ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
John Muir Middle · San Leandro

John Muir Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

John Muir posts 34% meeting the standard and 12.8% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1444 Williams Street, 94577 (opens in new tab)·San Leandro Unified·San Leandro·Grades 6-8·969 students·79% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 618-4400
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4243
% Exceeded13%17%
% Met+34%39%
Growth-3.5+1.5
Absence20.5%18.5%
Suspension3.4%3.7%
Scope Score
42
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,047 statewide · #1 of 3 in San Leandro Unified

John Muir Middle scores 42 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 53rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “34% proficient” and call it done. John Muir deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Leandro, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 43rd to the 53rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 100 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 34% meet the standard today, versus 38% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 643%33%30%40%41%
Grade 744%47%44%42%50%
Grade 847%41%51%38%41%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 630%19%18%25%27%
Grade 732%27%26%23%28%
Grade 832%24%26%18%19%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
28%
59%
Grade 6 · 41% proficient
16%
34%
50%
Grade 7 · 50% proficient
14%
27%
59%
Grade 8 · 41% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.8%
State 16.8%
4.0pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.5pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
34.1%
State 39.3%
5.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.5%
State 18.5%
1.9pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.4%
State 3.7%
0.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
20.9%
State 18.0%
3.0pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At John Muir Middle in San Leandro, 38.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Muir Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 743 students tested.

All students at this school: 34% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 34%, district —, state 39%34%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 29%, district 27%, state 32%29% · −5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 35%, district 34%, state 44%35% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 33%, district 32%, state 42%33% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 25%, district 23%, state 32%25% · −9 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 60%, district 58%, state 72%60% · +26 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 10%, state 11%5% · −30 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 11%, state 15%8% · −26 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 16%, district 19%, state 26%16% · −18 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 36%, district 43%, state 65%36% · +1 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 32%, district 40%, state 56%32% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 41%, district 53%, state 56%41% · +7 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 0.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -4.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.5%, district 24.7%, state 18.5%20.5% · +1.9pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.4%, district —, state 3.7%3.4% · −0.2pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.4%
Grades 7–821.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 22:122:1
Teaching staff50 teachers
Avg. experience14.3 years
Fully credentialed82%
First-year teachers2%
Intern / emergency permit5.5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$89,138 – $159,691
Principal salary$189,856 – $233,618
Superintendent salary$390,352

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $21,528, CA average $14,815$21,528 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,227 per student

$1,227 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,588 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support10%
Student services8%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,807 per pupil
2019$12,753 per pupil
2018$12,979 per pupil
2017$12,258 per pupil
2016$11,661 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic47.8%
District 49.4% · CA 56.1%
Asian22.5%
District 18.9% · CA 10.2%
Other14.3%
District 14.5% · CA 9.0%
Black10.5%
District 10.4% · CA 4.8%
White4.8%
District 6.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 79.4% (16pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$109K · CA $85K
Median home value$856K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+39% · CA 35%
ZIP population46,317
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 31% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is John Muir Middle a good middle school?

John Muir Middle has a Scope Score of 42 out of 100, placing it in the 53rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,047 statewide. 12.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.0 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are John Muir Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 34.1% of students at John Muir Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,865 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does John Muir Middle rank in California?

John Muir Middle ranks #1,047 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 53rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is John Muir Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at John Muir Middle decreases by 3.5 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at John Muir Middle?

20.5% of students at John Muir Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does John Muir Middle compare to other schools in San Leandro?

John Muir Middle scores 42/100 (53rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 969 students. Use the schools in San Leandro page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does John Muir Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At John Muir Middle in San Leandro, 38.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. John Muir Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (36.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 743 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
12.8%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 46th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.5pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 59th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
34.1%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 46th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.5%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.4%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 51th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
20.9%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 50th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 632813%28%26%34%41%−6
Grade 730916%34%21%29%50%+2
Grade 828714%27%30%29%41%−5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 633810%17%25%49%27%−8
Grade 731414%14%29%43%28%−6
Grade 828911%8%25%56%19%−13
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112909%22%55%14%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged74338.9%+5+1
Hispanic/Latino43936.7%+6−2
Asian21568.4%+7−6
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
John Muir Middle ←4212.8%34.1%−3.53.4%
KIPP Summit Academy2.9 mi7746.3%73.0%−2.01.5%
Washington Manor Middle2.1 mi3812.3%32.0%+3.03.7%
Bancroft Middle1.5 mi3411.3%28.5%−13.18.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193643#114711.8%38.2%10.0%8.0%+3.4pp
20223444#120610.5%31.9%41.1%12.2%+6.5pp
20234662#8308.8%32.5%23.3%10.0%+14.6pp
20243645#12139.8%30.9%19.7%6.8%-4.1pp
20254253#104712.8%34.1%20.5%3.4%-3.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.2%22.1%+13.9pp
Male11.8%19.0%+7.2pp
Asian1.3%4.7%+3.4pp
Black/African American20.2%26.4%+6.2pp
White3.8%11.1%+7.3pp
Hispanic/Latino12.0%26.5%+14.5pp
Pacific Islander16.0%
Two or More Races5.1%29.2%+24.1pp
Students with Disabilities20.6%33.0%+12.4pp
English Learners13.2%20.6%+7.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.5%22.1%+10.6pp
All Students10.0%20.5%+10.5pp
Filipino25.0%
Homeless45.5%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction