ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Birney Elementary · San DiegoPublic

Birney Elementary: Two in five kids exceed the standard. But the zoned next school is Developing on its own scale.

Birney holds its own. The zoned next stop, Roosevelt International Middle, sits at the 44th percentile among California middle schools. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.

4345 Campus Avenue, 92103 (opens in new tab)·San Diego Unified·San Diego·Grades TK-5·535 students·45% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(619) 497-3500·Website
Scope Score
69
Strong Growth Engine
ranked #367 statewide · #8 of 135 in San Diego Unified
253 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 69 tracked

Birney Elementary scores 69 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 94th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “76% proficient” and call it done. Birney deserves a closer read. Two in five of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Birney's low-income kids hit 63.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The zoned path
  1. This school
    69/100Strong
    elementary scale
  2. Roosevelt International Middle
    34/100Developing
    middle scale
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6939
% Exceeded46%21%
% Met+76%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strong · p93Average · p50
Absence11.4%17.9%
Suspension2.1%1.6%

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 94th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

ELABlue(Increased)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 76% of students meet the standard today, above the 69% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 365%70%71%65%67%
Grade 474%83%80%84%82%
Grade 569%79%70%78%81%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 369%63%71%61%64%
Grade 473%84%65%78%85%
Grade 563%61%61%63%78%

Where its students land

ELA
Exceeded 47%Met 29%Nearly Met 15%Not Met 9%
Math
Exceeded 44%Met 31%Nearly Met 16%Not Met 8%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded

The story this school is actually telling

The ceiling · exceeded standard
45.7%

of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.4%.

↑ what most “best schools” lists are measuring
The next step · the zoned path
34/100

is the Scope Score at Roosevelt International Middle, the zoned next stop — Developing, 44th percentile among California middle schools. Elementary-school and middle-school scores are separate scales, so read it as the next stop's own standing. Worth asking about on a tour.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

34%
32%
34%
Grade 3 · 66% proficient
61%
21%
18%
Grade 4 · 82% proficient
46%
35%
19%
Grade 5 · 81% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 11.9pp across grades; the floor rises 14.5pp. The state average rises 4.6pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

63.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Birney's most underrated number

63.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Birney low-income: 63.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
45.7%
State 21.4%
24.3pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
76.2%
State 42.7%
33.5pp above state avg
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
Strong
State average
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 89 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
11.4%
State 17.9%
6.5pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.1%
State 1.6%
0.5pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
32.8%
State 18.0%
14.8pp above state avg
The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
39%
exceeded standard · 71% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
46%
exceeded standard · 81% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do. The two measures land in the same neighbourhood here — ours puts this school around the 93rd percentile of California elementary schools, the state's around the 100th in reading and math together. Two different methods agreeing is the most you can ask of one year of test data.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 93rd percentile among California elementary schools.93rd pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +38 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 99th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.99th pctile · +38 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +40 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 99th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.99th pctile · +40 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.

  • Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Birney Elementary in San Diego, 63.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Birney Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 20.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (68.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (69.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 12.7 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 137 students tested.

All students at this school: 76% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 76%, district —, state 43%76%
FemaleFemale: this school 78%, district 51%, state 44%78% · +2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 66%, district 36%, state 32%66% · −10 vs school
MaleMale: this school 74%, district 50%, state 42%74% · −2 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 68%, district 35%, state 32%68% · −8 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 90%, district 71%, state 56%90% · +14 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 74%, district 63%, state 56%74% · −3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 50%, district 21%, state 15%50% · −26 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 58%, district 27%, state 26%58% · −18 vs school

6 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 13.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +5.6pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only121 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +32 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 121 students.+32 pts · +29 vs typical
Low-income students74 studentsLow-income students, reading: +43 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 74 students.+43 pts · +43 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students62 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +38 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 62 students.+38 pts · +37 vs typical
White50 studentsWhite, reading: +26 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 50 students.+26 pts · +21 vs typical
Math
English Only121 studentsEnglish Only, math: +35 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 121 students.+35 pts · +34 vs typical
Low-income students73 studentsLow-income students, math: +47 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 73 students.+47 pts · +48 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students61 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: +32 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 61 students.+32 pts · +33 vs typical
White50 studentsWhite, math: +44 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 50 students.+44 pts · +39 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.4%, district 20.2%, state 17.9%11.4% · −6.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.1%, district —, state 1.6%2.1% · +0.5pp vs state

Grades 4–6 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of TK/K students (13.3% vs 8.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.3%
TK/K8.5%

Where the path goes

The zoned next stop's own verdict is at the top of this page — the path below shows how the boundary gets there.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

San Diego HighScope 52direct feeder

The road from this school ends at San Diego High, which sent 51 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 3 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach San Diego High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 70% of San Diego High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

51 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 3 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on San Diego High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 23:124:1
PrincipalGraciela Rosas
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience21.1 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$55,375 – $124,275
Principal salaryUp to $187,294
Superintendent salary$300,404

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,210, CA average $14,491$20,210 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,032 per student

$1,032 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,967 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,976 per pupil
2019$14,540 per pupil
2018$14,457 per pupil
2017$11,416 per pupil
2016$11,708 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
White38.1%
District 22.9% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic33.3%
District 47.0% · CA 56.1%
Other15.5%
District 13.8% · CA 9.0%
Black9.3%
District 7.5% · CA 4.8%
Asian3.7%
District 8.7% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 45.2% (19pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$103K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.06M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+65% · CA 35%
ZIP population34,836
Median age41 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 81% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Birney Elementary a good elementary school?

Birney Elementary has a Scope Score of 69 out of 100, placing it in the 94th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #367 statewide. 45.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 24.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Birney Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 76.2% of students at Birney Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 45.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 30.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 45.7% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 505 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Birney Elementary rank in California?

Birney Elementary ranks #367 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 94th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Birney Elementary getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Birney Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California elementary schools — roughly the 93rd percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Birney Elementary?

11.4% of students at Birney Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.1%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Birney Elementary compare to other schools in San Diego?

Birney Elementary scores 69/100 (94th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 535 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Birney Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Birney Elementary in San Diego, 63.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Birney Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 20.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (68.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (69.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 12.7 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 137 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

What middle school does Birney Elementary feed into?

By attendance boundary, Birney Elementary is zoned to Roosevelt International Middle. Roosevelt International Middle has a Scope Score of 34 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
45.7%
↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 74 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded · 23%
76.2%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 76 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) · 20%
Strong
↑ vs CA average · 93rd pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.4%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
▼ 0.4pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
2.1%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · index 46 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
▼ 0.2pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
32.8%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · index 71 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39034%32%18%16%67%+24
Grade 49461%21%13%5%82%+37
Grade 56946%35%14%4%81%+33
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39033%31%20%16%64%+19
Grade 49455%30%12%3%85%+44
Grade 56844%34%16%6%78%+43

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide6946%35%19%0%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13763.5%+21+25
Hispanic/Latino9769.1%+28+30
White8790.8%+16+29
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Birney Elementary ←6945.7%76.2%+14.0pp+89 pts2.1%
McKinley Elementary2 mi7352.0%80.9%+2.5pp0.3%
Grant K-81.6 mi5945.6%75.9%−9.4pp0.9%
Chesterton Elementary2.8 mi5737.9%63.8%+10.2pp0.6%
California average3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20196486#75243.7%68.8%9.6%0.8%-0.5pp
20226991#51846.4%73.4%25.5%0.9%+4.0pp
20236185#85038.5%69.9%17.1%2.4%-5.5pp
20246590#55145.6%71.4%11.8%2.3%+6.8pp
20256994#36745.7%76.2%11.4%2.1%+14.0pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female10.0%6.3%-3.7pp
Male9.0%15.8%+6.8pp
Asian15.4%14.3%-1.1pp
Black/African American14.1%7.7%-6.4pp
Hispanic/Latino8.8%15.8%+7.0pp
Two or More Races12.2%11.9%-0.3pp
White6.1%6.8%+0.7pp
Students with Disabilities15.1%17.9%+2.8pp
English Learners8.3%10.2%+1.9pp
Homeless45.5%35.7%-9.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.6%16.0%+2.4pp
All Students9.5%11.0%+1.5pp
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+38150Exceptional+40149Exceptional
English Only+32121not categorised+35121not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+4374Exceptional+4773Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino+3862Exceptional+3261Exceptional
White+2650Exceptional+4450Exceptional
Two or More Races+4323Exceptional+4023Exceptional
Students with Disabilities+3021Exceptional+3721Exceptional
English Learner+5818Exceptional+6018Exceptional
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+6113not categorised+5913not categorised

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/birney-elementary-9259"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Birney Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-07methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction