ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Winston Churchill Middle · Carmichael

Winston Churchill Middle: Two in five kids exceed the standard. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.

Winston Churchill is one of the strongest middle schools in Carmichael by raw achievement. The catch worth understanding: the cohort doesn't gain ground year-over-year.

4900 Whitney Avenue, 95608 (opens in new tab)·San Juan Unified·Carmichael·Grades 6-8·987 students·43% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(916) 971-7324·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5543
% Exceeded41%17%
% Met+62%39%
Growth-18.0+1.5
Absence16.8%18.5%
Suspension6.3%3.7%
Scope Score
55
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #438 statewide · #1 of 24 in San Juan Unified

Winston Churchill Middle scores 55 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 80th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “62% proficient” and call it done. Winston Churchill deserves a closer read. The school sits in Carmichael, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 40.9% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 16.8%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 80th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 62% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 670%60%63%75%73%
Grade 768%62%57%55%69%
Grade 861%62%59%57%57%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 661%55%52%64%67%
Grade 759%55%49%47%58%
Grade 856%55%48%49%47%

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
40.9%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 16.8%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 6→8
18.0pp

proficiency runs 70% in this year's grade 6 against 52% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

45%
28%
27%
Grade 6 · 73% proficient
42%
26%
32%
Grade 7 · 68% proficient
30%
27%
43%
Grade 8 · 57% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 15.1pp across grades; the floor slips 16.3pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
40.9%
State 16.8%
24.1pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-18.0pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
61.8%
State 39.3%
22.6pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
16.8%
State 18.5%
1.7pp below state avg
Suspension rate
6.3%
State 3.7%
2.6pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
10.5%
State 18.0%
7.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Winston Churchill Middle in Carmichael, 44.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Winston Churchill Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 15.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.3% Math proficient); White students (63.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 61.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 443 students tested.

All students at this school: 61% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 61%, district —, state 39%61%
FemaleFemale: this school 63%, district 35%, state 44%63% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 60%, district 33%, state 42%60% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 39%, district 24%, state 32%39% · −22 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 60%, district 41%, state 56%60% · −1 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 77%, district 25%, state 72%77% · +15 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 43%, district 28%, state 32%43% · −19 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 3%, district 6%, state 11%3% · −58 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 70%, district 41%, state 56%70% · +9 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 18%, district 13%, state 15%18% · −43 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 30%, district 15%, state 26%30% · −31 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 16%, district 13%, state 22%16% · −45 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 18.1pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -3.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 16.8%, district 23.7%, state 18.5%16.8% · −1.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 6.3%, district —, state 3.7%6.3% · +2.6pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.3%
Grades 7–818.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff42 teachers
Avg. experience15.1 years
Fully credentialed78%
First-year teachers12%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,000 – $118,000
Principal salary$153,210 – $185,821
Superintendent salary$392,080

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,046, CA average $14,815$18,046 · spent at this school
Federal share$319 per student

$319 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,542 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support16%
Student services8%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,962 per pupil
2019$12,705 per pupil
2018$13,148 per pupil
2017$11,096 per pupil
2016$10,446 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White38.9%
District 45.5% · CA 19.9%
Asian25.9%
District 11.7% · CA 10.2%
Hispanic18.2%
District 26.4% · CA 56.1%
Other11.7%
District 10.5% · CA 9.0%
Black5.3%
District 5.9% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 43.1% (21pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$87K · CA $85K
Median home value$599K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population61,440
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 49% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Winston Churchill Middle a good middle school?

Winston Churchill Middle has a Scope Score of 55 out of 100, placing it in the 80th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #438 statewide. 40.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 24.1 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Winston Churchill Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 61.8% of students at Winston Churchill Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 40.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 40.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,953 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Winston Churchill Middle rank in California?

Winston Churchill Middle ranks #438 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 80th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Winston Churchill Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Winston Churchill Middle decreases by 18.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Winston Churchill Middle?

16.8% of students at Winston Churchill Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 6.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Winston Churchill Middle compare to other schools in Carmichael?

Winston Churchill Middle scores 55/100 (80th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 987 students. Use the schools in Carmichael page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Winston Churchill Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Winston Churchill Middle in Carmichael, 44.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 29.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Winston Churchill Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 15.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.3% Math proficient); White students (63.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 61.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 443 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
40.9%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 77th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-18.0pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 38th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
61.8%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 68th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
16.8%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 52th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
6.3%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 39th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
10.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 35th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 628345%28%10%17%73%+26
Grade 733042%26%8%23%69%+21
Grade 835230%27%11%32%57%+10
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 629047%20%11%22%67%+32
Grade 734244%14%15%27%58%+24
Grade 835637%11%17%35%47%+15
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1136027%22%39%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged44344.0%+15+6
White37963.6%+16+2
Asian25481.9%+53+8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Winston Churchill Middle ←5540.9%61.8%−18.06.3%
Arden Middle2.9 mi4016.8%41.8%+7.26.8%
John Barrett Middle2.2 mi3410.7%32.0%+1.19.3%
Arcade Fundamental Middle1.8 mi316.5%20.0%+2.63.0%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195783#33545.0%62.5%11.1%5.7%-6.8pp
20226088#25237.5%58.2%23.6%7.3%+1.2pp
20235782#39534.2%54.7%19.5%8.9%-3.9pp
20245683#37739.1%57.9%19.3%11.2%-16.4pp
20255580#43840.9%61.8%16.8%6.3%-18.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.3%15.9%+5.6pp
Male12.0%17.7%+5.7pp
Asian2.3%7.8%+5.5pp
Black/African American16.0%31.6%+15.6pp
White3.8%
Hispanic/Latino19.0%29.3%+10.3pp
Pacific Islander41.7%
Two or More Races4.9%13.9%+9.0pp
Students with Disabilities30.3%40.0%+9.7pp
English Learners16.8%29.5%+12.7pp
Foster Youth40.0%
Homeless26.6%49.0%+22.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged19.6%28.3%+8.7pp
All Students11.1%16.8%+5.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction