Roseville City runs schools through 8th grade. Its 17 public elementary schools run from the 16th to the 86th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.
K5Elementary
68Middle
912High
Roseville City · grades K–8
Another district · grades 9–12
Elementary · 17 schools
from 16th to 86th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests
William Kaseberg Elementary: 86th percentile, Strong
Westbrook Elementary: 81st percentile, Strong
Junction Elementary: 79th percentile, Strong
Stoneridge Elementary: 79th percentile, Strong
Diamond Creek Elementary: 76th percentile, Strong
Vencil Brown Elementary: 74th percentile, Solid
Orchard Ranch Elementary: 74th percentile, Solid
Blue Oaks Elementary: 66th percentile, Solid
Thomas Jefferson Elementary: 62nd percentile, Solid
Ferris Spanger Elementary: 61st percentile, Solid
Crestmont Elementary: 58th percentile, Solid
Fiddyment Farm: 58th percentile, Solid
George Sargeant Elementary: 56th percentile, Solid
Riego Creek Elementary: 56th percentile, Solid
George Cirby Elementary: 46th percentile, Developing
The average elementary school in Roseville City had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.
Middle schools
Which middle schools in Roseville City score highest?
Warren T. Eich Middle is highest, at the 83rd percentile.
That’s higher than 83 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).
Highest in Roseville City
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean
The average middle school in Roseville City had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.
The district
Where does Roseville City’s money go, and what does it plan?
Roseville City spent $14,727 per student in the 2024–25 school year.
The typical California district spent $20,491. About 67 cents of every Roseville City dollar went to classroom instruction.
Spending by function
Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.
Share by function, 2024–25
Instruction67%
Instruction support8%
Student services11%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.
What the district plans
$156.9 million
planned in its 2026–27 plan for 38 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 77% of its $203.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.
The plan in short
Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 164 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.
Where the money goes
Three actions take 90% of the money. The plan itself puts 97% of it toward staff.
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff $134.3 million
School Mental Health Professionals and support $4.5 million
Assistant Principals $2.3 million
35 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help
5 of the plan’s 38 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.
Actions whose titles name math, catch-up help or English learners
Math $0.6 million
Catch-up help $1.4 million
English learners $0.2 million
An action naming two of these appears under both.
Largest of these
Intervention Teachers$860,209
Middle School Math Intervention teachers$586,128
Quality Mainstream English Learner Program$93,517
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students
It plans $14.2 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $14.1 million and estimates it spent $14.3 million, $0.2 million (2%) more than planned (our arithmetic).
$14.3 million spent (estimated)$14.1 million planned
What changed
The total is $7.4 million (5%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff, which went from $127.2 million to $134.3 million.
Largest cuts
Continue maintenance of quality school facilities−$807,212
Largest increases
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff+$7.1 million
School Mental Health Professionals and support+$562,224
Assistant Principals+$449,882
Ask: What did Continue maintenance of quality school facilities pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $807,212 less?
What its goals measure
Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.
What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure
2024–25
2025–26
Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
59%
57%
down 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1
51%
49%
down 2 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2
11 in 100
10 in 100
1 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 2
2.0%
2.8%
up 0.8 pts
Goal 3 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.
Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.
The plan’s own titles and amounts
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff · $134,259,599
School Mental Health Professionals and support · $4,468,728
Assistant Principals · $2,325,300
The full plan3 goals, 28 measures and where the money goes
We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($156.9 million).
Where does the money go?
88% to Goal 3. Each segment is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a segment to open its goal.
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff · $134.3 million · +$7.1 million
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff is 86% of the plan.
Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title
fell 25% or more
fell 10–25%
fell 2–10%
within 2%
grew 2–10%
grew 10–25%
grew 25% or more
new or renamed title
not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
small actions drawn together
Every goal, in the plan’s order
Goal 1All students will exhibit measurable progress toward achieving and surpassing proficiency standards in…$9.4 million6% of action budgets
“All students will exhibit measurable progress toward achieving and surpassing proficiency standards in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics” p. 24 ↗
21 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $9.6 million (−$215,700)
Largest funded actions
Professional Development$1.7 millionaction 1.8 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Directors and Administrative Assistants$0.9 millionaction 1.5 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $767,787 is state funding counted toward those services
Intervention Teachers$0.9 millionaction 1.3 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $379,894 is state funding counted toward those services
Executive Director, Director, and Coordinator$0.8 millionaction 1.15 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $590,274 is state funding counted toward those services
Coordinators$0.7 millionaction 1.9 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $641,598 is state funding counted toward those services
16 more funded actions in this goal
College and Career Pathways aligned to high schools · action 1.7 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
Title I Class Size Reduction · action 1.4 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
TK instructional assistants will be 6-hour employees · action 1.16 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
Middle School Math Intervention teachers · action 1.17 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
Executive Director of Communication and Community Engagement · action 1.25 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
iReady Assessments for progress monitoring · action 1.1 · p. 117 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
Executive Director of Assessment, Planning, and Analysis · action 1.26 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Educational Technology Programs · action 1.11 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Six-hour Kindergarten classes and five-hour Transitional Kindergarten sessions · action 1.18 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Community Liaisons · action 1.20 · p. 119 ↗$0.1 million
Quality Mainstream English Learner Program · action 1.14 · p. 118 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Translation Services · action 1.22 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
English Learner Instructional Assistants · action 1.13 · p. 118 ↗$0.1 million
LCAP Parent Survey · action 1.21 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
English Learner Newcomer Support · action 1.12 · p. 118 ↗under $0.1 million
Parent Engagement at Title I Schools · action 1.23 · p. 119 ↗under $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Title I Class Size Reduction−$0.4 million$1.0 million → $0.7 million · p. 117 ↗
Executive Director, Director, and Coordinator+$222,339$619,958 → $842,297 · p. 118 ↗
College and Career Pathways aligned to high schools−$96,964$816,810 → $719,846 · p. 117 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Professional Development · $1.7 million → $1.7 million · p. 118 ↗+$23,703
Directors and Administrative Assistants · $879,432 → $923,588 · p. 117 ↗+$44,156
Intervention Teachers · $833,541 → $860,209 · p. 117 ↗+$26,668
Coordinators · $710,285 → $733,092 · p. 118 ↗+$22,807
TK instructional assistants will be 6-hour employees · $560,630 → $649,613 · p. 118 ↗+$88,983
Middle School Math Intervention teachers · $558,936 → $586,128 · p. 118 ↗+$27,192
Executive Director of Communication and Community Engagement · $359,352 → $370,512 · p. 119 ↗+$11,160
iReady Assessments for progress monitoring · $206,871 → $251,798 · p. 117 ↗+$44,927
Executive Director of Assessment, Planning, and Analysis · $244,542 · p. 119 ↗new or renamed
English Learner Newcomer Support · $24,662 → $26,300 · p. 118 ↗+$1,638
Parent Engagement at Title I Schools · $12,251 → $12,465 · p. 119 ↗+$214
A reworded title counts as new.
How the plan measures it · 13 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 24 ↗.
Goal 2RCSD will implement actions to foster strong relationships and enhance student connectedness to effectively…$10.2 million7% of action budgets
“RCSD will implement actions to foster strong relationships and enhance student connectedness to effectively reduce rates of chronic absenteeism and behavioral issues for all students” p. 45 ↗
12 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $9.3 million (+$909,646)
Largest funded actions
School Mental Health Professionals and support$4.5 millionaction 2.5 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.3 million is state funding counted toward those services
Assistant Principals$2.3 millionaction 2.2 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.9 million is state funding counted toward those services
Health Coordinator, Health Assistants, and nurses$1.7 millionaction 2.9 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
Provide Board Certified Behavior Analysts and Instructional Assistants to support behavior and academics$0.7 millionaction 2.11 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $164,852 is state funding counted toward those services
Site Initiatives to support the LCAP goals$0.5 millionaction 2.4 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
7 more funded actions in this goal
Transportation · action 2.10 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
Attendance Monitoring Program · action 2.13 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
Safe School Plans and Safety Measures · action 2.12 · p. 120 ↗$0.1 million
Teacher in Charge (TIC) Stipends · action 2.1 · p. 119 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Second Step Curriculum · action 2.3 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Supports and Resources for Homeless Youth · action 2.6 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $515 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
Volunteer Background Checks · action 2.8 · p. 120 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
School Mental Health Professionals and support+$0.6 million$3.9 million → $4.5 million · p. 120 ↗
Assistant Principals+$0.4 million$1.9 million → $2.3 million · p. 119 ↗
Health Coordinator, Health Assistants, and nurses+$0.1 million$1.6 million → $1.7 million · p. 120 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
Provide Board Certified Behavior Analysts and Instructional Assistants to support behavior and academics · $735,730 → $726,387 · p. 120 ↗−$9,343
Site Initiatives to support the LCAP goals · $515,396 → $548,431 · p. 120 ↗+$33,035
Transportation · $224,950 → $221,450 · p. 120 ↗−$3,500
Attendance Monitoring Program · $80,134 → $79,356 · p. 120 ↗−$778
Safe School Plans and Safety Measures · $25,000 → $58,000 · p. 120 ↗+$33,000
Teacher in Charge (TIC) Stipends · $12,655 → $41,512 · p. 119 ↗+$28,857
Second Step Curriculum · $40,559 → $38,132 · p. 120 ↗−$2,427
Supports and Resources for Homeless Youth · $11,000 → $20,515 · p. 120 ↗+$9,515
0% of middle school students dropped out in 2023-2024
Target for year 3
Maintain 0% of middle school students dropping out between 2024- 2027.
7 more measures in the plan’s table.
Goal 3RCSD commits to safeguarding the district's fiscal health, maintaining high-quality facilities, strategically…$137.3 million88% of action budgets
“RCSD commits to safeguarding the district's fiscal health, maintaining high-quality facilities, strategically integrating and utilizing technology, and cultivating a collaborative and supportive culture” p. 59 ↗
5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $130.6 million (+$6.7 million)
Largest funded actions
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff$134.3 millionaction 3.4 · p. 121 ↗
Continue maintenance of quality school facilities$1.5 millionaction 3.2 · p. 121 ↗
Provide Standards-Aligned Instructional Materials$1.4 millionaction 3.3 · p. 121 ↗
California Teacher Induction Program$0.1 millionaction 3.1 · p. 121 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $41,200 is state funding counted toward those services
Provide Science Supplemental Materialsunder $0.1 millionaction 3.5 · p. 121 ↗
Changes from last year’s plan, same title
Provide Qualified Certificated and Classified Staff+$7.1 million$127.2 million → $134.3 million · p. 121 ↗
Continue maintenance of quality school facilities−$0.8 million$2.3 million → $1.5 million · p. 121 ↗
Provide Standards-Aligned Instructional Materials+$0.4 million$1.0 million → $1.4 million · p. 121 ↗
Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan
California Teacher Induction Program · $128,750 → $141,200 · p. 121 ↗+$12,450
Provide Science Supplemental Materials · $25,815 → $31,000 · p. 121 ↗+$5,185
How the plan measures it · 7 measures
None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 59 ↗.
All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.
Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends
Student mix
2024–25 · October enrollment count, 12,324 students
1White44%
2Hispanic or Latino25%
3Asian11%
4Two or more races10%
5Filipino6%
6Black or African American3%
7Pacific Islander<1%
8American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
9Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.
Free or reduced-price meals
42%
Across California, 63% of students qualify.
2024–25 · 5,218 of 12,306 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.
The district’s state records
Is the state giving the district extra help?
The state is giving Roseville City extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.
How English learners moved up on the state’s English test
From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 57% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (709 of 1,236 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.
2 schools getting state support, 2025–26
George A. Buljan Middle (Targeted support) · George Cirby Elementary (Targeted support)
This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.
Which public schools in Roseville City rank highest?
Elementary: William Kaseberg Elementary, 86th percentile (Strong). Middle: Warren T. Eich Middle, 83rd percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.
Does living in the Roseville City district decide which school my child attends?
Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)
Are the public schools in Roseville City good?
Roseville City’s 17 public elementary schools run from the 16th to the 86th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 5 Strong, 9 Solid, 2 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Roseville City’s 4 public middle schools run from the 44th to the 83rd percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Strong, 1 Solid and 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.
How does chronic absence in Roseville City compare with California?
The average elementary school in Roseville City had 10 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Roseville City had 12 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.
How much does Roseville City spend per student?
Roseville City spent $14,727 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 67 cents of every Roseville City dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.
What is in Roseville City’s 2026–27 spending plan?
The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $156.9 million into 38 funded actions in 3 goals, 77% of its $203.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $137.3 million, 88% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.
Where do these results come from?
California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.
Sources and methodology
This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Roseville City, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.
Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26
Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.