English
Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 255 tested
- Advanced
- 31%
- Proficient
- 25%
- Below the standard
- 44%
56% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.
Public school · Roseville City · Roseville, California
Roseville · TK–5 · 498 students (2024–25)
The dots are California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built →
Weighted composite · 2025–26
A weighted mix of six measures.
Well above California in English (reading and writing) and math, grades 3–5, spring 2026: 56% and 56% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 46% and 42%.
From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”).
Choose up to four elementary schools.
Type at least two characters to search.
Blue Oaks Elementary’s 2025–26 test results, released October 15, 2026, are on this page.
Campus map · © OpenStreetMap
Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.
A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.
Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.
On spring 2025 tests, students in grades 4 and 5 scored above what the state expected in English (+13 pts) and math (+17 pts). The state bases that expectation on each student’s earlier scores.
Ask Roseville City which school serves your address. Evidence ↓
Blue Oaks Elementary scores higher than 66 in 100 of California’s 5,726 scored public elementary schools: 66th percentile, Solid, spring 2026. Evidence ↓
In 2025–26, 9 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 10 in 100 at the average Roseville City elementary school. 1.8% of students (10 of 550) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school. Evidence ↓
Yes, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored +13 points against the state’s expected score in English, which the state calls Accelerated. In math, they scored +17 points, which it calls Accelerated.
In spring 2026, 38% of low-income students in grades 3–5 at Blue Oaks Elementary in Roseville scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 36% for the same group across California. Evidence ↓
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Blue Oaks Elementary's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Robert C. Cooley Middle. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary doesn’t guarantee placement; confirm your address with the district.
The questions drawn from this page are under Next steps, ready to copy. Evidence ↓
Academic achievement
Well above California in both subjects.
State tests (CAASPP), spring 2026
In grades 3–5, spring 2026, 56% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 56% in math, against 46% and 42% across California.
Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 255 tested
56% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.
Grades 3–5 · spring 2026 · 257 tested
56% Proficient or Advanced in grades 3–5.
What each level means: California's level descriptions.
English
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 51% | 54% | 60% |
| Advanced | 28% | 33% | 31% |
| Proficient | 23% | 21% | 29% |
| Developing level | 24% | 23% | 14% |
| Minimal | 25% | 23% | 26% |
| Tested | 69 | 90 | 96 |
| California | 44% | 46% | 49% |
| Difference | +7 | +8 | +11 |
California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
Math
| Measure | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proficient or Advanced | 54% | 63% | 51% |
| Advanced | 23% | 30% | 34% |
| Proficient | 31% | 33% | 17% |
| Developing level | 22% | 19% | 19% |
| Minimal | 24% | 18% | 30% |
| Tested | 71 | 90 | 96 |
| California | 47% | 42% | 37% |
| Difference | +7 | +21 | +14 |
California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).
A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.
New to these scores? Read CAASPP scores explained: how to read your child’s report →
English results were lower than in 2025; math results were similar. English went from 63% to 56% and math from 60% to 56%.
This school
California, same grades46% → 46%2025 → 2026 · 1,232,086 → 1,208,894 tested
This school
California, same grades41% → 42%2025 → 2026 · 1,241,652 → 1,211,701 tested
Each year is a different group of students.
Yes, in both subjects. California sets an expected score for each student from that student’s own score the year before. In 2025, students here in grades 4 and 5 scored +13 points against that expected score in English, which the state calls Accelerated. In math, they scored +17 points, which it calls Accelerated.
Grades 4 and 5 · 2025 · 164 students with scores in both years
Points above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores.
+13 pts
The state calls it Accelerated, the fourth of its five growth levels.
+17 pts
The state calls it Accelerated, the fourth of its five growth levels.
Ask: How does the school check what’s working in English?
| Students | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 3–5 · This school | 31% | 25% | 19% | 25% | 255 |
| English, grades 3–5 · California | 24% | 22% | 21% | 33% | 1,208,894 |
| English, grades 3–5 · Roseville City | 30% | 26% | 21% | 23% | 4,035 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · This school | 30% | 26% | 20% | 24% | 257 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · California | 21% | 21% | 25% | 33% | 1,211,701 |
| Math, grades 3–5 · Roseville City | 26% | 25% | 25% | 24% | 4,046 |
Below the standard combines the state’s Developing and Minimal levels, its two lowest. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. The state comparison combines CDE’s rows for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation). The district row combines its public schools in the same grades, weighted by students tested.
English and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Chart and table: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year.
The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional.
2026 was the lowest year in this series in both subjects. Each year is a different group of students.
| Year | This school | California |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 76% 272 tested | 45% 1,384,680 tested |
| 2018 | 71% 248 tested | 49% 1,346,907 tested |
| 2019 | 79% 228 tested | 50% 1,332,547 tested |
| 2022 | 69% 242 tested | 45% 1,260,830 tested |
| 2023 | 67% 238 tested | 44% 1,247,801 tested |
| 2024 | 60% 256 tested | 45% 1,235,509 tested |
| 2025 | 63% 269 tested | 46% 1,232,086 tested |
| 2026 | 56% 255 tested | 46% 1,208,894 tested |
| Year | This school | California |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 72% 272 tested | 40% 1,392,040 tested |
| 2018 | 69% 248 tested | 42% 1,352,321 tested |
| 2019 | 72% 229 tested | 44% 1,338,625 tested |
| 2022 | 65% 242 tested | 38% 1,265,943 tested |
| 2023 | 66% 239 tested | 40% 1,256,519 tested |
| 2024 | 64% 254 tested | 41% 1,249,262 tested |
| 2025 | 60% 275 tested | 41% 1,241,652 tested |
| 2026 | 56% 257 tested | 42% 1,211,701 tested |
California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 13 points above that expected score, and in math 17 points above it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.
The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.
Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.
Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.
What you can do
Roseville City’s board decides Blue Oaks’ plan.
The state hasn’t placed Blue Oaks in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source
The state is giving Roseville City extra help in 2026. It qualified on the 2025 California School Dashboard. The county office must help the district for at least three years, including a review of its yearly plan.
Extra help for Roseville City: CDE’s assistance status file for the 2025 California School Dashboard. Source
Roseville City’s board must adopt its yearly plan (LCAP) by July 1, after at least one public hearing at an earlier meeting.
How to take part
California law requires schools to screen kindergartners through second graders for reading difficulties every year, with some exceptions. You get notice at least 15 days before, results within 45 days, and can opt out in writing.
Kindergartners can’t be screened before the 91st school day; transitional kindergarten isn’t covered.
If screening shows your child may be at risk for reading difficulties, the school must provide supports. That result isn’t a diagnosis, and screening can’t be used to delay a special-education evaluation.
Ask how many K–2 students screening found at risk last year, and how many got extra reading help.
California Education Code § 53008. Source
Life at school
9 in 100 students were chronically absent in 2025–26.
State attendance and suspension records, 2025–26
That means they missed 10% or more of school days. 1.8% of students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.6% at the average California elementary school.
Context Close to the 10 in 100 at the average Roseville City elementary school: a pattern across the district.
49 of 537 students were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10% or more of school days.
1.8%
of students were suspended at least once (10 of 550). Average California elementary school 1.6%.
Ask: When a child starts missing school, who calls the family, and how soon?
Ask current families how the school keeps them informed, and what happened when their child needed help. Ask staff how long teachers tend to stay.
Teach here? Tell us Roseville City’s email domain so staff can answer our workplace questions.
Every learner
Student groups, grades 3–5, spring 2026
Proficient or Advanced, grades 3–5 English, spring 2026. In math the same groups run from 25% to 58%; every value is in the table below. English learners: grades 3 and 4 only.
48% of English learners here moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026.
Spring 2025 to spring 2026 · English learners with state English test (ELPAC) scores in both years
It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
37%of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 183 of 498. California: 63%.
29teachers, 2024–25
16 yearsaverage experience, 2024–25
0%in their first year, 2024–25
98%of teaching positions with proper credential and placement, 2021–22
Ask: Which student groups does the school track most closely, and what does it do when one falls behind?
| Group and subject | Here | vs Roseville City | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 100 tested in English, 102 in math | |||
| English | 38% | −442% | +236% |
| Math | 37% | +235% | +631% |
| White · 124 tested in English, 125 in math | |||
| English | 59% | +158% | −160% |
| Math | 58% | +454% | +256% |
| Hispanic or Latino · 50 tested | |||
| English | 46% | −147% | +1036% |
| Math | 44% | +539% | +1331% |
| English learners · 34 tested in English, 36 in math · grades 3 and 4 only | |||
| English | 15% | −318% | +114% |
| Math | 25% | +421% | +619% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Roseville City, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.
Students of two or more races and students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. Asian students, 34 tested in English and 35 in math: no rate for grade 5 in our records, and fewer than 30 tested in the grades with one. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
| Students, 2025–26 | Here |
|---|---|
| White | 50% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 17% |
| Asian | 15% |
| Two or more races | 10% |
| Black or African American | 4% |
| Filipino | 3% |
| American Indian or Alaska Native | — |
| Pacific Islander | — |
| Not reported | — |
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares are of the students the file counts for attendance (CDE’s “eligible enrollment”); unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
CDE SARC report 2024–25, measured 2021–22: 98% of teaching positions, 23.2 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 23.5 total position FTE (FTEs as rounded by the source; the share is CDE’s own). This measures positions, not individual teachers.
Next steps
Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level. Explore schools on the map
Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
61st percentile · Solid · middle · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking. Older zone links come from the federal School Attendance Boundary Survey (NCES SABS).
Ask Roseville City which school serves your address.
Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm which school serves your address with Roseville City.
Office (916) 771-17008150 Horncastle Avenue, directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
The closest elementary schools, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.
Every figure on this page, with its source, grades, year and count.
| Factor | School | Index | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advancedaverage of English and math | 30% | 58 | 42% |
| Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math | 56% | 60 | 23% |
| 5th graders in 2026 against 3rd graders in 2024 (partly different children) | +69 scale-score pts | 39 | 20% |
| Chronically absent | 9 in 100 | 62 | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.8% (10 of 550) | 49 | 5% |
| English learners: top level | 10% | 41 | 5% |
Index is where the school's value sits among the California elementary schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.
| School year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 44 | 66 | #1926 | California elementary schools · 5,726 schools · current formula |
2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.
| School year | Chronic absence | Suspension | Grade gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19 | 5 in 100 | 0.8% (4 of 528) | −7 |
| 2021–22 | not on file | not on file | +1 |
| 2022–23 | not on file | not on file | +5 |
| 2023–24 | 14 in 100 | 0.9% (5 of 542) | −3 |
| 2024–25 | 10 in 100 | 1.6% (9 of 556) | +5 |
| 2025–26 | 9 in 100 | 1.8% (10 of 550) | +4 |
Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.
English and math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Top level | Top two levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · English | 255 | 31% | 56% |
| 2026 · Math | 257 | 30% | 56% |
| 2025 · English | 269 | 37% | 63% |
| 2025 · Math | 275 | 31% | 60% |
| 2024 · English | 256 | 36% | 60% |
| 2024 · Math | 254 | 34% | 64% |
| 2023 · English | 238 | 43% | 67% |
| 2023 · Math | 239 | 33% | 66% |
| 2022 · English | 242 | 40% | 69% |
| 2022 · Math | 242 | 39% | 65% |
| 2019 · English | 228 | 48% | 79% |
| 2019 · Math | 229 | 43% | 72% |
| 2018 · English | 248 | 44% | 71% |
| 2018 · Math | 248 | 42% | 69% |
| 2017 · English | 272 | 47% | 76% |
| 2017 · Math | 272 | 42% | 72% |
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met or exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 · Grade 3 · English | 89 | 55% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · English | 93 | 70% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · English | 87 | 63% |
| 2025 · Grade 3 · Math | 91 | 57% |
| 2025 · Grade 4 · Math | 97 | 63% |
| 2025 · Grade 5 · Math | 87 | 60% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · English | 87 | 56% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · English | 81 | 59% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · English | 88 | 64% |
| 2024 · Grade 3 · Math | 87 | 70% |
| 2024 · Grade 4 · Math | 81 | 65% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · Math | 86 | 57% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · English | 74 | 66% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · English | 81 | 59% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · English | 83 | 76% |
| 2023 · Grade 3 · Math | 74 | 66% |
| 2023 · Grade 4 · Math | 82 | 66% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · Math | 83 | 66% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · English | 76 | 68% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · English | 81 | 63% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · English | 85 | 76% |
| 2022 · Grade 3 · Math | 75 | 69% |
| 2022 · Grade 4 · Math | 81 | 62% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · Math | 86 | 64% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · English | 72 | 81% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · English | 65 | 75% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · English | 91 | 80% |
| 2019 · Grade 3 · Math | 72 | 82% |
| 2019 · Grade 4 · Math | 66 | 65% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · Math | 91 | 68% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · English | 67 | 78% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · English | 92 | 71% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · English | 89 | 67% |
| 2018 · Grade 3 · Math | 67 | 78% |
| 2018 · Grade 4 · Math | 92 | 67% |
| 2018 · Grade 5 · Math | 89 | 64% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · English | 91 | 84% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · English | 88 | 75% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · English | 93 | 69% |
| 2017 · Grade 3 · Math | 91 | 74% |
| 2017 · Grade 4 · Math | 88 | 67% |
| 2017 · Grade 5 · Math | 93 | 76% |
Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | Advanced | Proficient | Developing level | Minimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 96 | 23% | 31% | 38% | 8% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Group · English | Tested | Proficient or Advanced | vs district | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 100 | 38% | −4 | +2 |
| White | 124 | 59% | +1 | −1 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 50 | 46% | −1 | +10 |
| Group | English | n | CDE category | Math | n | CDE category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All students | +13 | 164 | Accelerated | +17 | 164 | Accelerated |
| English-only students | +12 | 133 | not categorized | +15 | 133 | not categorized |
| White | +9 | 84 | Accelerated | +17 | 84 | Accelerated |
| Low-income | −4 | 52 | Average | +8 | 52 | Accelerated |
| Hispanic or Latino | +25 | 30 | Exceptional | +13 | 30 | Accelerated |
| English learners | +15 | 27 | Accelerated | +27 | 27 | Exceptional |
| Students with disabilities | +8 | 20 | Accelerated | +10 | 20 | Accelerated |
| Two or more races | −3 | 19 | Average | +14 | 19 | Accelerated |
| Asian | +5 | 18 | Accelerated | +14 | 18 | Accelerated |
| Recently reclassified as fluent in English | +17 | 15 | not categorized | +27 | 15 | not categorized |
| English learners only | +9 | 12 | not categorized | +24 | 12 | not categorized |
CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 4 and 5. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
State model · English+13 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4 and 5California growth model, English: +13 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Accelerated, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.State model · math+17 pts vs expected
matched students, grades 4 and 5California growth model, math: +17 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Accelerated, against SchoolScope's +2-point median for California elementary school records.CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 10 in 100 → 2025–26 · 9 in 100 · −1 in 100 |
| Suspension rate2024–25 · 1.6% (9 of 556) → 2025–26 · 1.8% (10 of 550) · +0.2 percentage points |
| Group | 2018–19 | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4 in 100 | 10 in 100 | +6 in 100 |
| Male | 6 in 100 | 8 in 100 | +2 in 100 |
| Asian | 5 in 100 | 9 in 100 | +4 in 100 |
| Filipino | 5 in 100 | 17 in 100 | +12 in 100 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 8 in 100 | 13 in 100 | +5 in 100 |
| Two or more races | 6 in 100 | 4 in 100 | −2 in 100 |
| White | 4 in 100 | 8 in 100 | +4 in 100 |
| Students with disabilities | 12 in 100 | 14 in 100 | +2 in 100 |
| English learners | 6 in 100 | 10 in 100 | +4 in 100 |
| Low-income | 9 in 100 | 14 in 100 | +5 in 100 |
| All students | 5 in 100 | 9 in 100 | +4 in 100 |
| Black or African American | — | 9 in 100 | — |
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 11,008 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 498
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 498
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
| Group | Dollars | Share, to two decimals | Printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction | $117,584,477 | 67.19% | 67% |
| Instruction support | $14,105,968 | 8.06% | 8% |
| Student services | $18,702,442 | 10.69% | 11% |
| Administration | $10,632,722 | 6.08% | 6% |
| Buildings & maintenance | $13,791,585 | 7.88% | 8% |
| Total | $175,008,276 | 100.00% | 100% |
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $136,750 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 47% |
| ZIP-area population | 83,902 |
| Median age | 40.2 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95747 →
Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 5,726 elementary schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026
How we analyze · Request a correction
Optional and anonymous. Up to 280 characters.
What brought you here? Optional
Thanks — that helps.