ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Alamo

Stone Valley Middle: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Stone Valley posts 35.9% exceeding the standard — versus 16.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

3001 Miranda Avenue, 94507 (opens in new tab)·San Ramon Valley Unified·Alamo·Grades 6-8·586 students·8% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(925) 855-5800·Website
Scope Score
65
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #221 statewide · #8 of 8 in San Ramon Valley Unified

Stone Valley Middle scores 65 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 90th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “71% proficient” and call it done. Stone Valley deserves a closer read. It sits at the 90th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Stone Valley's low-income kids hit 63.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

33%
39%
28%
Grade 6 · 72% proficient
40%
44%
16%
Grade 7 · 84% proficient
36%
38%
26%
Grade 8 · 74% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 2.7pp across grades; the floor rises 2.5pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

63.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Stone Valley's most underrated number

63.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Stone Valley low-income: 63.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
35.9%
State 16.8%
19.1pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
71.1%
State 39.3%
31.8pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+4.2pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Chronic absenteeism
7.5%
State 18.5%
11.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.9%
State 3.7%
0.2pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
8.3%
State 18.0%
9.6pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic10.1%
White62.6%
Asian13.3%
Black1.0%
Other13.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 8.4% (55pp below CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
586
274 below CA avg (~860)
Student-Teacher Ratio
22:1
1 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$14,486
District avg: $12,168 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
8.3% Level 4
Share of English Learners reaching full proficiency
Teacher Salary Range
$62,631 – $126,769
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Stone Valley Middle in Alamo, 63.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Stone Valley Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.7% Math proficient); White students (74.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 52 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Absenteeism · Disabilities+6.9pp
14.4% vs 7.5% overall · n=104
Math · Disabilities−40.0pp
25.5% vs 65.5% overall · n=91
3 more gaps by subject
ELA · Disabilities−38.5pp
38.1% vs 76.6% overall · n=90
ELA Exceeded · Disabilities−29.8pp
6.4% vs 36.3% overall · n=90
Math Exceeded · Disabilities−26.4pp
9.2% vs 35.6% overall · n=91

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income53 tested
ELA 63.5%·Math 37.7%· +3.6pp vs district
White348 tested
ELA 74.3%·Math 62.6%· -0.9pp vs district
Disabilities91 tested
ELA 37.8%·Math 25.3%· -1.5pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 25.7pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +10.9pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 64%Support 35%Other 2%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$250K
$165K above CA median
Median Home Value
$2.00M
$1.34M above CA median
Bachelor's+
78%
43pp above CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
13.8 years avg experience
28 teachers · 4% second-year
Teacher Credentials
89% fully credentialed
1.7% on intern/emergency permit

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

Frequently asked questions

Is Stone Valley Middle a good middle school?
Stone Valley Middle has a Scope Score of 65 out of 100, placing it in the 90th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #221 statewide. 35.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 19.1 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Stone Valley Middle's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 71.1% of students at Stone Valley Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 35.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 35.2% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 35.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,128 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Stone Valley Middle rank in California?
Stone Valley Middle ranks #221 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 90th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Stone Valley Middle getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Stone Valley Middle increases by 4.2 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Stone Valley Middle?
7.5% of students at Stone Valley Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Stone Valley Middle compare to other schools in Alamo?
Stone Valley Middle scores 65/100 (90th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 586 students. Use the schools in Alamo page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Stone Valley Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Stone Valley Middle in Alamo, 63.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Stone Valley Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.7% Math proficient); White students (74.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 52 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
35.9%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 71th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
71.1%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 75th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 15%
+4.2pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 64th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
7.5%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 65th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 49th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
8.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 32th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 618433%39%18%10%72%+25
Grade 718140%44%8%8%84%+36
Grade 819836%38%19%7%74%+28
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 618528%31%26%15%59%+24
Grade 718136%36%16%11%73%+39
Grade 819942%23%25%10%65%+33
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1119726%27%40%7%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5263.5%+4+25
White34674.3%−1+12
Students with Disabilities9037.8%−2+21
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Stone Valley Middle ←6535.9%71.1%+4.23.9%
Los Cerros Middle2.5 mi7239.7%73.6%+3.02.6%
California average4016.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
65%65%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #215 → #242 → #232 → #329 → #221
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue