ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Mills Middle · Rancho Cordova

Mills Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Mills posts low test scores — and grade 8 tests above grade 6 here this year, by 11.7pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

10439 Coloma Road, 95670 (opens in new tab)·Folsom-Cordova Unified·Rancho Cordova·Grades 6-8·886 students·83% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 294-9045·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2643
% Exceeded4%17%
% Met+18%39%
Growth+11.7+1.5
Absence19.7%18.5%
Suspension12.4%3.7%
Scope Score
26
📈 On the Rise · Needs Support
ranked #1,956 statewide · #5 of 6 in Folsom-Cordova Unified

Mills Middle scores 26 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 13th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “18% proficient” and call it done. Mills deserves a closer read. The school sits in Rancho Cordova, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 23rd to the 13th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 18% meet the standard today, versus 24% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 629%26%22%21%15%
Grade 727%27%24%25%25%
Grade 831%39%25%24%31%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 620%13%16%10%5%
Grade 718%11%13%14%16%
Grade 820%17%11%12%13%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

13%
85%
Grade 6 · 15% proficient
17%
76%
Grade 7 · 24% proficient
25%
69%
Grade 8 · 31% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
4.3%
State 16.8%
12.6pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+11.7pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
17.7%
State 39.3%
21.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
19.7%
State 18.5%
1.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
12.4%
State 3.7%
8.8pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
16.7%
State 18.0%
1.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Mills Middle in Rancho Cordova, 21.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Mills Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 12.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (10.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 22.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 674 students tested.

All students at this school: 18% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 18%, district —, state 39%18%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 16%, district 28%, state 32%16% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 15%, district 54%, state 42%15% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 21%, district 55%, state 44%21% · +3 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 13%, district 34%, state 32%13% · −4 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 12%, state 11%3% · −15 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 27%, district 57%, state 56%27% · +10 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 2%, district 20%, state 15%2% · −15 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 20%, district 52%, state 56%20% · +3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 21%, district 78%, state 72%21% · +3 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 8%, district 21%, state 26%8% · −9 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 11%, district 19%, state 22%11% · −7 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 13.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +10.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.7%, district 15.8%, state 18.5%19.7% · +1.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 12.4%, district —, state 3.7%12.4% · +8.8pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–619.5%
Grades 7–819.8%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 22:121:1
Teaching staff43 teachers
Avg. experience10.1 years
Fully credentialed88%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$49,961 – $122,883
Principal salary$157,609 – $181,584
Superintendent salary$315,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $16,792, CA average $14,815$16,792 · spent at this school
Federal share$640 per student

$640 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$16,736 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction58%
Instruction support12%
Student services11%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,926 per pupil
2019$11,349 per pupil
2018$11,775 per pupil
2017$11,233 per pupil
2016$10,964 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic44.9%
District 23.4% · CA 56.1%
White20.1%
District 35.1% · CA 19.9%
Other14.6%
District 15.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian11.2%
District 22.2% · CA 10.2%
Black9.3%
District 4.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 82.8% (19pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$89K · CA $85K
Median home value$491K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+33% · CA 35%
ZIP population58,819
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Mills Middle a good middle school?

Mills Middle has a Scope Score of 26 out of 100, placing it in the 13th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,956 statewide. 4.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.6 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Mills Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 17.7% of students at Mills Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 4.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 13.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 4.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,664 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Mills Middle rank in California?

Mills Middle ranks #1,956 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 13th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Mills Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Mills Middle increases by 11.7 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Mills Middle?

19.7% of students at Mills Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 12.4%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Mills Middle compare to other schools in Rancho Cordova?

Mills Middle scores 26/100 (13th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 886 students. Use the schools in Rancho Cordova page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Mills Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Mills Middle in Rancho Cordova, 21.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Mills Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 12.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (10.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (19.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 22.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 674 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
4.3%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 36th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
+11.7pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp · 44th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
17.7%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 33th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
19.7%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 48th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
12.4%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 15th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
16.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62602%13%19%65%15%−31
Grade 72707%17%28%47%25%−23
Grade 82826%25%30%39%31%−15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 62732%3%17%77%5%−30
Grade 72814%12%26%58%16%−18
Grade 82984%9%21%65%13%−19
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/112954%12%62%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged67421.1%−13−17
Hispanic/Latino37319.3%−22−20
English Learners2601.5%−11−9
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Mills Middle ←264.3%17.7%+11.712.4%
W. E. Mitchell Middle1.9 mi369.5%29.0%+6.713.1%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192923#15418.0%24.1%16.9%14.1%+0.8pp
20223237#13645.0%22.2%31.8%12.3%+8.7pp
20232714#18804.6%18.6%20.2%11.6%-0.9pp
20242518#18094.2%17.7%16.2%12.1%+3.0pp
20252613#19564.3%17.7%19.7%12.4%+11.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 17 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female15.3%19.2%+3.9pp
Male18.3%20.1%+1.8pp
Asian3.6%9.3%+5.7pp
Black/African American30.2%37.2%+7.0pp
White7.1%
Hispanic/Latino15.2%21.2%+6.0pp
Pacific Islander12.5%9.1%-3.4pp
Two or More Races21.1%21.1%+0.0pp
Students with Disabilities22.2%29.6%+7.4pp
English Learners8.8%12.2%+3.4pp
Homeless34.4%42.5%+8.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged18.3%20.5%+2.2pp
All Students16.9%19.7%+2.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction