ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Washington Manor Middle · San Leandro

Washington Manor Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Washington Manor posts 32% meeting the standard and 12.3% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1170 Fargo Avenue, 94579 (opens in new tab)·San Lorenzo Unified·San Leandro·Grades 6-8·500 students·74% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 317-5500
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3843
% Exceeded12%17%
% Met+32%39%
Growth+3.0+1.5
Absence17.9%18.5%
Suspension3.7%3.7%
Scope Score
38
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #1,256 statewide · #2 of 4 in San Lorenzo Unified

Washington Manor Middle scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 44th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Washington Manor deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Leandro, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 44th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 32% meet the standard today, versus 38% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 644%37%31%37%37%
Grade 753%38%37%37%33%
Grade 840%45%38%35%37%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 621%27%27%29%27%
Grade 740%28%29%25%25%
Grade 828%38%24%26%33%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

11%
26%
63%
Grade 6 · 37% proficient
9%
24%
67%
Grade 7 · 33% proficient
9%
27%
64%
Grade 8 · 36% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 1.7pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.3%
State 16.8%
4.6pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+3.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
32.0%
State 39.3%
7.3pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.9%
State 18.5%
0.6pp below state avg
Suspension rate
3.7%
State 3.7%
0.0pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.4%
State 18.0%
0.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Washington Manor Middle in San Leandro, 29.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 25.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Washington Manor Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 356 students tested.

All students at this school: 32% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 32%, district —, state 39%32%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 22%, state 32%27% · −5 vs school
MaleMale: this school 31%, district 27%, state 42%31% · −1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 33%, district 27%, state 44%33% · +1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 20%, state 32%21% · −11 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 56%, district 50%, state 72%56% · +24 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 7%, district 7%, state 11%7% · −25 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 6%, state 15%8% · −24 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 40%, district 48%, state 65%40% · +8 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 18%, district 10%, state 26%18% · −14 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 30%, district 27%, state 56%30% · −2 vs school

5 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 0.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -2.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.9%, district 24.9%, state 18.5%17.9% · −0.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.7%, district —, state 3.7%3.7% · +0.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.1%
Grades 7–817.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 22:125:1
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience16.4 years
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$69,152 – $136,428
Principal salary$161,236 – $176,480
Superintendent salary$407,524

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,530, CA average $14,815$23,530 · spent at this school
Federal share$424 per student

$424 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,271 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction60%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,346 per pupil
2019$13,545 per pupil
2018$13,748 per pupil
2017$11,408 per pupil
2016$11,052 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic46.8%
District 58.1% · CA 56.1%
Asian23.6%
District 17.7% · CA 10.2%
Other17.2%
District 11.8% · CA 9.0%
Black6.6%
District 7.3% · CA 4.8%
White5.8%
District 5.2% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 74.0% (10pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$99K · CA $85K
Median home value$850K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+28% · CA 35%
ZIP population20,017
Median age46 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Washington Manor Middle a good middle school?

Washington Manor Middle has a Scope Score of 38 out of 100, placing it in the 44th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,256 statewide. 12.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.6 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Washington Manor Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 32.0% of students at Washington Manor Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 953 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Washington Manor Middle rank in California?

Washington Manor Middle ranks #1,256 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 44th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Washington Manor Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Washington Manor Middle increases by 3.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Washington Manor Middle?

17.9% of students at Washington Manor Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Washington Manor Middle compare to other schools in San Leandro?

Washington Manor Middle scores 38/100 (44th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 500 students. Use the schools in San Leandro page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Washington Manor Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Washington Manor Middle in San Leandro, 29.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 25.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Washington Manor Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (26.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 31.8 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 356 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
12.3%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 45th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+3.0pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 50th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
32.0%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 44th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.9%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.7%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 50th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 45th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 613611%26%29%35%37%−10
Grade 71699%24%30%37%33%−15
Grade 81719%27%31%32%37%−9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 613713%14%26%47%27%−8
Grade 717011%14%28%46%25%−9
Grade 817019%14%21%46%33%+1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111736%17%61%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged35629.8%+4−8
Hispanic/Latino22126.2%+2−13
Asian11156.8%+6−18
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Washington Manor Middle ←3812.3%32.0%+3.03.7%
KIPP Summit Academy1 mi7746.3%73.0%−2.01.5%
John Muir Middle2.1 mi4212.8%34.1%−3.53.4%
Bohannon Middle1.6 mi327.5%28.2%−8.16.8%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193643#114411.9%37.6%7.2%6.8%+1.8pp
20224058#90612.0%35.5%31.0%5.5%+9.7pp
20233844#12199.1%31.0%19.2%6.7%+1.9pp
20242724#16768.9%31.4%19.0%6.9%-3.0pp
20253844#125612.3%32.0%17.9%3.7%+3.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.5%18.1%+11.6pp
Male7.8%17.6%+9.8pp
Asian0.5%4.9%+4.4pp
Black/African American11.3%32.4%+21.1pp
White6.3%3.5%-2.8pp
Hispanic/Latino9.0%23.0%+14.0pp
Two or More Races25.0%26.9%+1.9pp
Students with Disabilities23.3%32.6%+9.3pp
English Learners7.5%13.7%+6.2pp
Homeless38.5%75.0%+36.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged8.3%19.4%+11.1pp
All Students7.2%17.9%+10.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction