Summerville High: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.
Summerville posts 50% meeting the standard, and 18.1% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 46 | 18% | 50% | 94.2% | 20.0% | 23.3% | 6.8% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Summerville High scores 46 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 53rd percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “50% proficient” and call it done. Summerville deserves a closer read. The school sits in Tuolumne, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Summerville's low-income kids hit 60.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 53rd percentile since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 50% of students meet the standard today, above the 42% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 58% | 56% | 58% | 62% | 71% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 27% | 24% | 22% | 34% | 29% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 50 are proficient by 11th grade → 94 graduate → 20 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
Summerville's most underrated number
60.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Summerville High in Tuolumne, 60.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 59.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Summerville High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (25.0% Math proficient); White students (71.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 10.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 56 students tested.
5 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$285 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 508 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 26% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Summerville High a good high school?
What are Summerville High's CAASPP test scores?
How does Summerville High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Summerville High?
How does Summerville High compare to other schools in Tuolumne?
How does Summerville High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 35
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 127 | 30% | 41% | 21% | 8% | 71% | +24 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 127 | 6% | 23% | 31% | 40% | 29% | +6 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 130 | 5% | 22% | 68% | 6% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 56 | 60.7% | +1 | +22 |
| White | 87 | 71.3% | −0 | +9 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 30 | 80.0% | +2 | +41 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summerville High ← | — | 46 | 18.1% | 50.0% | — | 6.8% |
| Connections Visual and Performing Arts Academy | 0 mi | 59 | 38.0% | 62.0% | — | 4.4% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 46 | 47 | #1082 | 13.3% | 42.5% | 3.7% | 10.6% | — |
| 2022 | 42 | 46 | #1126 | 12.7% | 39.8% | 31.9% | 8.0% | — |
| 2023 | 45 | 54 | #992 | 17.1% | 40.2% | 25.6% | 3.8% | — |
| 2024 | 46 | 57 | #916 | 16.5% | 47.9% | 24.4% | 3.9% | — |
| 2025 | 46 | 53 | #1006 | 18.1% | 50.0% | 23.3% | 6.8% | — |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0.0% | 26.7% | +26.7pp |
| Male | 0.0% | 18.3% | +18.3pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 0.0% | 19.3% | +19.3pp |
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 0.0% | — | — |
| Two or More Races | 0.0% | 19.2% | +19.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 0.0% | 34.0% | +34.0pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0.0% | 30.4% | +30.4pp |
| All Students | 0.0% | 22.3% | +22.3pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction