Ferris Spanger Elementary: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Ferris Spanger posts 53% meeting the standard, and 25.4% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 49 | 25% | 53% | +0.5 | 10.8% | 1.0% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Ferris Spanger Elementary scores 49 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 65th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “53% proficient” and call it done. Ferris Spanger deserves a closer read. The school sits in Roseville, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 65th percentile since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 53% of students meet the standard today, above the 49% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 50% | 37% | 59% | 51% | 56% |
| Grade 4 | 49% | 38% | 31% | 42% | 57% |
| Grade 5 | 72% | 41% | 38% | 30% | 56% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 39% | 46% | 59% | 56% | 45% |
| Grade 4 | 42% | 32% | 50% | 48% | 55% |
| Grade 5 | 42% | 27% | 27% | 21% | 46% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Ferris Spanger Elementary in Roseville, 47.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 46.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ferris Spanger Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (38.5% Math proficient); White students (62.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 11.5 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 90 students tested.
7 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 2.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -0.0pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$632 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 46% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ferris Spanger Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Ferris Spanger Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Ferris Spanger Elementary rank in California?
Is Ferris Spanger Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Ferris Spanger Elementary?
How does Ferris Spanger Elementary compare to other schools in Roseville?
How does Ferris Spanger Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 62
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 46
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 48 | 27% | 29% | 21% | 23% | 56% | +13 |
| Grade 4 | 49 | 41% | 16% | 22% | 20% | 57% | +12 |
| Grade 5 | 48 | 27% | 29% | 25% | 19% | 56% | +8 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 49 | 16% | 29% | 33% | 22% | 45% | −1 |
| Grade 4 | 49 | 18% | 37% | 20% | 24% | 55% | +14 |
| Grade 5 | 48 | 23% | 23% | 31% | 23% | 46% | +11 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 48 | 21% | 25% | 50% | 4% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 90 | 47.8% | +2 | +10 |
| White | 82 | 62.2% | +1 | +0 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 45 | 46.7% | −2 | +8 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferris Spanger Elementary ← | — | 49 | 25.4% | 52.6% | +0.5 | 1.0% |
| William Kaseberg Elementary | 1.3 mi | 65 | 35.9% | 63.2% | +8.4 | 0.8% |
| Maria Montessori Charter Academy | 2.5 mi | 64 | 36.5% | 73.1% | −2.8 | 0.2% |
| Rock Creek Elementary | 2.6 mi | 57 | 33.0% | 60.7% | −13.7 | 1.6% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 54 | 72 | #1525 | 24.8% | 49.1% | 9.4% | 1.8% | +12.5pp |
| 2022 | 37 | 53 | #2719 | 9.6% | 36.9% | 36.0% | 0.6% | -7.3pp |
| 2023 | 28 | 19 | #4611 | 16.1% | 43.9% | 28.0% | 0.9% | -26.9pp |
| 2024 | 42 | 50 | #2889 | 18.5% | 41.3% | 17.6% | 2.3% | -27.9pp |
| 2025 | 49 | 65 | #2026 | 25.4% | 52.6% | 10.8% | 1.0% | +0.5pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 7.4% | 10.6% | +3.2pp |
| Male | 11.3% | 9.6% | -1.7pp |
| Asian | 23.1% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 9.7% | 10.5% | +0.8pp |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 4.3% | +4.3pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 23.3% | 15.2% | -8.1pp |
| English Learners | 14.3% | 11.5% | -2.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 12.8% | 13.9% | +1.1pp |
| All Students | 9.4% | 10.1% | +0.7pp |
| Black/African American | — | 36.4% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction