Maurice Sendak Elementary: The score is middle of the pack. The trajectory isn't.
Maurice Sendak sits mid-pack on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the same students across grades.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 48 | 12% | 35% | +14.1 | 19.3% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Maurice Sendak Elementary scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 63rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “35% proficient” and call it done. Maurice Sendak deserves a closer read. The school sits in North Hollywood, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +14.1pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 27th to the 63rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1900 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 35% of students meet the standard today, above the 28% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 26% | 14% | 26% | 38% | 24% |
| Grade 4 | 34% | 25% | 41% | 20% | 44% |
| Grade 5 | 33% | 43% | 30% | 52% | 43% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 31% | 25% | 29% | 41% | 27% |
| Grade 4 | 25% | 19% | 26% | 20% | 36% |
| Grade 5 | 19% | 19% | 13% | 35% | 37% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 11.1pp across grades; the floor rises 18.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Maurice Sendak Elementary in North Hollywood, 35.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Maurice Sendak Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (33.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 204 students tested.
5 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 21.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (29.9% vs 16.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$2,700 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 16% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Maurice Sendak Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Maurice Sendak Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Maurice Sendak Elementary rank in California?
Is Maurice Sendak Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Maurice Sendak Elementary?
How does Maurice Sendak Elementary compare to other schools in North Hollywood?
How does Maurice Sendak Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 73
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 78 | 6% | 18% | 28% | 47% | 24% | −19 |
| Grade 4 | 55 | 18% | 25% | 15% | 42% | 44% | −1 |
| Grade 5 | 80 | 18% | 25% | 26% | 31% | 43% | −5 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 79 | 3% | 24% | 29% | 44% | 27% | −19 |
| Grade 4 | 61 | 10% | 26% | 33% | 31% | 36% | −6 |
| Grade 5 | 82 | 18% | 18% | 23% | 40% | 37% | +1 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 82 | 4% | 12% | 65% | 20% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 204 | 35.8% | −5 | −2 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 180 | 32.8% | −8 | −6 |
| English Learners | 26 | 0.0% | −7 | −10 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Sendak Elementary ← | — | 48 | 12.1% | 35.0% | +14.1 | 0.1% |
| Carpenter Community Charter | 2.6 mi | 85 | 59.8% | 82.6% | −2.2 | 0.3% |
| Colfax Charter Elementary | 1.4 mi | 72 | 54.3% | 80.3% | −3.0 | 0.1% |
| Theodore Roosevelt Elementary | 2.2 mi | 63 | 34.5% | 64.0% | +6.2 | 0.8% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 34 | 27 | #4022 | 9.3% | 27.9% | 11.7% | 0.0% | -2.8pp |
| 2022 | 36 | 51 | #2836 | 7.0% | 24.1% | 28.2% | 0.0% | +11.4pp |
| 2023 | 33 | 36 | #3686 | 8.3% | 27.4% | 23.4% | 0.0% | -6.1pp |
| 2024 | 53 | 74 | #1517 | 11.2% | 34.4% | 17.4% | 0.1% | +4.2pp |
| 2025 | 48 | 63 | #2103 | 12.1% | 35.0% | 19.3% | 0.1% | +14.1pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 11.9% | 19.9% | +8.0pp |
| Male | 11.6% | 18.9% | +7.3pp |
| Black/African American | 16.7% | 45.5% | +28.8pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 11.0% | 19.2% | +8.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 13.3% | 22.5% | +9.2pp |
| English Learners | 10.2% | 17.3% | +7.1pp |
| Homeless | 12.5% | 17.8% | +5.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 11.0% | 19.3% | +8.3pp |
| All Students | 11.7% | 19.4% | +7.7pp |
| Filipino | — | 22.2% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction