ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Badger Springs Middle · Moreno Valley

Badger Springs Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Badger Springs posts low test scores — and attendance holds near the state average — families haven't checked out. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

24750 Delphinium Avenue, 92553 (opens in new tab)·Moreno Valley Unified·Moreno Valley·Grades 6-8·1,058 students·95% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 571-4200·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3043
% Exceeded5%17%
% Met+20%39%
Growth-0.1+1.5
Absence20.1%18.5%
Suspension3.7%3.7%
Scope Score
30
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #1,744 statewide · #4 of 8 in Moreno Valley Unified

Badger Springs Middle scores 30 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 22nd percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “20% proficient” and call it done. Badger Springs deserves a closer read. The school sits in Moreno Valley, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 7th to the 22nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 100 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined)MathGreen(Increased)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 20% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 629%21%21%22%28%
Grade 729%26%23%27%23%
Grade 825%28%26%25%30%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 615%11%13%12%14%
Grade 714%11%12%15%13%
Grade 811%9%9%12%11%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
73%
Grade 6 · 27% proficient
18%
77%
Grade 7 · 23% proficient
8%
22%
70%
Grade 8 · 30% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
5.0%
State 16.8%
11.8pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-0.1pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
19.7%
State 39.3%
19.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.1%
State 18.5%
1.6pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.7%
State 3.7%
0.0pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
18.4%
State 18.0%
0.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Badger Springs Middle in Moreno Valley, 26.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Badger Springs Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 6.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (27.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 958 students tested.

All students at this school: 20% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 20%, district —, state 39%20%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 19%, district 25%, state 32%19% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 20%, district 27%, state 32%20% · +0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 20%, district 27%, state 42%20% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 19%, district 28%, state 44%19% · −0 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 1%, district 6%, state 11%1% · −19 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 7%, state 15%5% · −15 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 9%, district 19%, state 26%9% · −10 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 27%, district 39%, state 56%27% · +7 vs school

8 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 2.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +0.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.1%, district 27.3%, state 18.5%20.1% · +1.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.7%, district —, state 3.7%3.7% · +0.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–618.9%
Grades 7–820.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

Moreno Valley HighScope 43direct feeder

The road from this school ends at Moreno Valley High, which sent 49 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 22 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Moreno Valley High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 53% of Moreno Valley High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

49 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 22 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Moreno Valley High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff53 teachers
Avg. experience10.5 years
Fully credentialed89%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$67,982 – $136,195
Principal salary$171,330 – $199,489
Superintendent salary$356,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,242, CA average $14,491$20,242 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,226 per student

$1,226 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,463 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction66%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration3%
Buildings & maintenance12%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,975 per pupil
2019$14,628 per pupil
2018$14,013 per pupil
2017$12,732 per pupil
2016$12,346 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic84.2%
District 75.2% · CA 56.1%
Black8.8%
District 11.7% · CA 4.8%
Other3.5%
District 5.8% · CA 9.0%
White2.8%
District 5.3% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.7%
District 2.0% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 94.5% (31pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$78K · CA $85K
Median home value$453K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+14% · CA 35%
ZIP population74,640
Median age31 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Badger Springs Middle a good middle school?

Badger Springs Middle has a Scope Score of 30 out of 100, placing it in the 22nd percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,744 statewide. 5.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 11.8 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Badger Springs Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 19.7% of students at Badger Springs Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 5.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 5.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,036 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Badger Springs Middle rank in California?

Badger Springs Middle ranks #1,744 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 22nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Badger Springs Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Badger Springs Middle decreases by 0.1 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Badger Springs Middle?

20.1% of students at Badger Springs Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 3.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Badger Springs Middle compare to other schools in Moreno Valley?

Badger Springs Middle scores 30/100 (22nd percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,058 students. Use the schools in Moreno Valley page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Badger Springs Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Badger Springs Middle in Moreno Valley, 26.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Badger Springs Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 6.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (12.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (27.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.2 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 958 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
5.0%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 37th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-0.1pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
19.7%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 34th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.1%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 48th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
3.7%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 50th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
18.4%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 63197%20%28%44%28%−19
Grade 73665%18%23%54%23%−24
Grade 83278%22%24%46%30%−16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 63233%10%24%62%14%−21
Grade 73683%10%20%67%13%−21
Grade 83333%8%18%71%11%−21
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/113312%13%57%27%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged95826.3%−7−12
Hispanic/Latino85627.5%−7−11
English Learners1760.6%−7−10
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Badger Springs Middle ←305.0%19.7%−0.13.7%
Vista Verde Middle2.1 mi3411.4%30.9%+0.02.3%
March Middle1.1 mi316.2%22.4%+3.12.3%
Mountain View Middle2.4 mi298.8%27.1%−7.26.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019217#18573.4%20.5%18.3%11.9%-4.8pp
20222313#18733.1%17.5%36.1%15.3%+2.6pp
20232814#18674.4%17.3%33.0%14.2%+0.4pp
20242622#17294.5%18.9%22.3%6.0%+1.4pp
20253022#17445.0%19.7%20.1%3.7%-0.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female18.4%19.7%+1.3pp
Male18.3%20.5%+2.2pp
Black/African American33.3%41.3%+8.0pp
Hispanic/Latino16.0%17.8%+1.8pp
Two or More Races34.6%23.5%-11.1pp
Students with Disabilities25.4%23.8%-1.6pp
English Learners11.3%14.9%+3.6pp
Foster Youth33.3%
Homeless22.6%34.5%+11.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18.1%20.0%+1.9pp
All Students18.3%20.1%+1.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction