ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Hillview Middle · Menlo Park

Hillview Middle: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Hillview posts 52.3% exceeding the standard — versus 16.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

1100 Elder Avenue, 94025 (opens in new tab)·Menlo Park City Elementary·Menlo Park·Grades 6-8·846 students·11% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(650) 326-4341
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7543
% Exceeded52%17%
% Met+77%39%
Growth-0.4+1.5
Absence6.3%18.5%
Suspension1.3%3.7%
Scope Score
75
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #92 statewide

Hillview Middle scores 75 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 96th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “77% proficient” and call it done. Hillview deserves a closer read. It sits at the 96th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The headline number: 52.3% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 16.8%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 96th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Maintained)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 77% meet the standard today, versus 84% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 684%78%74%79%75%
Grade 787%82%81%81%83%
Grade 884%80%79%79%78%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 680%72%73%77%75%
Grade 784%73%75%75%78%
Grade 884%75%79%75%72%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

43%
32%
25%
Grade 6 · 75% proficient
51%
32%
17%
Grade 7 · 83% proficient
45%
33%
22%
Grade 8 · 78% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 1.7pp across grades; the floor rises 2.2pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
52.3%
State 16.8%
35.4pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-0.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
76.8%
State 39.3%
37.5pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
6.3%
State 18.5%
12.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.3%
State 3.7%
2.3pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
23.3%
State 18.0%
5.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Hillview Middle in Menlo Park, 44.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 44.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hillview Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.9% Math proficient); White students (83.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 52.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 103 students tested.

All students at this school: 77% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 77%, district —, state 39%77%
MaleMale: this school 75%, district 77%, state 42%75% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 82%, district 84%, state 56%82% · +5 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 79%, district 81%, state 44%79% · +2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 50%, district 51%, state 32%50% · −26 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 91%, district 93%, state 72%91% · +15 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 42%, state 32%40% · −36 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 87%, district 89%, state 56%87% · +10 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 27%, district 37%, state 15%27% · −50 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.9pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +6.9pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 6.3%, district 5.9%, state 18.5%6.3% · −12.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.3%, district —, state 3.7%1.3% · −2.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–66.9%
Grades 7–85.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 16:1, district 17:116:1
Teaching staff58 teachers
Avg. experience17.0 years
Fully credentialed78%
First-year teachers3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$79,286 – $161,960
Principal salary$223,899 – $0
Superintendent salary$279,838

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $13,437, CA average $14,815$13,437 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$3 per student

$3 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,255 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction67%
Instruction support11%
Student services7%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance7%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$22,268 per pupil
2019$20,059 per pupil
2018$18,728 per pupil
2017$17,368 per pupil
2016$16,301 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White50.5%
District 46.0% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic20.1%
District 20.6% · CA 56.1%
Asian17.3%
District 18.0% · CA 10.2%
Other11.5%
District 14.7% · CA 9.0%
Black0.7%
District 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 11.2% (53pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$217K · CA $85K
Median home value$2.00M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+73% · CA 35%
ZIP population40,721
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 67% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hillview Middle a good middle school?

Hillview Middle has a Scope Score of 75 out of 100, placing it in the 96th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #92 statewide. 52.3% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 35.4 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Hillview Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 76.8% of students at Hillview Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 52.3% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 52.3% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,598 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Hillview Middle rank in California?

Hillview Middle ranks #92 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 96th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Hillview Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Hillview Middle decreases by 0.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Hillview Middle?

6.3% of students at Hillview Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 1.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Hillview Middle compare to other schools in Menlo Park?

Hillview Middle scores 75/100 (96th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 846 students. Use the schools in Menlo Park page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Hillview Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Hillview Middle in Menlo Park, 44.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 44.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hillview Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.9% Math proficient); White students (83.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 52.4 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 103 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
52.3%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 89th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-0.4pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 57th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
76.8%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 80th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
6.3%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 67th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.3%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 59th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
23.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 53th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 626843%32%13%11%75%+29
Grade 726351%32%10%6%83%+36
Grade 826745%33%13%9%78%+31
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 627057%18%14%11%75%+40
Grade 726459%19%14%8%78%+44
Grade 826659%13%13%15%72%+40
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1127040%28%29%4%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10344.7%+0+6
White38883.5%−1+22
Hispanic/Latino16454.9%+1+16
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Hillview Middle ←7552.3%76.8%−0.41.3%
La Entrada Middle0.7 mi8159.9%84.1%−6.91.7%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20198199#2060.2%83.8%5.3%1.0%+1.6pp
20227797#6448.4%76.6%11.0%1.3%+2.5pp
20238097#6047.3%76.6%9.5%1.1%+5.4pp
20247796#7950.9%77.8%7.2%1.2%-0.8pp
20257596#9252.3%76.8%6.3%1.3%-0.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female5.4%5.7%+0.3pp
Male5.2%6.4%+1.2pp
Asian0.0%4.7%+4.7pp
Hispanic/Latino6.7%11.0%+4.3pp
Two or More Races3.8%2.5%-1.3pp
Students with Disabilities13.7%9.6%-4.1pp
English Learners7.1%16.1%+9.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12.9%12.0%-0.9pp
All Students5.3%6.1%+0.8pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction