ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Creekside Elementary · Stockton

Creekside Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Creekside posts low test scores — and English learners here beat the state average for their group by 6 points in ELA. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

2515 Estate Drive, 95209 (opens in new tab)·Lodi Unified·Stockton·Grades TK-6·501 students·84% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 953-8285
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2345
% Exceeded2%21%
% Met+19%43%
Growth-6.1-2.9
Absence34.1%17.9%
Suspension4.7%1.6%
Scope Score
23
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,392 statewide · #31 of 34 in Lodi Unified

Creekside Elementary scores 23 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 6th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “19% proficient” and call it done. Creekside deserves a closer read. The school sits in Stockton, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 6th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 19% meet the standard today, versus 23% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 328%24%11%23%25%
Grade 423%20%18%9%23%
Grade 527%28%15%25%21%
Grade 623%19%27%18%39%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 330%19%15%16%19%
Grade 416%15%10%4%14%
Grade 515%10%6%6%11%
Grade 616%13%9%8%25%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

22%
75%
Grade 3 · 25% proficient
19%
77%
Grade 4 · 23% proficient
16%
79%
Grade 5 · 21% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
2.3%
State 21.3%
19.0pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-6.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
18.8%
State 42.7%
23.9pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
34.1%
State 17.9%
16.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
4.7%
State 1.6%
3.1pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.3%
State 18.0%
3.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Creekside Elementary in Stockton, 24.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Creekside Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 8.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (15.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.4% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 242 students tested.

All students at this school: 22% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 22%, district —, state 43%22%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 29%, state 32%20% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 32%, state 42%23% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 20%, district 35%, state 44%20% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 22%, district 27%, state 32%22% · +1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 14%, district 9%, state 11%14% · −8 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 8%, district 19%, state 26%8% · −14 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 14%, district 11%, state 15%14% · −8 vs school

9 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 4.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 34.1%, district 23.4%, state 17.9%34.1% · +16.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 4.7%, district —, state 1.6%4.7% · +3.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (52.5% vs 31.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–631.9%
TK/K52.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 22:125:1
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience14.8 years
Fully credentialed90%
First-year teachers4%
Intern / emergency permit3.9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$64,739 – $120,665
Principal salary$149,591 – $184,788
Superintendent salary$313,635

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,136, CA average $14,815$17,136 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,150 per student

$1,150 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,750 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support12%
Student services10%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,545 per pupil
2019$12,593 per pupil
2018$12,898 per pupil
2017$11,165 per pupil
2016$10,723 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic46.3%
District 48.7% · CA 56.1%
Other19.4%
District 9.9% · CA 9.0%
Asian14.4%
District 19.0% · CA 10.2%
Black13.8%
District 6.4% · CA 4.8%
White6.2%
District 15.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 83.8% (20pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$109K · CA $85K
Median home value$495K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+27% · CA 35%
ZIP population47,409
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 9% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Creekside Elementary a good elementary school?

Creekside Elementary has a Scope Score of 23 out of 100, placing it in the 6th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,392 statewide. 2.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 19.0 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Creekside Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 18.8% of students at Creekside Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 2.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 16.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 2.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 429 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Creekside Elementary rank in California?

Creekside Elementary ranks #5,392 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 6th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Creekside Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Creekside Elementary decreases by 6.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Creekside Elementary?

34.1% of students at Creekside Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 4.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Creekside Elementary compare to other schools in Stockton?

Creekside Elementary scores 23/100 (6th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 501 students. Use the schools in Stockton page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Creekside Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Creekside Elementary in Stockton, 24.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Creekside Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 8.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (15.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (25.4% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 242 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
2.3%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 32th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-6.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 42th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
18.8%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 32th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
34.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 24th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
4.7%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 25th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3683%22%32%43%25%−18
Grade 4704%19%26%51%23%−22
Grade 5765%16%24%55%21%−27
Grade 6595%34%25%36%39%−8
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3690%19%30%51%19%−27
Grade 4700%14%29%57%14%−27
Grade 5761%9%17%72%11%−25
Grade 6598%17%20%54%25%−10
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11750%9%52%39%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged24224.4%−9−14
Hispanic/Latino13025.4%−7−13
English Learners5016.0%+7+6
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Creekside Elementary ←232.3%18.8%−6.14.7%
John Muir Elementary0.5 mi4627.5%50.3%+14.01.5%
Julia Morgan Elementary0.9 mi3916.2%40.7%−4.23.0%
Lincoln Elementary2.4 mi3714.9%37.6%−15.14.7%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
2019225#52257.9%23.0%20.4%5.6%-8.1pp
20222212#50616.1%19.5%49.4%3.7%-2.0pp
2023173#55633.3%12.6%44.7%5.1%-2.6pp
2024203#55423.2%14.0%33.3%5.5%-4.3pp
2025236#53922.3%18.8%34.1%4.7%-6.1pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 14 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female17.8%38.9%+21.1pp
Male24.0%31.7%+7.7pp
Asian12.1%19.7%+7.6pp
Black/African American18.8%49.4%+30.6pp
Filipino6.3%
White5.3%24.2%+18.9pp
Hispanic/Latino23.5%37.5%+14.0pp
Two or More Races30.9%37.5%+6.6pp
Students with Disabilities25.7%33.7%+8.0pp
English Learners23.5%15.9%-7.6pp
Foster Youth5.9%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged21.9%36.5%+14.6pp
All Students20.6%35.2%+14.6pp
Homeless84.6%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction