ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Vista Heights Middle · Moreno Valley

Vista Heights Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Vista Heights posts 32% meeting the standard and 11.0% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

23049 Old Lake Drive, 92557 (opens in new tab)·Moreno Valley Unified·Moreno Valley·Grades 6-8·1,419 students·80% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 571-4300·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3443
% Exceeded11%17%
% Met+32%39%
Growth-3.8+1.5
Absence21.9%18.5%
Suspension2.6%3.7%
Scope Score
34
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,492 statewide · #2 of 8 in Moreno Valley Unified

Vista Heights Middle scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 33rd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Vista Heights deserves a closer read. The school sits in Moreno Valley, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 24th to the 33rd percentile of California middle schools since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 32% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 640%36%33%36%38%
Grade 739%40%46%39%45%
Grade 837%39%36%41%39%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 635%26%24%27%27%
Grade 726%19%24%20%22%
Grade 829%19%16%21%19%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
25%
62%
Grade 6 · 38% proficient
13%
32%
55%
Grade 7 · 45% proficient
9%
29%
62%
Grade 8 · 38% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.8pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
11.0%
State 16.8%
5.8pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.8pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
31.8%
State 39.3%
7.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
21.9%
State 18.5%
3.3pp above state avg
Suspension rate
2.6%
State 3.7%
1.0pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
18.1%
State 18.0%
0.1pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Vista Heights Middle in Moreno Valley, 38.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Vista Heights Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 1,132 students tested.

All students at this school: 32% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 32%, district —, state 39%32%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 25%, state 32%30% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 32%, district 27%, state 32%32% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 32%, district 28%, state 44%32% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 31%, district 27%, state 42%31% · −1 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 24%, district 19%, state 26%24% · −8 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 7%, state 15%9% · −22 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 6%, state 11%3% · −29 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 34%, district 39%, state 56%34% · +3 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 28%, district 28%, state 56%28% · −4 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 50%, district 49%, state 72%50% · +18 vs school

6 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +0.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 21.9%, district 27.3%, state 18.5%21.9% · +3.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.6%, district —, state 3.7%2.6% · −1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–621.3%
Grades 7–822.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Canyon Springs HighScope 46direct feeder

The road from this school ends at Canyon Springs High, which sent 43 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 19 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Canyon Springs High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 50% of Canyon Springs High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

43 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 19 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Canyon Springs High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff66 teachers
Avg. experience12.7 years
Fully credentialed65%
First-year teachers8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,982 – $136,195
Principal salary$171,330 – $199,489
Superintendent salary$356,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $19,852, CA average $14,491$19,852 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,572 per student

$1,572 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,463 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction66%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration3%
Buildings & maintenance12%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,975 per pupil
2019$14,628 per pupil
2018$14,013 per pupil
2017$12,732 per pupil
2016$12,346 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic70.8%
District 75.2% · CA 56.1%
Black12.9%
District 11.7% · CA 4.8%
White7.6%
District 5.3% · CA 19.9%
Other6.2%
District 5.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian2.5%
District 2.0% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 80.3% (17pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$95K · CA $85K
Median home value$525K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+20% · CA 35%
ZIP population54,061
Median age34 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,419 students, this school is well above the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 20% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Vista Heights Middle a good middle school?

Vista Heights Middle has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 33rd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,492 statewide. 11.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.8 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Vista Heights Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 31.8% of students at Vista Heights Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,789 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Vista Heights Middle rank in California?

Vista Heights Middle ranks #1,492 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 33rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Vista Heights Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Vista Heights Middle decreases by 3.8 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Vista Heights Middle?

21.9% of students at Vista Heights Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Vista Heights Middle compare to other schools in Moreno Valley?

Vista Heights Middle scores 34/100 (33rd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,419 students. Use the schools in Moreno Valley page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Vista Heights Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Vista Heights Middle in Moreno Valley, 38.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Vista Heights Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (21.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 1,132 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
11.0%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 44th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.8pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 40th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
31.8%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 44th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
21.9%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 45th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.6%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 54th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
18.1%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 644513%25%26%36%38%−8
Grade 747413%32%27%28%45%−3
Grade 84769%29%27%34%39%−7
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 644512%16%27%46%27%−8
Grade 747410%12%26%52%22%−12
Grade 84759%10%24%57%19%−13
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/114777%13%60%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1,13238.1%+5−0
Hispanic/Latino98241.9%+7+3
Black/African American18232.4%+6−0
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Vista Heights Middle ←3411.0%31.8%−3.82.6%
Sunnymead Middle2.6 mi222.8%14.8%−0.96.7%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192924#152810.1%34.2%13.7%15.9%-4.6pp
20222929#15458.4%30.0%33.7%9.7%-2.4pp
20233331#150310.3%30.0%27.4%13.0%-2.9pp
20243337#139810.3%30.8%20.9%7.7%-0.5pp
20253433#149211.0%31.8%21.9%2.6%-3.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female13.3%21.8%+8.5pp
Male14.2%22.1%+7.9pp
Asian13.8%7.9%-5.9pp
Black/African American18.7%26.1%+7.4pp
White0.0%5.0%+5.0pp
Hispanic/Latino12.2%21.7%+9.5pp
Two or More Races20.3%30.0%+9.7pp
Students with Disabilities21.1%32.2%+11.1pp
English Learners13.9%25.8%+11.9pp
Foster Youth12.5%
Homeless20.7%46.9%+26.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.0%23.2%+9.2pp
All Students13.7%21.9%+8.2pp
Filipino5.6%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction