Providing Students with Standards-Based Instructional Materials by Meeting Williams Act Requirements p. 46 ↗
- Baseline
- 2022-2023 100.0%
- Target for year 3
- 2025-2026 100.0%
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
The full record
Source records
This page is built from 16 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.
Data updated
October 15, 2026
- Record sets on this page
- 16
- Sources
- California Department of EducationU.S. Census BureauCollege BoardU.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil RightsNational Student Clearinghouse
- State test years
- 2017–2026
Results
Students
After high school
Money and staff
Place, downloads and method
Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2024–25 · ranked #892 of 1,498 California high schools we score · #129 of 191 in Los Angeles Unified
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 92% | 56 | 25% |
| Exceeded standardaverage of English and math | 15% | 48 | 22% |
| Ready for college or career (state measure) | 56% | 57 | 20% |
| Met or exceededaverage of English and math | 35% | 49 | 18% |
| Chronically absent | 30 in 100 | 50 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.6% (24 of 1,469) | 59 | 5% |
| English learners: top level | 21% | — | 5% |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California high schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2024–25. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests.
Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2024–25 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify
The 2024–25 Scope Score, in the current-formula row below, uses the state’s college-or-career readiness measure, 2024–25. No verified earlier Scope Scores are available here.
Scope Score
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 73 | 40 | #892 | California high schools · 1,498 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23 and 2023–24 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension |
|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | 24 in 100 | 0.7% (10 of 1,493) |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file |
| 2023–24 | 28 in 100 | 1.3% (20 of 1,511) |
| 2024–25 | 30 in 100 | 1.6% (24 of 1,469) |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 496 | 17% | 47% |
| 2026 · Math | 497 | 12% | 26% |
| 2025 · English | 426 | 15% | 42% |
| 2025 · Math | 430 | 11% | 24% |
| 2024 · English | 493 | 19% | 47% |
| 2024 · Math | 494 | 10% | 25% |
| 2023 · English | 417 | 12% | 43% |
| 2023 · Math | 421 | 7% | 21% |
| 2022 · English | 378 | 19% | 52% |
| 2022 · Math | 378 | 7% | 21% |
| 2019 · English | 287 | 20% | 44% |
| 2019 · Math | 288 | 9% | 30% |
| 2018 · English | 339 | 18% | 47% |
| 2018 · Math | 336 | 6% | 18% |
| 2017 · English | 340 | 21% | 54% |
| 2017 · Math | 342 | 8% | 22% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 6 · English | 82 | 38% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · English | 82 | 41% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · English | 57 | 33% |
| 2025 · Grade 11 · English | 205 | 47% |
| 2025 · Grade 6 · Math | 84 | 25% |
| 2025 · Grade 7 · Math | 83 | 25% |
| 2025 · Grade 8 · Math | 57 | 25% |
| 2025 · Grade 11 · Math | 206 | 24% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · English | 75 | 29% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · English | 52 | 42% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · English | 52 | 60% |
| 2024 · Grade 11 · English | 314 | 51% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 79 | 24% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 52 | 27% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 52 | 54% |
| 2024 · Grade 11 · Math | 311 | 20% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · English | 52 | 31% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · English | 53 | 49% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · English | 55 | 53% |
| 2023 · Grade 11 · English | 257 | 43% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 52 | 25% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 53 | 40% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 55 | 35% |
| 2023 · Grade 11 · Math | 261 | 14% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · English | 53 | 53% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · English | 50 | 60% |
| 2022 · Grade 11 · English | 275 | 50% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 53 | 26% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 50 | 26% |
| 2022 · Grade 11 · Math | 275 | 20% |
| 2019 · Grade 11 · English | 287 | 44% |
| 2019 · Grade 11 · Math | 288 | 30% |
| 2018 · Grade 11 · English | 339 | 47% |
| 2018 · Grade 11 · Math | 336 | 18% |
| 2017 · Grade 11 · English | 340 | 54% |
| 2017 · Grade 11 · Math | 342 | 22% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 326 | 7% | 21% | 63% | 9% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 450 | 45% | 0 | +4 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 357 | 45% | 0 | +3 |
| White | 77 | 46% | −23 | −17 |
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | −14 | 198 | Moderate | −11 | 198 | Moderate |
| Low-income | −14 | 167 | Moderate | −11 | 167 | Moderate |
| Hispanic or Latino | −16 | 143 | Moderate | −17 | 143 | Moderate |
| English-only students | −11 | 88 | not categorized | −8 | 89 | not categorized |
| English learners | −11 | 64 | Moderate | −1 | 63 | Average |
| Recently reclassified as fluent in English | −6 | 49 | not categorized | −1 | 49 | not categorized |
| White | −4 | 31 | Average | +7 | 31 | Accelerated |
| Students with disabilities | −25 | 19 | Minimal | −33 | 19 | Minimal |
| English learners only | −33 | 15 | not categorized | 0 | 14 | not categorized |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure
California growth model · points vs expected
State model · English−14 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 6–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 6–8
198 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
State model · math−11 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 6–8CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
All students, grades 6–8
198 students
CDE growth category: Moderate
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.
Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26
CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 30 in 100 → 2025–26 · 31 in 100 · +1 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 1.6% (24 of 1,469) → 2025–26 · 1.4% (20 of 1,418) · −0.2 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 27 in 100 | 33 in 100 | +6 in 100 |
| Male | 22 in 100 | 30 in 100 | +8 in 100 |
| Asian | 15 of 84 | 13 of 62 | — |
| Black or African American | 25 of 79 | 18 of 48 | — |
| Filipino | 2 of 33 | 3 of 23 | — |
| Hispanic or Latino | 24 in 100 | 32 in 100 | +8 in 100 |
| Two or more races | 4 of 12 | 5 of 23 | — |
| White | 26 in 100 | 33 in 100 | +7 in 100 |
| Students with disabilities | 34 in 100 | 42 in 100 | +8 in 100 |
| English learners | 32 in 100 | 43 in 100 | +11 in 100 |
| Foster youth | 6 of 14 | — | — |
| Homeless | 11 of 35 | 22 of 43 | — |
| Low-income | 25 in 100 | 32 in 100 | +7 in 100 |
| All students | 24 in 100 | 31 in 100 | +7 in 100 |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
Graduation and readinessstate records · each rate for its own year and class of students
| Measure | Source record |
|---|---|
| This school · CCI overall Prepared | CDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · all students in the current four-year graduation cohort, plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Overall CCI Prepared rate 56% · numerator 192 students classified Prepared · denominator 345 CCI students. |
| California · CCI overall Prepared | CDE statewide CCI cohort · CCI source year 2025 · all students · overall Prepared rate 52% · numerator 257,567 students classified Prepared · denominator 497,814 CCI students. |
AP pathway among CCI Prepared studentsCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · AP pathway rate 51% · AP-pathway numerator 98 · denominator 192 (CCI Prepared students). This measure uses Prepared students as its denominator, not the whole CCI cohort; it is not an AP exam-taking rate or a count of AP courses offered. That cohort includes all students in the current four-year graduation cohort plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. In 2025 the pathway accepts two qualifying AP exams, two qualifying AP courses, or a combination of one of each in different subjects.
CDE's overall Prepared rate is the college-readiness factor in the Scope Score (20% of the high school score). The school rate is 192 of 345 CCI students, not the AP-only pathway or A–G completion rate. The California figure is CDE's statewide CCI student cohort, not an average of SchoolScope's comparable high schools or the SchoolScope school-rank pool.
Graduation rate
92%
AP route, among those ready for college or career
51%
2025 CDE CCI cohort · AP courses, exams, or both; share of students ready for college or career (CDE’s “Prepared”), not course offerings
Finished the UC/CSU course list (A–G)
60%
A–G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-going rate
42%
These source periods and populations differ: graduation uses an adjusted cohort, while A–G completion and college-going use separately reported groups. The rates are shown individually, without a shared performance tier.
AP course catalog2025–26 · College Board course authorizations
| Subject | Authorization recorded for |
|---|---|
| African American Studies | this school |
| Biology | this school |
| Calculus AB | this school |
| Calculus BC | this school |
| Chemistry | this school |
| Computer Science A | this school |
| Computer Science Principles | this school |
| English Language and Composition | this school |
| English Literature and Composition | this school |
| Environmental Science | this school |
| Macroeconomics | this school |
| Psychology | this school |
| Spanish Language and Culture | this school |
| Spanish Literature and Culture | this school |
| U.S. Government and Politics | this school |
| United States History | this school |
| World History: Modern | this school |
Authorization ≠ a section running this year — the Ledger records what the school may teach, not seat counts.
Advanced coursework, federal snapshot2023–24 · Civil Rights Data Collection · dated historical snapshot
| Measure | This school |
|---|---|
| AP offered | offered |
| AP course count | 19 |
| AP enrollment (male/female) | 299 |
| IB participation | not reported |
| Dual enrollment | offered · 115 enrolled |
| Algebra I in grade 8 | offered |
| Calculus sections | 3 |
| Physics sections | 10 |
| Chemistry sections | 9 |
| Reported male/female enrollment (CRDC) | 1,352 |
These counts aren’t part of the Scope Score. “Not reported” means the federal record has no value for that item; it isn’t a zero. Enrollment counts add the male and female students the survey reports.
College destinationsclass of 2023 · state college-going records, 12 months after graduation
| Destination | Completers | % (derived) |
|---|---|---|
| University of California | 22 | 8% |
| California State University | 39 | 15% |
| California community college | 40 | 15% |
| In-state private | 6 | 2% |
| Out-of-state, 4-year | 6 | 2% |
| Out-of-state, 2-year | 1 | 0% |
| Not enrolled | 157 | 58% |
271 students who finished high school, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 42% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ all who finished high school; CDE calls them completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match.
Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$18,180 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$2,331 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,339
Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,339
District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 52%Instruction support 17%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $5,655,379,384 | 51.81% | 52% |
| Instruction support | $1,791,152,348 | 16.41% | 17% |
| Student services | $1,344,873,232 | 12.32% | 12% |
| Administration | $763,652,780 | 7.00% | 7% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $1,099,649,062 | 10.07% | 10% |
| Other | $260,356,595 | 2.39% | 2% |
| Total | $10,915,063,400 | 100.00% | 100% |
These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $10,915,063,400 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$18,180 per pupil
2020$16,355 per pupil
2019$15,793 per pupil
2018$13,247 per pupil
2017$13,549 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year
Additional workforce records
Properly assigned intern credential holders5.2%
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 91335 · not the school’s students
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $80,143 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 30% |
| ZIP-area population | 74,526 |
| Median age | 39.2 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 91335 →
Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections
- Download CSV
- Methodology
- Data updates
- State test research files, California Department of Education (opens in new tab)
- Report a data issue
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2024–25 results, compared across 1,498 high schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · AP courses the College Board approved, 2025–26 (approved to teach, not enrollment) · federal civil rights data (CRDC) 2023–24, a past snapshot · state college-going records, class of 2023, matched to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated October 15, 2026
- Its Scope Score is a high school score; results for its other grades are in these records.
Did you find what you were looking for?
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.