ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Westside Preparatory Charter · Rio LindaCharter

Westside Preparatory Charter: The state doesn't publish enough data to score this school fairly.

Westside Preparatory Charter is a middle school in Rio Linda. The state doesn't publish enough data to score it fairly — so we won't. Here's what we can show.

Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more

No Scope Score available

California doesn't publicly report per-grade test results when fewer than 11 students are tested in a grade — a privacy protection for small schools. We can't compute a Scope Score without that data.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits about at the middle of California middle schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 49th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.49th pctile · +1 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +3 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 57th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.57th pctile · +3 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

With little published data, a visit does the heavy lifting: ask about class sizes, teacher tenure, and where last year's students went next.

  • Ask about typical class sizes and the student-teacher ratio.
  • Ask how long teachers have stayed at the school.
  • Ask where recent graduates or transfers went next.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom, and watch how a lesson actually runs.

How every group of students does here

At Westside Preparatory Charter in Rio Linda, 47.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Westside Preparatory Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (49.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 42.6 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 389 students tested.

All students at this school: 43% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 43%, district —, state 39%43%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 39%, district 30%, state 32%39% · −4 vs school
MaleMale: this school 39%, district 30%, state 42%39% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 48%, district 33%, state 44%48% · +4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 40%, district 30%, state 32%40% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 50%, district 39%, state 56%50% · +7 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 11%, district 13%, state 11%11% · −32 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 29%, district 22%, state 26%29% · −14 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 41%, district 33%, state 56%41% · −2 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 10%, state 15%8% · −35 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 48%, district 33%, state 72%48% · +5 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 28%, district 23%, state 22%28% · −15 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students370 studentsLow-income students, reading: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 370 students.−1 pts · +2 vs typical
English Only271 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +4 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 271 students.+4 pts · +4 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students189 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +3 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 189 students.+3 pts · +5 vs typical
English Learner128 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 128 students.−8 pts · −3 vs typical
White109 studentsWhite, reading: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 109 students.−4 pts · −4 vs typical
Math
Low-income students370 studentsLow-income students, math: +2 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 370 students.+2 pts · +7 vs typical
English Only271 studentsEnglish Only, math: +1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 271 students.+1 pts · +4 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students189 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 189 students.0 pts · +6 vs typical
English Learner128 studentsEnglish Learner, math: +4 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 128 students.+4 pts · +7 vs typical
White109 studentsWhite, math: +12 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 109 students.+12 pts · +11 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 2 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Middle
Westside Preparatory CharterCharter
No score
This school
High School

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Rio Linda HighScope 52estimated path

The road from this school ends at Rio Linda High, which sent 20 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 19 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Rio Linda High around 2031, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 57% of Rio Linda High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

20 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 19 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Rio Linda High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 23:121:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience22.0 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$63,947 – $124,659
Principal salary$147,324 – $164,332
Superintendent salary$378,049

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,341, CA average $14,491$18,341 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$147 per student

$147 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,643 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction54%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,626 per pupil
2019$14,054 per pupil
2018$14,648 per pupil
2017$12,954 per pupil
2016$12,405 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic41.5%
District 41.8% · CA 56.1%
White24.8%
District 23.8% · CA 19.9%
Other13.5%
District 11.0% · CA 9.0%
Black11.5%
District 10.7% · CA 4.8%
Asian8.8%
District 12.7% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 81.0% (17pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$96K · CA $85K
Median home value$459K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+16% · CA 35%
ZIP population16,512
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction