ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Bancroft Middle · San Leandro

Bancroft Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Bancroft posts 28% meeting the standard and 11.3% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1150 Bancroft Avenue, 94577 (opens in new tab)·San Leandro Unified·San Leandro·Grades 6-8·948 students·79% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 618-4380·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3443
% Exceeded11%17%
% Met+28%39%
Growth-13.1+1.5
Absence15.7%18.5%
Suspension8.3%3.7%
Scope Score
34
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,500 statewide · #2 of 3 in San Leandro Unified

Bancroft Middle scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 33rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “28% proficient” and call it done. Bancroft deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Leandro, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 33rd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 28% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 629%30%24%38%43%
Grade 735%33%29%28%37%
Grade 840%22%30%30%32%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 621%19%12%21%25%
Grade 718%21%18%14%23%
Grade 818%9%17%9%10%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
27%
57%
Grade 6 · 43% proficient
13%
24%
63%
Grade 7 · 37% proficient
9%
23%
68%
Grade 8 · 32% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 6.6pp across grades; the floor slips 11.2pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
11.3%
State 16.8%
5.5pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-13.1pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
28.5%
State 39.3%
10.8pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
15.7%
State 18.5%
2.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
8.3%
State 3.7%
4.7pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
25.0%
State 18.0%
7.0pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Bancroft Middle in San Leandro, 29.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bancroft Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 723 students tested.

All students at this school: 29% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 29%, district —, state 39%29%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 21%, district 27%, state 32%21% · −8 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 21%, district 23%, state 32%21% · −8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 26%, district 32%, state 42%26% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 31%, district 34%, state 44%31% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 10%, state 11%5% · −24 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 14%, district 19%, state 26%14% · −15 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 11%, state 15%7% · −22 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 46%, district 58%, state 72%46% · +18 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 61%, district 53%, state 56%61% · +33 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 50%, district 40%, state 56%50% · +21 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 59%, district 43%, state 65%59% · +30 vs school
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 6.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -4.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 15.7%, district 24.7%, state 18.5%15.7% · −2.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 8.3%, district —, state 3.7%8.3% · +4.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.0%
Grades 7–815.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 22:123:1
Teaching staff46 teachers
Avg. experience9.8 years
Fully credentialed70%
First-year teachers2%
Intern / emergency permit3.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$89,138 – $159,691
Principal salary$189,856 – $233,618
Superintendent salary$390,352

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,973, CA average $14,815$19,973 · spent at this school
Federal share$456 per student

$456 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,588 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support10%
Student services8%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,807 per pupil
2019$12,753 per pupil
2018$12,979 per pupil
2017$12,258 per pupil
2016$11,661 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic56.8%
District 49.4% · CA 56.1%
Black13.7%
District 10.4% · CA 4.8%
Other11.9%
District 14.5% · CA 9.0%
Asian9.3%
District 18.9% · CA 10.2%
White8.3%
District 6.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 79.0% (15pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$109K · CA $85K
Median home value$856K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+39% · CA 35%
ZIP population46,317
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 20% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bancroft Middle a good middle school?

Bancroft Middle has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 33rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,500 statewide. 11.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.5 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Bancroft Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 28.5% of students at Bancroft Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,830 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Bancroft Middle rank in California?

Bancroft Middle ranks #1,500 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 33rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Bancroft Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Bancroft Middle decreases by 13.1 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Bancroft Middle?

15.7% of students at Bancroft Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 8.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Bancroft Middle compare to other schools in San Leandro?

Bancroft Middle scores 34/100 (33rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 948 students. Use the schools in San Leandro page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Bancroft Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Bancroft Middle in San Leandro, 29.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bancroft Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 4.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 723 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
11.3%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 44th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-13.1pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 42th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
28.5%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 41th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
15.7%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 54th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
8.3%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 31th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
25.0%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 55th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 632416%27%21%36%43%−3
Grade 730813%24%30%33%37%−11
Grade 82759%23%27%41%32%−14
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 632714%11%25%49%25%−10
Grade 731510%13%26%51%23%−11
Grade 82816%4%19%70%10%−22
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112785%15%59%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged72329.7%−4−8
Hispanic/Latino50729.0%−1−10
English Learners1456.9%−3−4
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Bancroft Middle ←3411.3%28.5%−13.18.3%
John Muir Middle1.5 mi4212.8%34.1%−3.53.4%
Elmhurst United Middle1.5 mi244.2%14.3%+6.113.5%
Edendale Middle2.8 mi192.3%9.9%−7.53.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193233#13388.0%26.8%13.6%12.2%+3.5pp
2022219#19596.1%22.4%34.1%8.4%-9.1pp
20233329#15457.3%21.9%23.4%11.8%+5.0pp
20242520#17746.9%23.5%20.3%10.9%-10.1pp
20253433#150011.3%28.5%15.7%8.3%-13.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female13.5%17.1%+3.6pp
Male13.6%14.4%+0.8pp
Asian1.5%4.4%+2.9pp
Black/African American15.0%19.1%+4.1pp
Filipino37.5%30.0%-7.5pp
White2.2%3.6%+1.4pp
Hispanic/Latino14.2%15.9%+1.7pp
Pacific Islander8.3%23.1%+14.8pp
Two or More Races17.3%28.3%+11.0pp
Students with Disabilities17.4%19.9%+2.5pp
English Learners12.7%13.7%+1.0pp
Homeless27.3%44.4%+17.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.7%18.3%+3.6pp
All Students13.6%15.7%+2.1pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction