Evelyn Costahigher than 98 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Evelyn Costahigher than 98 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Evelyn Costahigher than 98 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 77% and 82% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 198 in English, 199 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
Advanced
63%
Proficient
19%
Below Proficient
18%
82% proficient or advanced · 199 tested
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Lammersville Joint Unified
Advanced
63%
21%
50%
Proficient
19%
21%
23%
Developing
11%
25%
17%
Minimal
7%
33%
10%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
What these tests tell you · what to ask
Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.
Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?
Things worth knowing
Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Accelerated in English and Exceptional in math.grades 4–8 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 4–8: 267
Comparison
267 students in grades 4–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
53% in English and 63% in math reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% and 21% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
53%English · exceeded the standard63%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 198 in English, 199 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
35 of 641 students missed 10% or more of school days, close to the average Lammersville Joint Unified school.2025–26
6 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
Source
CDE chronic absenteeism file, 2025–26
Students
all students counted for chronic absence (CDE’s eligible enrollment): 641
Comparison
35 of 641. District and California figures are averages of school rates (8 Lammersville Joint Unified schools; 5,728 scored California elementary schools), our calculation.
Comparisons & progress
Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.
Same grades, same year
How does this school compare?
English
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school77%
California46%
Tested: 198 here · 1,208,894 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school77%
Lammersville Joint Unified72%
Tested: 198 here · 1,805 in Lammersville Joint Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 8 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Lammersville Joint Unified
Advanced
53%
24%
47%
Proficient
24%
22%
25%
Developing
14%
21%
15%
Minimal
9%
33%
13%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Math
grades 3–5Spring 2026
All students tested
How it compares · proficient or advanced
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school82%
California42%
Tested: 199 here · 1,211,701 in California.
Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%
This school82%
Lammersville Joint Unified73%
Tested: 199 here · 1,809 in Lammersville Joint Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 8 schools.
Explore the results & sources
Level
Here
California
Lammersville Joint Unified
Advanced
63%
21%
50%
Proficient
19%
21%
23%
Developing
11%
25%
17%
Minimal
7%
33%
10%
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Progress over time
How have test results changed?
English
Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2024.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Evelyn CostaCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202677%46%
Evelyn CostaCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
Evelyn CostaCalifornia
0%50%100%20172022202682%42%
Evelyn CostaCalifornia
2026 was the highest year in this series in both subjects. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Evelyn Costa
California
2024
69% 146 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
74% 163 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
77% 198 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
Evelyn Costa
California
2024
77% 146 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
80% 163 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
82% 199 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure267 students · grades 4–8 · 2025
English+17ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+30ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 17 points above that prediction, and in math 30 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
School pattern, spring 2026Growth EngineThe school’s aggregate cohort-change index clears our stronger-gains threshold. This is a school-level comparison across years, not tracking of individual children.
Life at school
Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
6 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
8in 100 at the average Lammersville Joint Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
35 of 641 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school6 in 100
at the average Lammersville Joint Unified school8 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
1.2%of students were suspended at least once (8 of 662), 2025–26
1.6%at the average Lammersville Joint Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
5
9 of 186
Grades 7–8
3
4 of 130
Reviews & community voices
Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace
Parent voices
Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Teacher & staff voices
School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.
Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Asian
319 English · 318 math tested
English
90% / 73%
Math
89% / 71%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Lammersville Joint Unified
vs California
Asian · 319 tested in English, 318 in math
English
90%
+486%
+1773%
Math
89%
+386%
+1871%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Lammersville Joint Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
No published rate here for low-income, Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
How each student group did
Read the student-group results as sentences
At Evelyn Costa Elementary in Mountain House, 89.7% of Asian students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, compared to 86.1% district-wide for those same grades and 72.6% statewide for those same grades. Evelyn Costa Elementary’s rate for Asian students exceeds its district average by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Asian students (89.3% met or exceeded the Math standard). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 319 ELA grade test records.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian79%
2Hispanic or Latino7%
3Filipino4%
4Two or more races4%
5White3%
6Black or African American2%
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share2%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
79%
Hispanic or Latino
7%
Filipino
4%
Two or more races
4%
White
3%
Black or African American
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
6 in 100 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (6%, 38 of 612). California: 63%.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Evelyn Costa runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.
Ask Lammersville Joint Unified which school serves your address.
Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.
Similar elementary schools2026 statewide percentile
CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 0–14.2% meal eligibility and 306–1,224 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.
Common questions
Is Evelyn Costa Elementary a good elementary school?
Evelyn Costa Elementary is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 84 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Evelyn Costa Elementary was well above California in English and math: 77% and 82% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Evelyn Costa Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 77% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 82% the math standard; 53% and 63% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 198 students were tested in English and 199 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Evelyn Costa Elementary rank in California?
Evelyn Costa Elementary is in the 98th percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2026). Evelyn Costa Elementary ranks #77 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2026 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), aggregate cohort comparison (2024 G3 → 2026 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Evelyn Costa Elementary getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Evelyn Costa Elementary's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 94th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Evelyn Costa Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 5.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 35 chronically absent of 641 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 1.2%; 8 unduplicated suspended students of 662 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 6.3%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 1.2%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Evelyn Costa Elementary compare to other schools in Mountain House?
Evelyn Costa Elementary is in the 98th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 612 students. Use the schools in Mountain House page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Evelyn Costa Elementary?
At Evelyn Costa Elementary in Mountain House, 89.7% of Asian students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2026 for reported grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, compared to 86.1% district-wide for those same grades and 72.6% statewide for those same grades. Evelyn Costa Elementary’s rate for Asian students exceeds its district average by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Asian students (89.3% met or exceeded the Math standard). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2025-26. 319 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 21.5% · index 86 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 43.0% · index 79 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈94th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 67 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 2.3pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 53 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.2pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.3% · index 100 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
ELA
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
71
44%
28%
20%
8%
72%
+29
Grade 4
64
50%
20%
19%
11%
70%
+26
Grade 5
63
65%
25%
3%
6%
90%
+42
Grade 6
58
45%
38%
14%
3%
83%
+37
Grade 7
63
51%
41%
5%
3%
92%
+44
Grade 8
64
67%
30%
2%
2%
97%
+49
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5685 reporting schools
State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5706 reporting schools
State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 48.1%; n=5715 reporting schools
State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4052 reporting schools
State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 48.5%; n=2627 reporting schools
State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2647 reporting schools
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
CDE CAASPP 2026
Math
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
MET+
+/CA
Grade 3
72
57%
25%
10%
8%
82%
+36
Grade 4
64
63%
19%
13%
6%
81%
+40
Grade 5
63
71%
13%
10%
6%
84%
+48
Grade 6
58
59%
22%
12%
7%
81%
+46
Grade 7
64
66%
19%
14%
2%
84%
+49
Grade 8
64
83%
9%
6%
2%
92%
+58
California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.
State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 46.0%; n=5687 reporting schools
State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.4%; n=5704 reporting schools
State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.6%; n=5717 reporting schools
State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.9%; n=4050 reporting schools
State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 35.1%; n=2627 reporting schools
State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 33.9%; n=2651 reporting schools
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met+
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
66
65.2%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
50
78.0%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
47
83.0%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
64
78.1%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
64
93.8%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
64
84.4%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
66
78.8%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
50
80.0%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
47
80.8%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
64
75.0%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
64
85.9%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
64
75.0%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
48
66.7%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
43
65.1%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
55
74.5%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
64
82.8%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
59
88.1%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
31
83.9%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
48
77.1%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
43
81.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
55
72.7%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
64
84.4%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
60
70.0%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
32
71.9%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
EXC
MET
NEAR
NOT
Schoolwide
126
53%
29%
17%
1%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
MET+
vs district
vs CA
Asian
319
89.7%
+4
+17
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Exc
Met+
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2024
—
—
—
45.3%
72.9%
7.8%
1.8%
+1.8pp
2025
—
—
—
51.5%
77.6%
8.6%
1.4%
+9.9pp
2026
84
98
#77
58.3%
80.0%
6.3%
1.2%
+10.4pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
What we can't show
— Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
—
4.5%
—
Male
—
6.4%
—
Asian
—
3.4%
—
Black/African American
—
23.1%
—
Filipino
—
0.0%
—
Hispanic/Latino
—
15.9%
—
Two or More Races
—
8.7%
—
White
—
26.3%
—
Students with Disabilities
—
5.3%
—
English Learners
—
2.5%
—
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
—
27.5%
—
All Students
—
5.5%
—
Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+17
267
Accelerated
+30
267
Exceptional
Asian
+17
232
Accelerated
+32
232
Exceptional
English Only
+20
99
not categorised
+24
99
not categorised
English Learner
+6
64
Accelerated
+31
64
Exceptional
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+7
50
not categorised
+33
50
not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+9
17
Accelerated
+21
17
Exceptional
English Learners Only
−1
14
not categorised
+17
14
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
+3
13
Average
+21
13
Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino
+22
11
Exceptional
+9
11
Accelerated
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
44%
exceeded standard · 67% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 48 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
65%
exceeded standard · 90% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 63 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 48 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
267 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +17 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 92nd percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.92nd pctile · +17 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8Source and benchmark
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
267 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +30 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 98th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.98th pctile · +30 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$9,816 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 6,397 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
Central federal expenditures attributed here$153 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 612
District current expense · FY 2024–25$13,448 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
ShowHide how the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2021–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95391
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95391
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$176,952
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
54.02%
ZCTA population
25,574
Median age
35.1 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.