School district · Placer County

Roseville Joint Union High schools

Roseville Joint Union High’s 8 public high schools run from the 14th to the 92nd percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). They sit in all four bands, from Strong to Needs Support.

High · 8 schools

from 14th to 92nd · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Granite Bay High: 92nd percentile, Strong
  • West Park High: 76th percentile, Strong
  • Woodcreek High: 71st percentile, Solid
  • Oakmont High: 62nd percentile, Solid
  • Antelope High: 62nd percentile, Solid
  • John Adams Academy - Roseville: 59th percentile, Solid
  • Roseville High: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • Independence High (Alternative): 14th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
1Developing
4Solid
2Strong

One dot per school.

Elementary and middle school pictures

Elementary · 2 schools

from 1st to 43rd · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • John Adams Academy - Roseville: 43rd percentile, Developing
  • New Pacific Charter - Roseville: 1st percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
0Strong

Middle · 2 schools

from 49th to 53rd · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • New Pacific Charter - Roseville: 53rd percentile, Solid
  • John Adams Academy - Roseville: 49th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 2 of the 9 ranked schools teach more than one level, 1 of them all three, so they appear in more than one picture.

  • 9 ranked schools
  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around the Roseville Joint Union High district

10 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Roseville Joint Union High district score highest?

John Adams Academy - Roseville is highest, at the 43rd percentile.

That’s higher than 43 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Roseville Joint Union High district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the Roseville Joint Union High district score highest?

New Pacific Charter - Roseville is highest, at the 53rd percentile.

That’s higher than 53 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Roseville Joint Union High district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

High schools

Which high schools in the Roseville Joint Union High district score highest?

Granite Bay High is highest, at the 92nd percentile.

That’s higher than 92 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in the Roseville Joint Union High district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 5 high schools
Context

The average high school in the Roseville Joint Union High district had 14 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

1 high school not ranked statewide

The district

Where does Roseville Joint Union High’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Roseville Joint Union High district spent $16,984 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 57 cents of every Roseville Joint Union High dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction57%
  • Instruction support12%
  • Student services12%
  • Administration6%
  • Buildings & maintenance10%
  • Other3%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$29.1 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 18 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 14% of its $213.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 124 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 37% of the money. The plan itself puts 72% of it toward staff.

  • Professional Development and Supports in Core Contents (Math, ELA, Science) $4.4 million
  • Co-Taught Learning Support $3.3 million
  • Supportive and Healthy School Culture $3.0 million
  • 15 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

5 of the plan’s 18 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $4.4 million
  • Math $4.4 million
  • Catch-up help $3.1 million
  • English learners $0.8 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Professional Development and Supports in Core Contents (Math, ELA, Science)$4.4 million
  • Academic Supports and Services for Unduplicated Students$2.0 million
  • Multilingual Education and English Learner Support$798,504
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $14.2 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $12.0 million and estimates it spent $10.9 million, $1.1 million (9%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $1.1 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $205,521 (1%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Academic Supports and Services for Unduplicated Students, which went from $1.1 million to $2.0 million.

Largest cuts

  • Support for Dual Enrollment (DE) Program−⁠$569,788
  • Co-Taught Learning Support−⁠$437,641
  • Professional Development and Supports in Core Contents (Math, ELA, Science)−⁠$228,941

Largest increases

  • Academic Supports and Services for Unduplicated Students+⁠$918,910
  • Supportive and Healthy School Culture+⁠$329,893
  • Explicit Language Strategies+⁠$181,297

Ask: What did Support for Dual Enrollment (DE) Program pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $569,788 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 264%66%up 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 242%44%up 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 314 in 10013 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 33.1%3.0%down 0.1 pts

Goal 1 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Professional Development and Supports in Core Contents (Math, ELA, Science) · $4,364,816
  • Co-Taught Learning Support · $3,278,335
  • Supportive and Healthy School Culture · $3,014,418
The full plan3 goals, 32 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($29.1 million).

Where does the money go?

59% to Goal 2. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1RJUHSD students will be college, career, and life-ready$4.1 million14% of action budgets

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $4.7 million (−⁠$595,286) · p. 19 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Support for Career Technical Education (CTE) Program$1.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 85 ↗
  2. Support for Dual Enrollment (DE) Program$1.0 millionaction 1.4 · p. 85 ↗
  3. Support for Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) Programs$1.0 millionaction 1.3 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $155,004 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Multilingual Education and English Learner Support$0.8 millionaction 1.1 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Support for Dual Enrollment (DE) Program−⁠$0.6 million$1.6 million → $1.0 million · p. 85 ↗
  2. Support for Career Technical Education (CTE) Program−⁠$0.1 million$1.3 million → $1.2 million · p. 85 ↗
  3. Multilingual Education and English Learner Support+⁠$58,222$740,282 → $798,504 · p. 85 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Support for Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) Programs · $1.0 million → $1.0 million · p. 85 ↗−⁠$25,320

How the plan measures it · 16 measures · 3 quoted

  • Percentage of students earning a C or better in IB Courses p. 22 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 96% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 99% …
  • Percent of Students taking AP Courses p. 22 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 33% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 36% …
  • Percentage of Graduates Who Successfully Completed CTE Pathways p. 25 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 17% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 25% …

13 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Significantly reduce and ultimately eliminate the achievement gap among specific student groups, promoting…$17.1 million59% of action budgets

“Significantly reduce and ultimately eliminate the achievement gap among specific student groups, promoting educational opportunities for all students” p. 36 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $16.9 million (+⁠$188,111)

Largest funded actions

  1. Professional Development and Supports in Core Contents (Math, ELA, Science)$4.4 millionaction 2.3 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.2 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Co-Taught Learning Support$3.3 millionaction 2.5 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $196,713 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Enhance Guidance Services$2.7 millionaction 2.7 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Instructional Capacity Building$2.3 millionaction 2.1 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Academic Supports and Services for Unduplicated Students$2.0 millionaction 2.6 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.7 million is state funding counted toward those services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Explicit Language Strategies · action 2.2 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.3 million is state funding counted toward those services$1.5 million
  • Targeted Intervention and Academic Support · action 2.4 · p. 85 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • Senior Credit Recovery Program · action 2.8 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Academic Supports and Services for Unduplicated Students+⁠$0.9 million$1.1 million → $2.0 million · p. 86 ↗
  2. Co-Taught Learning Support−⁠$0.4 million$3.7 million → $3.3 million · p. 85 ↗
  3. Professional Development and Supports in Core Contents (Math, ELA, Science)−⁠$0.2 million$4.6 million → $4.4 million · p. 85 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Enhance Guidance Services · $2.7 million → $2.7 million · p. 86 ↗−⁠$32,906
  • Instructional Capacity Building · $2.4 million → $2.3 million · p. 85 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Explicit Language Strategies · $1.3 million → $1.5 million · p. 85 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Targeted Intervention and Academic Support · $889,932 → $728,255 · p. 85 ↗−⁠$161,677
  • Senior Credit Recovery Program · $325,102 → $345,110 · p. 86 ↗+⁠$20,008

How the plan measures it · 7 measures · 3 quoted

  • Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard: ELA (SBAC/CAASPP) p. 39 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 67% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 70% …
  • High School Graduation Rate p. 41 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 92% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 95% …
  • Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard: MATH (SBAC/CAASPP) p. 39 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 36% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 39% …

4 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Expand support for students and increase parent involvement$7.9 million27% of action budgets

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $7.3 million (+⁠$612,696) · p. 54 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Supportive and Healthy School Culture$3.0 millionaction 3.2 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Supportive and Safe School Culture$2.8 millionaction 3.3 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $276,830 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Parent Engagement$1.2 millionaction 3.4 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $593,502 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Data Systems$0.4 millionaction 3.5 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $264,407 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Strategy, Communication, Community Partnerships and Outreach$0.4 millionaction 3.1 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $398,231 is state funding counted toward those services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Language Translation Services · action 3.6 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Supportive and Healthy School Culture+⁠$0.3 million$2.7 million → $3.0 million · p. 86 ↗
  2. Supportive and Safe School Culture+⁠$0.2 million$2.7 million → $2.8 million · p. 86 ↗
  3. Strategy, Communication, Community Partnerships and Outreach+⁠$139,234$287,397 → $426,631 · p. 86 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Parent Engagement · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 86 ↗+⁠$5,899
  • Data Systems · $465,100 → $427,212 · p. 86 ↗−⁠$37,888
  • Language Translation Services · $25,288 → $25,200 · p. 86 ↗−⁠$88

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 1 quoted

  • Chronic Absenteeism p. 58 ↗
    Baseline
    Overall: 15% …
    Target for year 3
    Overall: 12% …

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 12,865 students
1. White: 49%2. Hispanic or Latino: 22%3. Asian: 11%4. Two or more races: 6%5. Filipino: 4%6. Black or African American: 3%7. Not reported: 2%8. Pacific Islander: <1%9. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. White49%
  2. Hispanic or Latino22%
  3. Asian11%
  4. Two or more races6%
  5. Filipino4%
  6. Black or African American3%
  7. Not reported2%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

41%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 5,288 of 12,852 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Roseville Joint Union High isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 52% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (310 of 593 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Adelante High (Continuation) (Most intensive support, graduation rate)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Roseville Joint Union High district rank highest?

Elementary: John Adams Academy - Roseville, 43rd percentile (Developing). Middle: New Pacific Charter - Roseville, 53rd percentile (Solid). High: Granite Bay High, 92nd percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Roseville Joint Union High district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Roseville Joint Union High district good?

Roseville Joint Union High’s 2 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 43rd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Roseville Joint Union High’s 2 public middle schools run from the 49th to the 53rd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 1 Developing. Roseville Joint Union High’s 8 public high schools run from the 14th to the 92nd percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 2 Strong, 4 Solid, 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Roseville Joint Union High district compare with California?

The average high school in the Roseville Joint Union High district had 14 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Roseville Joint Union High district spend per student?

The Roseville Joint Union High district spent $16,984 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 57 cents of every Roseville Joint Union High dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Roseville Joint Union High district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $29.1 million into 18 funded actions in 3 goals, 14% of its $213.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $17.1 million, 59% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Roseville Joint Union High district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

View CDE data ↗ (opens in a new tab)How Scope Scores work →

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.