ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Los Angeles

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki posts 44.5% exceeding the standard — versus 16.8% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

Scope Score
74
💪 Strong All-Around · Strong
ranked #116 statewide · #4 of 226 in Los Angeles Unified

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki scores 74 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 95th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “76% proficient” and call it done. Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki deserves a closer read. It sits at the 95th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki's low-income kids hit 86.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

57%
34%
9%
Grade 6 · 91% proficient
50%
40%
10%
Grade 7 · 90% proficient
53%
35%
12%
Grade 8 · 88% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.8pp across grades; the floor slips 2.7pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

86.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki's most underrated number

86.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki low-income: 86.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
44.5%
State 16.8%
27.7pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
76.3%
State 39.3%
37.0pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
+0.3pp
State +1.5pp
Scores improve across grades
Chronic absenteeism
10.3%
State 18.5%
8.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.2%
State 3.7%
3.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Path

Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki serves grades K-12 — students can complete their entire K-12 education here.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic27.6%
White30.5%
Asian10.9%
Black13.7%
Other17.4%
GenderFemale 100.0%
Resources & Access
Transitional Kindergarten
No TK reported, 2025-26
California requires the district to offer TK, but not every site has a room — ask the district which campuses do.
Per-Pupil Spending
$24,368
District avg: $18,180 · CA avg: $14,815 · School-level · CDE ESSA
Teacher Salary Range
$60,420 – $122,706
District schedule · CA median ~$98K
At Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki in Los Angeles, 86.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki outperforms its district average for low-income students by 45.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (60.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (85.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.9 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 243 students tested.
Equity Gaps
Math · Black−26.1pp
37.2% vs 63.3% overall · n=35
3 more gaps by subject
ELA · Black−17.9pp
71.2% vs 89.1% overall · n=35
ELA Exceeded · Black−37.8pp
16.8% vs 54.6% overall · n=35
Math Exceeded · Black−24.9pp
10.5% vs 35.4% overall · n=35

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income244 tested
ELA 86.0%·Math 60.2%· +45.1pp vs district
Hispanic123 tested
ELA 85.2%·Math 52.0%· +44.2pp vs district
White121 tested
ELA 97.5%·Math 76.9%· +28.6pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 9.3pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 55%Support 40%Other 4%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$35K
$50K below CA median
Median Home Value
$862K
$203K above CA median
Bachelor's+
29%
6pp below CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
8.0 years avg experience
36 teachers · 11% second-year
Teacher Credentials
99% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →

Frequently asked questions

Is Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki a good middle school?
Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki has a Scope Score of 74 out of 100, placing it in the 95th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #116 statewide. 44.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 27.7 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 76.3% of students at Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 44.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 31.7% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 44.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 675 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki rank in California?
Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki ranks #116 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 95th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki increases by 0.3 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki?
10.3% of students at Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 0.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki scores 74/100 (95th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki in Los Angeles, 86.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki outperforms its district average for low-income students by 45.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (60.2% Math proficient); Hispanic students (85.2% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 17.9 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 243 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
44.5%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 81th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
76.3%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 79th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 15%
+0.3pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 57th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
10.3%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 62th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.2%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 64th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 610357%34%8%1%91%+45
Grade 710350%40%5%6%89%+42
Grade 813153%35%11%1%89%+42
Grade 117958%29%11%1%87%+40
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 610438%23%30%9%62%+27
Grade 710324%38%31%7%62%+28
Grade 813144%21%23%12%65%+33
Grade 117934%30%23%13%65%+41
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1121024%41%32%2%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged24386.0%+45+48
Hispanic/Latino12285.2%+44+46
White12197.5%+29+36
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki ←7444.5%76.3%+0.30.2%
Magnolia Science Academy 62.8 mi5322.9%48.2%+13.43.7%
Rise Kohyang Middle2.2 mi4518.5%40.9%+3.20.5%
Libertas College Preparatory Charter3 mi4314.8%40.4%+4.60.2%
California average4016.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
73%74%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #111 → #150 → #130 → #115 → #116
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as a middle school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue