Charter school · San Lorenzo Unified
KIPP Summit Academy
San Lorenzo · 5–8 · 427 students (2024–25)
Well above California in English and math: 83% and 63% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 36% statewide. Source
- Source
- CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
- Students
- all students tested in grades 6–8: 313 in English, 314 in math
- Comparison
- California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,266,619 in English and 1,272,526 in math tested).
This rating covers grades 6–8. KIPP Summit Academy teaches 5–8: grade 5 results ↓
Save
Get an email when KIPP Summit Academy’s 2025–26 results land
One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.
Almost done — check your email and confirm to start getting alerts. Sent to .
You’re set. We’ll email your account address when the results land.
What stands out
Tap a line for its sourceStrengthSource+33 ptsEnglishabove expected+21 ptsMathabove expectedIn 2025, students in grades 5–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Exceptional.
- Source
- CDE growth model, 2025
- Students
- students with scores in both years in grades 5–8: 414
- Comparison
- 414 students in grades 5–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
StrengthSource50%Englishexceeded the standard42%Mathexceeded the standard50% in English and 42% in math reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 19% and 20% across California in the same grades.
- Source
- CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
- Students
- all students tested in grades 6–8: 313 in English, 314 in math
- Comparison
- California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,266,619 in English and 1,272,526 in math tested).
Kids like mine· low-income studentsSource81%Englishmet or exceeded62%Mathmet or exceededLow-income students here (323 tested in English, 324 in math, grades 5–8, spring 2025) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (38% and 24%).
- Source
- CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2025
- Students
- low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 5–8: 323 in English, 324 in math
- Comparison
- California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 323 students in English and 324 in math.
Is it good?
Grades 6–8 are well above California. Grade 5 are also well above it.
Share of students tested.
Show these bars as a table
| Exceeded | Met | Nearly met | Not met | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| English, grades 6–8 · KIPP Summit Academy | 50% | 33% | 10% | 7% |
| English, grades 6–8 · California | 19% | 30% | 23% | 28% |
| Math, grades 6–8 · KIPP Summit Academy | 42% | 21% | 21% | 16% |
| Math, grades 6–8 · California | 20% | 16% | 23% | 41% |
| English, grade 5 · KIPP Summit Academy | 52% | 31% | 11% | 6% |
| English, grade 5 · California | 23% | 26% | 19% | 32% |
| Math, grade 5 · KIPP Summit Academy | 53% | 20% | 18% | 9% |
| Math, grade 5 · California | 20% | 16% | 25% | 39% |
tests20%40%60%80%20192022202572%50%83%This school49%California
tests20%40%60%80%20192022202557%38%63%This school36%California
Show the years as a table
| Met or exceeded | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English · This school | 72% | 72% | 69% | 78% | 83% |
| English · California | 50% | 47% | 46% | 46% | 49% |
| Math · This school | 57% | 46% | 50% | 58% | 63% |
| Math · California | 38% | 31% | 32% | 33% | 36% |
2025 was the highest year in this series in both subjects. Each year is a different group of students.
Kids like mine
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students and English learners here did far better than the same groups statewide.
| Group and subject | Here | vs San Lorenzo Unified | vs California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income · 323 tested in English, 324 in math | |||
| English | 81% | +5724% | +4338% |
| Math | 62% | +4715% | +3824% |
| Asian · 222 tested in English, 223 in math | |||
| English | 92% | +4151% | +1676% |
| Math | 83% | +3746% | +1370% |
| Hispanic or Latino · 156 tested | |||
| English | 69% | +4623% | +3138% |
| Math | 38% | +2513% | +1424% |
| English learners · 67 tested · grades 5 and 6 and 8 only | |||
| English | 40% | +364% | +328% |
| Math | 33% | +294% | +267% |
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in San Lorenzo Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Read the student-group results as sentences
At KIPP Summit Academy in San Lorenzo, 81.1% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 5, 6, 7 and 8, compared to 24.1% district-wide for those same grades and 37.7% statewide for those same grades. KIPP Summit Academy’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 57.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (62.0% met or exceeded the Math standard); Asian students (91.9% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 43.6 percentage points: English learners in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 324 ELA grade test records.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
15 of 428 students missed 10% or more of school days.
| Chronically absent, 2024–25 | Per 100 students | Students |
|---|---|---|
| Grades 4–6 | 3 | 7 of 217 |
| Grades 7–8 | 4 | 8 of 211 |
Who goes here
Students and staff
| Students, 2024–25 | Here |
|---|---|
| Asian | 52% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 37% |
| Filipino | 4% |
| Black or African American | 3% |
About 3 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (76%, 323 of 427). California: 63%.
Teachers, 2024–25
Getting in
Ask KIPP Summit Academy how it admits students.
Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.
2005 Via Barrett Suite A, San Lorenzo 94580 · summit.kippnorcal.org
- Arroyo HighNearest high school, about 0.8 mi. Not a confirmed feeder.42ndDeveloping
- Washington Manor Middle1.0 mi42ndDeveloping
- Bohannon Middle1.2 mi26thDeveloping
- Edendale Middle2.2 mi1stNeeds Support
Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.
Questions
Questions to ask
The questions from this page, in one place.
How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
Call (510) 258-0106 to ask about a visit.
Common questions
Is KIPP Summit Academy a good middle school?
What are KIPP Summit Academy's CAASPP test scores?
How does KIPP Summit Academy rank in California?
Is KIPP Summit Academy getting better or worse?
What do attendance and suspension records show for KIPP Summit Academy?
How does KIPP Summit Academy compare to other schools in San Lorenzo?
What do reported student-group results show at KIPP Summit Academy?
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
KIPP Summit Academy is ranked #84 statewide · #1 of 4 in San Lorenzo Unified.
ShowHide table 01 — Score factors
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 46.3% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 73.0% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8) | Strong | average | 20% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 4.2% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.5% | 3.6% | 5% |
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 17.2% · index 83 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 40.0% · index 77 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Growth (2023 G6 → 2025 G8)
- ↑ vs CA average · ≈93rd calibrated reference pctile
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↑ vs CA 18.1% · index 70 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 3.6pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 3.6% · index 59 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.5pp lower vs 2024
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2024–25 results by grade
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 108 | 52% | 31% | 10% | 6% | 83% | +36 |
| Grade 6 | 107 | 43% | 33% | 14% | 10% | 76% | +30 |
| Grade 7 | 101 | 63% | 29% | 5% | 3% | 92% | +44 |
| Grade 8 | 105 | 46% | 36% | 11% | 7% | 82% | +36 |
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools
State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4084 reporting schools
State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2631 reporting schools
State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 46.2%; n=2658 reporting schools
Math · 2024–25 results by grade
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 108 | 53% | 20% | 18% | 9% | 73% | +38 |
| Grade 6 | 107 | 52% | 16% | 19% | 13% | 68% | +34 |
| Grade 7 | 102 | 34% | 27% | 25% | 13% | 62% | +28 |
| Grade 8 | 105 | 39% | 19% | 21% | 21% | 58% | +26 |
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools
State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.5%; n=4086 reporting schools
State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 33.7%; n=2630 reporting schools
State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 32.1%; n=2658 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
| Year · grade · subject | Students with scores | Met+ |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 · Grade 5 · ELA | 108 | 73.2% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · ELA | 103 | 76.7% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · ELA | 105 | 80.0% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · ELA | 102 | 76.5% |
| 2024 · Grade 5 · Math | 108 | 66.7% |
| 2024 · Grade 6 · Math | 103 | 63.1% |
| 2024 · Grade 7 · Math | 105 | 53.3% |
| 2024 · Grade 8 · Math | 102 | 56.9% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · ELA | 102 | 66.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · ELA | 103 | 64.1% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · ELA | 103 | 75.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · ELA | 99 | 67.7% |
| 2023 · Grade 5 · Math | 102 | 52.0% |
| 2023 · Grade 6 · Math | 103 | 49.5% |
| 2023 · Grade 7 · Math | 104 | 51.9% |
| 2023 · Grade 8 · Math | 100 | 48.0% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · ELA | 420 | 54.6% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · ELA | 420 | 71.4% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · ELA | 420 | 75.7% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · ELA | 420 | 70.2% |
| 2022 · Grade 5 · Math | 420 | 39.8% |
| 2022 · Grade 6 · Math | 420 | 42.9% |
| 2022 · Grade 7 · Math | 420 | 48.5% |
| 2022 · Grade 8 · Math | 420 | 47.1% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · ELA | 410 | 60.2% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · ELA | 410 | 47.6% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · ELA | 410 | 83.0% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · ELA | 410 | 85.4% |
| 2019 · Grade 5 · Math | 411 | 46.1% |
| 2019 · Grade 6 · Math | 411 | 40.0% |
| 2019 · Grade 7 · Math | 411 | 56.6% |
| 2019 · Grade 8 · Math | 411 | 72.9% |
Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 213 | 39% | 28% | 31% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 324 | 81.1% | +57 | +43 |
| Asian | 223 | 91.9% | +41 | +16 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 156 | 68.6% | +45 | +30 |
ShowHide table 03 — Nearest middle schools
| School | Dist | Scope · percentile · band | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIPP Summit Academy ← | — | 7796th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025 | 46.3% | 73.0% | −2.0pp | +63 pts | 1.5% |
| Washington Manor Middle | 1 mi | 3342nd percentile · Developing · statewide · 2025 | 12.3% | 32.0% | +3.0pp | — | 3.7% |
| Bohannon Middle | 1.2 mi | 2626th percentile · Developing · statewide · 2025 | 7.5% | 28.2% | −8.1pp | — | 6.8% |
| Edendale Middle | 2.2 mi | 111st percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 2025 | 2.3% | 9.9% | −7.5pp | — | 3.4% |
| California average | — | 39School average · no percentile | 17.2% | 40.0% | +1.5pp | — | 3.6% |
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
Additional workforce records
CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.
CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
| Assessment year | Scope Score | Percentile | Rank | Comparison group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 62/100 | 87 | #241 | California comprehensive middle schools · 1,953 schools |
| 2022 | 60/100 | 87 | #268 | California comprehensive middle schools · 2,113 schools |
| 2023 | 61/100 | 88 | #239 | California comprehensive middle schools · 2,125 schools |
| 2024 | 71/100 | 94 | #126 | California comprehensive middle schools · 2,152 schools |
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.
| Year-over-year school rates |
|---|
| Chronic absenteeism2024 · 7.2% → 2025 · 3.5% · −3.7pp |
| Suspension rate2024 · 3.0% → 2025 · 1.4% · −1.6pp |
ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades
| Year · subject | Students with scores | Exc | Met+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · ELA | 421 | 50.8% | 83.1% |
| 2025 · Math | 422 | 44.8% | 65.4% |
| 2024 · ELA | 418 | 46.6% | 76.6% |
| 2024 · Math | 418 | 40.2% | 60.0% |
| 2023 · ELA | 407 | 36.4% | 68.5% |
| 2023 · Math | 409 | 27.9% | 50.4% |
| 2022 · ELA | 420 | 33.6% | 67.9% |
| 2022 · Math | 420 | 23.3% | 44.5% |
| 2019 · ELA | 410 | 35.1% | 68.8% |
| 2019 · Math | 411 | 31.1% | 53.5% |
Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | — | — | 34.6% | 64.3% | 4.5% | 4.6% | +35.4pp |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 30.9% | 59.3% | 16.3% | 3.9% | +1.5pp |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 32.4% | 59.5% | 9.0% | 3.8% | +1.1pp |
| 2024 | — | — | — | 41.8% | 67.8% | 7.8% | 3.0% | -3.2pp |
| 2025 | 77 | 96 | #84 | 46.3% | 73.0% | 4.2% | 1.5% | -2.0pp |
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2018–19 | 2024–25 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | — | 3.3% | — |
| Male | — | 3.7% | — |
| Asian | — | 2.2% | — |
| Black/African American | — | 7.7% | — |
| Filipino | — | 0.0% | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | — | 5.0% | — |
| Students with Disabilities | — | 6.7% | — |
| English Learners | — | 4.0% | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | — | 3.7% | — |
| All Students | — | 3.5% | — |
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | ELA | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +33 | 414 | Exceptional | +21 | 414 | Exceptional |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | +32 | 321 | Exceptional | +21 | 321 | Exceptional |
| English Learner | +34 | 229 | Exceptional | +20 | 229 | Exceptional |
| Asian | +38 | 219 | Exceptional | +28 | 219 | Exceptional |
| Hispanic or Latino | +33 | 154 | Exceptional | +14 | 154 | Accelerated |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | +36 | 154 | not categorised | +21 | 154 | not categorised |
| English Only | +36 | 83 | not categorised | +18 | 83 | not categorised |
| English Learners Only | +28 | 75 | not categorised | +21 | 75 | not categorised |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | +37 | 53 | Exceptional | −1 | 53 | Average |
| Students with Disabilities | +7 | 40 | Accelerated | −15 | 40 | Moderate |
| Filipino | +41 | 14 | Exceptional | +25 | 14 | Exceptional |
| Black or African American | +38 | 12 | Exceptional | +9 | 12 | Accelerated |
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
ShowHide table 07 — Growth source detail
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 103 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
414 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
414 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −1 and the middle half fall between −8 and +6 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
ShowHide table 08 — Funding source detail
Per-pupil spending
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 9,431 pupils
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
| Measure | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $110,729 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+) | 26.06% |
| ZCTA population | 29,420 |
| Median age | 41.9 years |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/kipp-summit-academy-1212"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="KIPP Summit Academy — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction