North Hollywood Senior High: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
North Hollywood posts 57% meeting the standard, and 36.2% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 63 | 36% | 57% | 96.2% | 72.4% | 31.4% | 0.6% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 86.6% | 33.9% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
North Hollywood Senior High scores 63 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 89th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “57% proficient” and call it done. North Hollywood deserves a closer read. The school sits in North Hollywood, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
North Hollywood's low-income kids hit 66.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 89th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 57% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 73% | 75% | 69% | 71% | 72% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 47% | 41% | 37% | 40% | 42% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 57 are proficient by 11th grade → 96 graduate → 72 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
North Hollywood's most underrated number
66.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At North Hollywood Senior High in North Hollywood, 66.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. North Hollywood Senior High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 25.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (62.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 71.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 408 students tested.
In the 2020-21 federal collection — the newest there is — Hispanic students were 66% of North Hollywood's enrollment but 49% of its AP seats; ask the school what's changed since.
● share of AP enrollment vs share of total enrollment, this school only · not part of the Scope Score
Data source: U.S. Dept. of Education Office for Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection, 2020-21 (biennial; newest published)
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
Where graduates go
Where they went after graduation
Of North Hollywood's class of 2023, 62% enrolled in college somewhere within a year — a CSU, a community college, a UC, or out of state.
Class of 2023: 619 completers, 62% enrolled somewhere within a year
Percentages are computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers) from CDE-reported counts, not a CDE-native rate.
Data source: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort — the newest published; National Student Clearinghouse match.
In fall 2025, 77 of North Hollywood's 530 graduates enrolled in the University of California system — Irvine the most common landing, with 17 enrollees.
campuses never sum to the universitywide figure — students apply to several
Peak: 93 enrolled, 2024
UC publishes this trend back to 1994 — no other destination has a comparable multi-year record
UC is one road of many — the full destination mix for the class of 2023 is below. And who applied isn't who the school taught: the ratio between the two reflects the self-selected pool of students who chose to apply, not what happened in the classroom. By the state's 2023 count, 62% of this class's predecessors enrolled in college somewhere within a year. More of the class of 2023 enrolled at community colleges (120) than at UC (85).
Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle · college-going rate: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
North Hollywood's teachers are authorized to teach 29 of the 40 AP subjects the College Board offers — well above the 14-subject median among California schools that offer AP at all — including Calculus BC, Calculus AB, and Physics C: Mechanics.
Data source: College Board AP Course Audit, 2025 - 2026 audit year (authorization, not enrollment) · IB World Schools directory, name-matched · structural depth: 2020-21 federal snapshot, table 09
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1,597 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 2,444 students, this school is well above the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 43% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is North Hollywood Senior High a good high school?
What are North Hollywood Senior High's CAASPP test scores?
How does North Hollywood Senior High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at North Hollywood Senior High?
How does North Hollywood Senior High compare to other schools in North Hollywood?
How does North Hollywood Senior High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
What AP courses are offered at North Hollywood Senior High?
How many students from North Hollywood Senior High go to UC?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 41
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 542 | 49% | 23% | 14% | 14% | 72% | +24 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 535 | 24% | 18% | 21% | 37% | 42% | +19 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 551 | 17% | 26% | 48% | 9% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 408 | 66.4% | +26 | +28 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 341 | 62.2% | +21 | +23 |
| White | 85 | 83.5% | +15 | +22 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Hollywood Senior High ← | — | 63 | 36.2% | 56.9% | — | 0.6% |
| Ulysses S. Grant Senior High | 1.8 mi | 46 | 21.5% | 46.1% | — | 1.2% |
| East Valley Senior High | 1 mi | 40 | 8.0% | 26.8% | — | 0.8% |
| Amelia Earhart Continuation | 0.1 mi | 37 | 0.0% | 9.1% | — | 1.5% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 67 | 90 | #208 | 34.9% | 59.7% | 23.6% | 0.3% | — |
| 2022 | 65 | 91 | #185 | 35.1% | 57.8% | 30.2% | 0.7% | — |
| 2023 | 63 | 89 | #232 | 32.7% | 53.0% | 30.8% | 0.7% | — |
| 2024 | 64 | 90 | #216 | 35.4% | 55.6% | 30.2% | 1.0% | — |
| 2025 | 63 | 89 | #233 | 36.2% | 56.9% | 31.4% | 0.6% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 25.0% | 34.1% | +9.1pp |
| Male | 22.1% | 29.2% | +7.1pp |
| Asian | 19.0% | 22.1% | +3.1pp |
| Black/African American | 36.2% | 33.3% | -2.9pp |
| White | 9.1% | 25.9% | +16.8pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 23.5% | 34.0% | +10.5pp |
| Two or More Races | 28.2% | 27.4% | -0.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 32.9% | 38.3% | +5.4pp |
| English Learners | 32.8% | 46.1% | +13.3pp |
| Foster Youth | 53.3% | — | — |
| Homeless | 46.9% | 52.9% | +6.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 24.7% | 34.2% | +9.5pp |
| All Students | 23.5% | 31.4% | +7.9pp |
| Filipino | — | 49.1% | — |
| Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled | GPA (applied) | GPA (admitted) | GPA (enrolled) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 219 | 163 | 77 | 3.95 | 4.06 | 4.14 |
| 2024 | 254 | 187 | 93 | 3.92 | 4.05 | 4.11 |
| 2023 | 255 | 191 | 87 | 4.01 | 4.10 | 4.11 |
| 2022 | 231 | 164 | 86 | 3.98 | 4.12 | 4.17 |
| 2021 | 172 | 110 | 49 | 3.77 | 3.98 | 4.03 |
| 2020 | 189 | 134 | 59 | 3.88 | 4.02 | 4.11 |
| 2019 | 177 | 118 | 63 | 3.81 | 3.98 | 4.02 |
| 2018 | 200 | 126 | 64 | 3.79 | 3.97 | 4.00 |
| 2017 | 194 | 121 | 71 | 3.67 | 3.84 | 3.88 |
| 2016 | 164 | 110 | 60 | 3.65 | 3.80 | 3.83 |
| 2015 | 189 | 123 | 61 | 3.69 | 3.90 | 4.01 |
| 2014 | 196 | 134 | 80 | 3.65 | 3.83 | 3.86 |
‹n = UC masks counts below n · a missing year means zero or masked — never assume zero · GPA cells blank for years with more than one contributing CEEB code (a summed GPA would be fabricated math) · GPAs live here and nowhere else on this page · Applied/Admitted/Enrolled reflect who applied, not what the school taught — no admit rate is computed or implied by this table. Series shown from 2014; full record to 1994 at the UC Infocenter.
| Campus | Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2025 | 138 | 25 | 10 |
| Berkeley | 2024 | 142 | 33 | 15 |
| Berkeley | 2023 | 159 | 32 | 9 |
| Berkeley | 2022 | 143 | 32 | 23 |
| Berkeley | 2021 | 81 | 21 | 8 |
| Davis | 2025 | 112 | 54 | 8 |
| Davis | 2024 | 138 | 71 | 17 |
| Davis | 2023 | 114 | 59 | 10 |
| Davis | 2022 | 103 | 54 | 6 |
| Davis | 2021 | 68 | 24 | 7 |
| Irvine | 2025 | 143 | 62 | 17 |
| Irvine | 2024 | 163 | 37 | 8 |
| Irvine | 2023 | 162 | 30 | 4 |
| Irvine | 2022 | 143 | 28 | 7 |
| Irvine | 2021 | 104 | 11 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2025 | 178 | 19 | 8 |
| Los Angeles | 2024 | 204 | 21 | 9 |
| Los Angeles | 2023 | 218 | 36 | 17 |
| Los Angeles | 2022 | 191 | 24 | 7 |
| Los Angeles | 2021 | 130 | 14 | 3 |
| Merced | 2025 | 52 | 51 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2024 | 36 | 33 | 3 |
| Merced | 2023 | 27 | 27 | 4 |
| Merced | 2022 | 25 | 22 | ‹3 |
| Merced | 2021 | 30 | 21 | ‹3 |
| Riverside | 2025 | 88 | 83 | 8 |
| Riverside | 2024 | 71 | 57 | 9 |
| Riverside | 2023 | 67 | 52 | 3 |
| Riverside | 2022 | 52 | 41 | 4 |
| Riverside | 2021 | 57 | 37 | ‹3 |
| San Diego | 2025 | 146 | 31 | 4 |
| San Diego | 2024 | 158 | 29 | 5 |
| San Diego | 2023 | 160 | 32 | 3 |
| San Diego | 2022 | 163 | 43 | 8 |
| San Diego | 2021 | 87 | 28 | 8 |
| Santa Barbara | 2025 | 152 | 62 | 12 |
| Santa Barbara | 2024 | 168 | 67 | 12 |
| Santa Barbara | 2023 | 164 | 102 | 33 |
| Santa Barbara | 2022 | 141 | 63 | 15 |
| Santa Barbara | 2021 | 103 | 31 | 6 |
| Santa Cruz | 2025 | 77 | 58 | 10 |
| Santa Cruz | 2024 | 119 | 81 | 15 |
| Santa Cruz | 2023 | 86 | 51 | 4 |
| Santa Cruz | 2022 | 80 | 62 | 16 |
| Santa Cruz | 2021 | 66 | 44 | 13 |
| Universitywide | 2025 | 219 | 163 | 77 |
| Universitywide | 2024 | 254 | 187 | 93 |
| Universitywide | 2023 | 255 | 191 | 87 |
| Universitywide | 2022 | 231 | 164 | 86 |
| Universitywide | 2021 | 172 | 110 | 49 |
Σ campuses ≠ universitywide — students apply to several campuses; the Universitywide row (muted) is its own independent count, never a sum of the rows above it.
| Subject | Taught by |
|---|---|
| 2-D Art and Design | this school |
| 3-D Art and Design | this school |
| African American Studies | this school |
| Art History | this school |
| Biology | this school |
| Calculus AB | this school |
| Calculus BC | this school |
| Chemistry | this school |
| Computer Science Principles | this school |
| English Language and Composition | this school |
| English Literature and Composition | this school |
| Environmental Science | this school |
| European History | this school |
| Human Geography | this school |
| Macroeconomics | this school |
| Music Theory | this school |
| Physics 1 | this school |
| Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism | this school |
| Physics C: Mechanics | this school |
| Precalculus | this school |
| Psychology | this school |
| Research | this school |
| Seminar | this school |
| Spanish Language and Culture | this school |
| Spanish Literature and Culture | this school |
| Statistics | this school |
| U.S. Government and Politics | this school |
| United States History | this school |
| World History: Modern | this school |
Authorization ≠ a section running this year — the Ledger records what the school may teach, not seat counts.
| Measure | This school |
|---|---|
| AP offered | offered |
| AP course count | 24 |
| AP enrollment | 1,054 |
| IB participation | not offered |
| Dual enrollment | offered · 14 enrolled |
| Algebra I in grade 8 | not reported |
| Calculus sections | 8 |
| Physics sections | 6 |
| Chemistry sections | 22 |
| Total enrollment (CRDC) | 2,639 |
Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.
| Destination | Completers | % (derived) |
|---|---|---|
| University of California | 85 | 13.7% |
| California State University | 110 | 17.8% |
| California community college | 120 | 19.4% |
| In-state private | 26 | 4.2% |
| Out-of-state, 4-year | 42 | 6.8% |
| Out-of-state, 2-year | 2 | 0.3% |
| Not enrolled | 234 | 37.8% |
619 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 62% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · a missing cell is CDE suppression, never a fabricated zero · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction