ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Grant K-8 · San Diego

Grant K-8: Two in five kids exceed the standard. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.

Grant K-8 is one of the strongest elementary schools in San Diego by raw achievement. The catch worth understanding: the cohort doesn't gain ground year-over-year.

1425 Washington Place, 92103 (opens in new tab)·San Diego Unified·San Diego·Grades TK-8·743 students·30% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(619) 293-4420·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6145
% Exceeded46%21%
% Met+76%43%
Growth-9.4-2.9
Absence13.5%17.9%
Suspension0.9%1.6%
Scope Score
61
🏫 Solid Base · Solid
ranked #929 statewide · #28 of 137 in San Diego Unified

Grant K-8 scores 61 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 84th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.

Most rating sites would stop at “76% proficient” and call it done. Grant K-8 deserves a closer read. The school sits in San Diego, where one in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 45.6% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 84th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 76% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 373%66%80%73%80%
Grade 464%68%65%66%76%
Grade 577%56%74%70%72%
Grade 669%66%54%72%73%
Grade 774%72%75%68%74%
Grade 881%68%71%75%58%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 379%68%86%83%80%
Grade 482%63%86%82%77%
Grade 576%58%67%74%70%
Grade 656%62%52%64%58%
Grade 751%61%64%48%65%
Grade 861%54%52%51%45%

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
45.6%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The trajectory · grade 3→5
9.4pp

proficiency runs 80% in this year's grade 3 against 71% in its grade 5. The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

54%
26%
20%
Grade 3 · 80% proficient
47%
29%
24%
Grade 4 · 76% proficient
46%
26%
28%
Grade 5 · 72% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 8.0pp across grades; the floor slips 8.0pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
45.6%
State 21.3%
24.3pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-9.4pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
75.9%
State 42.7%
33.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.5%
State 17.9%
4.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.9%
State 1.6%
0.7pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
26.5%
State 18.0%
8.5pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Grant K-8 in San Diego, 46.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grant K-8 outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.5% Math proficient); White students (81.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 154 students tested.

All students at this school: 69% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 69%, district —, state 43%69%
FemaleFemale: this school 70%, district 51%, state 44%70% · +1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 78%, district 71%, state 56%78% · +9 vs school
MaleMale: this school 68%, district 50%, state 42%68% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 42%, district 36%, state 32%42% · −27 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 53%, district 35%, state 32%53% · −15 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 26%, district 21%, state 15%26% · −43 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 77%, district 63%, state 56%77% · +8 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 13.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.5%, district 20.8%, state 17.9%13.5% · −4.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.9%, district —, state 1.6%0.9% · −0.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–611.5%
Grades 7–816.4%
TK/K16.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 23:122:1
Teaching staff39 teachers
Avg. experience21.8 years
Fully credentialed94%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$55,375 – $124,275
Principal salary$0 – $187,294
Superintendent salary$300,404

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,272, CA average $14,815$20,272 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,001 per student

$1,001 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,967 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,976 per pupil
2019$14,540 per pupil
2018$14,457 per pupil
2017$11,416 per pupil
2016$11,708 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White51.7%
District 22.9% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic30.0%
District 47.0% · CA 56.1%
Other13.2%
District 13.8% · CA 9.0%
Asian2.7%
District 8.7% · CA 10.2%
Black2.4%
District 7.5% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 29.7% (34pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$103K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.06M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+65% · CA 35%
ZIP population34,836
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 743 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 53% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grant K-8 a good elementary school?

Grant K-8 has a Scope Score of 61 out of 100, placing it in the 84th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #929 statewide. 45.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 24.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Grant K-8's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 75.9% of students at Grant K-8 met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 45.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 45.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 461 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Grant K-8 rank in California?

Grant K-8 ranks #929 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 84th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Grant K-8 getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Grant K-8 decreases by 9.4 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Grant K-8?

13.5% of students at Grant K-8 are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.9%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Grant K-8 compare to other schools in San Diego?

Grant K-8 scores 61/100 (84th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 743 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Grant K-8 serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Grant K-8 in San Diego, 46.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grant K-8 outperforms its district average for low-income students by 4.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.5% Math proficient); White students (81.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 154 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
45.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 73th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-9.4pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 38th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
75.9%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 75th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.5%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 57th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.9%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 56th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
26.5%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39254%26%9%11%80%+37
Grade 47047%29%14%10%76%+31
Grade 56946%26%13%14%72%+25
Grade 67740%32%21%6%73%+26
Grade 79335%39%13%13%74%+27
Grade 88529%28%31%12%58%+12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39249%32%13%7%80%+35
Grade 46939%38%22%1%77%+35
Grade 56938%32%26%4%70%+34
Grade 67744%14%22%19%58%+23
Grade 79338%27%20%15%65%+31
Grade 88317%28%24%31%45%+12
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1115430%23%44%4%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15446.8%+4+9
White23881.9%+7+20
Hispanic/Latino15357.5%+16+19
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Grant K-8 ←6145.6%75.9%−9.40.9%
Birney Elementary1.6 mi7445.7%76.2%+14.02.1%
Bay Park Elementary3 mi5934.6%66.3%−6.60.3%
Longfellow K-82.5 mi5840.0%69.7%−16.12.2%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197191#49046.8%75.2%7.5%2.9%+0.7pp
20225280#115639.1%63.0%34.7%1.0%-9.8pp
20236287#76346.0%76.3%22.7%0.8%-12.9pp
20247192#43447.7%74.6%15.7%2.0%-5.7pp
20256184#92945.6%75.9%13.5%0.9%-9.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.2%12.5%+5.3pp
Male7.9%13.8%+5.9pp
Asian7.4%4.0%-3.4pp
Black/African American8.6%5.0%-3.6pp
White14.3%
Hispanic/Latino11.5%24.6%+13.1pp
Two or More Races2.9%10.3%+7.4pp
Students with Disabilities12.0%21.4%+9.4pp
English Learners11.9%19.6%+7.7pp
Homeless18.8%40.9%+22.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.8%27.8%+17.0pp
All Students7.5%13.2%+5.7pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction