ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Foothill Middle

Middle School
📍 2775 Cedro Lane
Composite Score
out of 100
State Percentile
of middle schools
State Rank
of 1,714 California middle schools
🤝
Culture First

Strong school culture with high family engagement, even if test scores are still developing.

Composite scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data from the California Dept. of Education (CAASPP, chronic absenteeism, suspension rates). They are not official CDE ratings and should not be the sole basis for school decisions. See methodology.

School overview

Enrollment
947 students
Student-Teacher Ratio
26:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
9%
Teachers
36 full-time

Dashboard indicators

ELA Year-over-Year
Increased
+11.0 pts DFS change
Math Year-over-Year
Increased
+14.2 pts DFS change
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
56.5%
English learners at Level 4 (Well Developed) · 23 tested

Data source: California School Dashboard 2025, ELPAC 2024

Student demographics

Hispanic16.1%
White47.5%
Asian14.4%
Black0.5%
Other21.5%

Performance breakdown

Performance breakdown for Foothill Middle
CategoryPercentage
Exceeded Standard36.2%
Met Standard32.4%
Below Standard31.4%

What other rankings don't show you

Most rating sites report "69% proficient" for Foothill Middle and stop there. Here's what that number hides:

36.2% of students exceeded standard while 32.4% met it. That exceeded rate is 18.8 points above the state average of 17.3%. That's 17.6 points above the Mt. Diablo Unified district average of 18.5%. Compared to the 2 nearby schools within ~3 miles, this exceeded rate is 15.3 points higher (vs 20.8% average). The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Proficiency drops by 10.7 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth — a signal that the school may not be sustaining early gains.

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased and Math increased year-over-year. 56.5% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism is 7.9%, better than the state average of 19.3%.

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters →

Key metrics

% Exceeded Standard
36.2%
Students scoring above proficient
% Met or Above
68.6%
Students meeting standard
Growth (G6→G8)
-10.7pp
Change in proficiency rate
Chronic Absenteeism
7.9%
Students missing 10%+ of days
Suspension Rate
0.6%
Students suspended at least once
Total Tested
1,966
Across all grades & subjects

Grade trajectory

ELA Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8
Math Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th31533.3%41.6%16.8%8.3%74.9%
7th32533.2%40.0%17.2%9.5%73.2%
8th34429.4%40.4%19.5%10.8%69.8%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th31345.7%27.2%15.7%11.5%72.8%
7th32342.4%21.7%21.1%14.9%64.1%
8th34633.0%23.7%23.4%19.9%56.6%
K-12 Feeder PathBoundary data

Feeder patterns derived from 2015-16 NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries may have changed. Contact your school district for current information.

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog