ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Manlio Silva Elementary · Stockton

Manlio Silva Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Manlio Silva posts 43% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

6250 Scott Creek Drive, 95219 (opens in new tab)·Lodi Unified·Stockton·Grades TK-6·799 students·61% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 953-9302
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3445
% Exceeded21%21%
% Met+43%43%
Growth-9.6-2.9
Absence14.9%17.9%
Suspension6.6%1.6%
Scope Score
34
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #4,271 statewide · #21 of 34 in Lodi Unified

Manlio Silva Elementary scores 34 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 26th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “43% proficient” and call it done. Manlio Silva deserves a closer read. The school sits in Stockton, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 68th to the 26th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 43% meet the standard today, versus 59% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 361%48%52%41%45%
Grade 463%49%50%47%40%
Grade 562%61%49%52%47%
Grade 654%51%40%53%46%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 363%51%57%51%53%
Grade 456%40%46%47%42%
Grade 549%47%46%37%33%
Grade 642%35%27%36%40%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

22%
23%
55%
Grade 3 · 45% proficient
19%
21%
60%
Grade 4 · 40% proficient
20%
27%
53%
Grade 5 · 47% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 2.5pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.5%
State 21.3%
0.8pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-9.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
43.5%
State 42.7%
0.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.9%
State 17.9%
3.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
6.6%
State 1.6%
5.0pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
20.2%
State 18.0%
2.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Manlio Silva Elementary in Stockton, 36.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Manlio Silva Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (33.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (38.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 304 students tested.

All students at this school: 44% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 44%, district —, state 43%44%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 35%, district 29%, state 32%35% · −8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 43%, district 32%, state 42%43% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 44%, district 35%, state 44%44% · +0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 37%, district 27%, state 32%37% · −6 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 52%, district 40%, state 72%52% · +8 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 20%, district 11%, state 15%20% · −24 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 32%, district 19%, state 26%32% · −12 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 24%, district 9%, state 11%24% · −19 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 31%, district 31%, state 46%31% · −12 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 68%, district 52%, state 65%68% · +24 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 56%, district 47%, state 56%56% · +12 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 0.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.9%, district 23.4%, state 17.9%14.9% · −3.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 6.6%, district —, state 1.6%6.6% · +5.0pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (25.7% vs 12.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.4%
TK/K25.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 26:1, district 22:126:1
Teaching staff40 teachers
Avg. experience16.1 years
Fully credentialed89%
Intern / emergency permit2.8%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$64,739 – $120,665
Principal salary$149,591 – $184,788
Superintendent salary$313,635

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $15,095, CA average $14,815$15,095 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$439 per student

$439 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,750 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,545 per pupil
2019$12,593 per pupil
2018$12,898 per pupil
2017$11,165 per pupil
2016$10,723 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic36.2%
District 48.7% · CA 56.1%
Asian24.5%
District 19.0% · CA 10.2%
Black15.6%
District 6.4% · CA 4.8%
Other15.0%
District 9.9% · CA 9.0%
White8.6%
District 15.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 61.2% (3pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$112K · CA $85K
Median home value$581K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+39% · CA 35%
ZIP population31,713
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 799 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 34% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Manlio Silva Elementary a good elementary school?

Manlio Silva Elementary has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100, placing it in the 26th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,271 statewide. 20.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Manlio Silva Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 43.5% of students at Manlio Silva Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 688 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Manlio Silva Elementary rank in California?

Manlio Silva Elementary ranks #4,271 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 26th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Manlio Silva Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Manlio Silva Elementary decreases by 9.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Manlio Silva Elementary?

14.9% of students at Manlio Silva Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 6.6%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Manlio Silva Elementary compare to other schools in Stockton?

Manlio Silva Elementary scores 34/100 (26th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 799 students. Use the schools in Stockton page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Manlio Silva Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Manlio Silva Elementary in Stockton, 36.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Manlio Silva Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (33.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (38.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 304 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.5%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 49th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-9.6pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 26th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
43.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 51th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.9%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 55th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
6.6%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 9th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
20.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 54th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312122%23%22%32%45%+2
Grade 410919%21%29%30%40%−4
Grade 511620%27%7%47%47%−1
Grade 612720%26%28%26%46%−0
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312024%29%28%19%53%+8
Grade 410715%27%31%27%42%+0
Grade 511523%10%21%46%33%−2
Grade 612726%14%17%43%40%+5
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111198%26%45%21%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged30436.8%+4−1
Hispanic/Latino17238.4%+6−0
Asian11150.5%+6−24
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Manlio Silva Elementary ←3420.5%43.5%−9.66.6%
Julia Morgan Elementary1.9 mi3916.2%40.7%−4.23.0%
Wagner-Holt Elementary2.7 mi307.1%16.8%−9.83.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195168#176129.5%58.8%9.9%3.9%-6.5pp
20224263#210525.2%49.4%33.8%5.5%+4.5pp
20234156#252624.1%49.8%24.5%5.2%-7.0pp
20243943#327321.0%45.5%18.8%2.9%-1.8pp
20253426#427120.5%43.5%14.9%6.6%-9.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.1%14.2%+5.1pp
Male10.6%15.3%+4.7pp
Asian3.2%6.9%+3.7pp
Black/African American23.9%22.7%-1.2pp
Filipino5.7%
White6.5%7.9%+1.4pp
Hispanic/Latino9.8%16.1%+6.3pp
Two or More Races14.0%17.3%+3.3pp
Students with Disabilities15.8%20.4%+4.6pp
English Learners4.9%10.8%+5.9pp
Homeless36.4%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.8%18.4%+5.6pp
All Students9.9%14.8%+4.9pp
Pacific Islander35.7%
Foster Youth0.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction