Elementary Schools in Roseville, California: Roseville schools average 4.4 points above the state — but the range is 29.0 points wide.
Roseville, California has 24 ranked elementary schools with an average Scope Score of 49.3/100 — 4.4 points above the state average of 44.8. The highest-scoring school is William Kaseberg Elementary at 65/100, where 35.9% of students exceed the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment. Roseville schools average 26.3% exceeded standard (state: 21.3%) — this exceeded-vs-met distinction reveals whether schools push students beyond proficiency or pace toward it. Chronic absenteeism averages 11.1% (below the state average of 17.9%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
| Level | Schools | Avg Score | Exceeded | vs State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elementary | 24 | Developing 49.3/100 | 26.3% | +4.4 |
| High | 6 | Developing 45.0/100 | 18.4% | +1.2 |
| Middle | 5 | Developing 49.7/100 | 25.1% | +7.1 |
How Roseville schools compare
Roseville has 24 ranked elementary schools with an average Scope Score of 49.3/100 — 4.4 points above the state average of 44.8 (CDE CAASPP 2025).
The top-ranked school is William Kaseberg Elementary with a Scope Score of 65 and 35.9% of students exceeding standard.
These schools are pushing students past the bar, not just to it. Roseville schools average 26.3% exceeding standard — well above the statewide average of 21.3%.
Chronic absenteeism in Roseville averages 11.1% — below the state average of 17.9%.
How we score · Weighted composite of test performance, growth, and school climate · Full weights on the methodology page
School archetypes in Roseville
Archetypes are data-driven labels based on Scope Score dimensions. Learn more
Every school in Roseville
ranked by Scope Score · 2024–25 CAASPP
| # | School | Exceeded | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William Kaseberg Elementary Roseville City Strong All-Around | 35.9% | Solid 65/100 |
| 2 | Quail Glen Elementary Dry Creek Joint Elementary Strong All-Around | 34.6% | Solid 64/100 |
| 3 | Junction Elementary Roseville City Strong All-Around | 34.4% | Solid 60/100 |
| 4 | Stoneridge Elementary Roseville City Strong All-Around | 34.6% | Solid 60/100 |
| 5 | West Park High Roseville Joint Union High Strong All-Around | 29.4% | Solid 58/100 |
| 6 | Woodcreek High Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 26.6% | Solid 58/100 |
| 7 | Westbrook Elementary Roseville City Building Momentum | 29.6% | Solid 58/100 |
| 8 | Blue Oaks Elementary Roseville City Building Momentum | 33.8% | Solid 57/100 |
| 9 | Barbara Chilton Middle Roseville City Building Momentum | 31.5% | Solid 56/100 |
| 10 | Warren T. Eich Middle Roseville City Building Momentum | 27.4% | Solid 55/100 |
| 11 | Diamond Creek Elementary Roseville City Solid Base | 35.0% | Solid 55/100 |
| 12 | Vencil Brown Elementary Roseville City Culture First | 29.1% | Solid 53/100 |
| 13 | Robert C. Cooley Middle Roseville City Building Momentum | 28.0% | Solid 53/100 |
| 14 | Oakmont High Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 25.0% | Solid 53/100 |
| 15 | Creekview Ranch Dry Creek Joint Elementary Building Momentum | 34.7% | Solid 52/100 |
| 16 | Heritage Oak Elementary Dry Creek Joint Elementary Building Momentum | 22.8% | Developing 50/100 |
| 17 | Coyote Ridge Elementary Dry Creek Joint Elementary Building Momentum | 23.5% | Developing 49/100 |
| 18 | Ferris Spanger Elementary Roseville City Culture First | 25.4% | Developing 49/100 |
| 19 | Silverado Middle Dry Creek Joint Elementary Building Momentum | 22.8% | Developing 48/100 |
| 20 | Fiddyment Farm Roseville City Building Momentum | 28.3% | Developing 48/100 |
| 21 | Roseville High Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 16.6% | Developing 47/100 |
| 22 | Orchard Ranch Elementary Roseville City Culture First | 28.3% | Developing 47/100 |
| 23 | Crestmont Elementary Roseville City Culture First | 20.2% | Developing 47/100 |
| 24 | Rex Fortune Elementary Center Joint Unified Culture First | 20.8% | Developing 46/100 |
| 25 | Riego Creek Elementary Roseville City Culture First | 30.3% | Developing 46/100 |
| 26 | New Pacific Charter - Roseville Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 13.4% | Developing 44/100 |
| 27 | Thomas Jefferson Elementary Roseville City Building Momentum | 35.3% | Developing 44/100 |
| 28 | Catheryn Gates Elementary Roseville City Culture First | 18.2% | Developing 43/100 |
| 29 | Independence High (Alternative) Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 12.6% | Developing 42/100 |
| 30 | George Sargeant Elementary Roseville City Building Momentum | 21.1% | Developing 41/100 |
| 31 | George A. Buljan Middle Roseville City Building Momentum | 15.8% | Developing 37/100 |
| 32 | George Cirby Elementary Roseville City Building Momentum | 14.9% | Developing 36/100 |
| 33 | John Adams Academy - Roseville Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 21.2% | Developing 36/100 |
| 34 | Bradford Woodbridge Fundamental Elementary Roseville City Building Momentum | 6.3% | Developing 36/100 |
| 35 | Adelante High (Continuation) Roseville Joint Union High Building Momentum | 0.0% | Needs Support 11/100 |
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2024-25 · Methodology
Scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data, not official CDE ratings. They represent one way of interpreting test results and should not be the sole basis for school decisions.
Private Schools in Roseville
Private schools don't participate in California's standardized testing (CAASPP) and cannot be scored or ranked. Showing enrollment, student-teacher ratio, and affiliation where available.
Numbers tell you whether students are clearing the bar. A school visit tells you whether they're happy doing it. These metrics are intentionally missing from the Scope Score: class sizes and student-teacher interaction quality; arts, music, athletics, and enrichment programs; teacher experience and turnover; campus safety and social-emotional support; parent and community engagement; quality of special education and gifted programs; how school zones and enrollment boundaries affect access. Full methodology