ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Monroe Elementary · San Leandro

Monroe Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Monroe posts 37% meeting the standard and 14.8% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

3750 Monterey Boulevard, 94578 (opens in new tab)·San Leandro Unified·San Leandro·Grades TK-5·410 students·82% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 618-4340
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3945
% Exceeded15%21%
% Met+37%43%
Growth-6.7-2.9
Absence17.3%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
39
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,354 statewide · #4 of 9 in San Leandro Unified

Monroe Elementary scores 39 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 42nd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “37% proficient” and call it done. Monroe deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Leandro, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 42nd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 37% meet the standard today, versus 43% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%40%42%41%50%
Grade 433%36%39%29%29%
Grade 552%49%43%54%43%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 356%53%49%37%43%
Grade 429%18%31%26%18%
Grade 538%28%16%32%37%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

22%
28%
50%
Grade 3 · 50% proficient
9%
21%
70%
Grade 4 · 30% proficient
16%
27%
57%
Grade 5 · 43% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 5.7pp across grades; the floor slips 7.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
14.8%
State 21.3%
6.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-6.7pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
36.6%
State 42.7%
6.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.3%
State 17.9%
0.6pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.5%
State 18.0%
3.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Monroe Elementary in San Leandro, 38.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Monroe Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 163 students tested.

All students at this school: 37% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 37%, district —, state 43%37%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 35%, district 27%, state 32%35% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 33%, district 32%, state 42%33% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 42%, district 34%, state 44%42% · +5 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 29%, district 23%, state 32%29% · −8 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 19%, district 10%, state 11%19% · −18 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 56%, district 58%, state 72%56% · +19 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 18%, district 11%, state 15%18% · −19 vs school

6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +11.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.3%, district 24.7%, state 17.9%17.3% · −0.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (25.9% vs 13.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.9%
TK/K25.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 22:122:1
Teaching staff23 teachers
Avg. experience13.0 years
Fully credentialed89%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$89,138 – $159,691
Principal salary$189,856 – $233,618
Superintendent salary$390,352

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,469, CA average $14,815$23,469 · spent at this school
Federal share$672 per student

$672 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,588 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support10%
Student services8%
Administration6%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,807 per pupil
2019$12,753 per pupil
2018$12,979 per pupil
2017$12,258 per pupil
2016$11,661 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic34.6%
District 49.4% · CA 56.1%
Asian32.7%
District 18.9% · CA 10.2%
Other17.8%
District 14.5% · CA 9.0%
Black7.6%
District 10.4% · CA 4.8%
White7.3%
District 6.9% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 81.7% (18pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$94K · CA $85K
Median home value$823K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+26% · CA 35%
ZIP population41,769
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 28% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Monroe Elementary a good elementary school?

Monroe Elementary has a Scope Score of 39 out of 100, placing it in the 42nd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,354 statewide. 14.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Monroe Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 36.6% of students at Monroe Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 14.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 14.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 396 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Monroe Elementary rank in California?

Monroe Elementary ranks #3,354 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 42nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Monroe Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Monroe Elementary decreases by 6.7 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Monroe Elementary?

17.3% of students at Monroe Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Monroe Elementary compare to other schools in San Leandro?

Monroe Elementary scores 39/100 (42nd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 410 students. Use the schools in San Leandro page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Monroe Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Monroe Elementary in San Leandro, 38.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 33.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Monroe Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (32.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (35.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 163 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
14.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 44th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-6.7pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 46th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
36.6%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.3%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36022%28%18%32%50%+7
Grade 4589%21%33%38%29%−15
Grade 57516%27%27%31%43%−5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36317%25%19%38%43%−3
Grade 46110%8%34%48%18%−24
Grade 57915%22%19%44%37%+1
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/117911%16%51%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16338.7%+5+0
Hispanic/Latino7735.1%+5−4
English Learners5117.6%+7+7
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Monroe Elementary ←3914.8%36.6%−6.70.1%
Madison Elementary0.8 mi5328.1%56.3%+12.92.1%
Bay Elementary1.8 mi5022.3%44.4%−7.50.1%
Roosevelt Elementary2.6 mi5031.4%53.6%−7.11.1%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194148#285919.3%43.1%10.8%0.0%-9.3pp
20222725#430212.7%37.3%45.6%0.5%-8.3pp
20232923#440712.1%36.6%31.4%0.0%-15.8pp
20243839#352314.9%36.5%23.9%0.1%+3.7pp
20253942#335414.8%36.6%17.3%0.1%-6.7pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female11.4%15.3%+3.9pp
Male10.4%19.0%+8.6pp
Asian3.2%9.9%+6.7pp
Black/African American18.4%23.5%+5.1pp
White5.7%13.8%+8.1pp
Hispanic/Latino13.8%21.6%+7.8pp
Two or More Races11.1%16.1%+5.0pp
Students with Disabilities20.3%23.0%+2.7pp
English Learners7.1%20.1%+13.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.5%18.2%+5.7pp
All Students10.8%17.3%+6.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction