ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Charles D. Jones Middle · Baldwin Park

Charles D. Jones Middle: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Charles D. Jones posts low test scores — and attendance holds near the state average — families haven't checked out. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

14250 East Merced Avenue, 91706 (opens in new tab)·Baldwin Park Unified·Baldwin Park·Grades 6-8·423 students·96% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(626) 962-8312
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3043
% Exceeded9%17%
% Met+27%39%
Growth-6.4+1.5
Absence18.9%18.5%
Suspension14.0%3.7%
Scope Score
30
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,706 statewide · #3 of 4 in Baldwin Park Unified

Charles D. Jones Middle scores 30 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 24th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “27% proficient” and call it done. Charles D. Jones deserves a closer read. The school sits in Baldwin Park, where nearly all students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 24th percentile since 2022.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 628%25%35%38%
Grade 741%44%36%32%34%
Grade 839%39%36%42%34%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 616%14%16%24%
Grade 720%12%12%10%16%
Grade 816%14%12%12%15%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
22%
62%
Grade 6 · 38% proficient
11%
23%
66%
Grade 7 · 34% proficient
9%
26%
65%
Grade 8 · 35% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
9.0%
State 16.8%
7.9pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-6.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
26.8%
State 39.3%
12.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.9%
State 18.5%
0.4pp above state avg
Suspension rate
14.0%
State 3.7%
10.4pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
13.8%
State 18.0%
4.2pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Charles D. Jones Middle in Baldwin Park, 35.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Charles D. Jones Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 384 students tested.

All students at this school: 27% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 27%, district —, state 39%27%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 27%, district 33%, state 32%27% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 32%, state 32%23% · −3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 24%, district 34%, state 42%24% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 29%, district 35%, state 44%29% · +3 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 8%, district 11%, state 15%8% · −18 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 5%, district 13%, state 11%5% · −21 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 45%, district 69%, state 72%45% · +19 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 9%, district 23%, state 22%9% · −18 vs school

5 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.2pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +4.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.9%, district 21.8%, state 18.5%18.9% · +0.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 14.0%, district —, state 3.7%14.0% · +10.4pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (22.3% vs 12.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.3%
Grades 7–822.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 16:1, district 21:116:1
Teaching staff28 teachers
Avg. experience19.6 years
Fully credentialed71%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,803 – $133,806
Principal salary$161,641 – $181,508
Superintendent salary$301,854

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,146, CA average $14,815$26,146 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,349 per student

$1,349 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,647 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support13%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,026 per pupil
2019$14,799 per pupil
2018$14,543 per pupil
2017$10,768 per pupil
2016$9,734 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic88.9%
District 89.3% · CA 56.1%
Asian7.3%
District 7.0% · CA 10.2%
Other2.4%
District 2.3% · CA 9.0%
White1.2%
District 1.0% · CA 19.9%
Black0.2%
District 0.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 95.7% (32pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$609K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population71,082
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 423 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Charles D. Jones Middle a good middle school?

Charles D. Jones Middle has a Scope Score of 30 out of 100, placing it in the 24th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,706 statewide. 9.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 7.9 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Charles D. Jones Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 26.8% of students at Charles D. Jones Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 9.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 9.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 820 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Charles D. Jones Middle rank in California?

Charles D. Jones Middle ranks #1,706 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 24th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Charles D. Jones Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Charles D. Jones Middle decreases by 6.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Charles D. Jones Middle?

18.9% of students at Charles D. Jones Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 14.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Charles D. Jones Middle compare to other schools in Baldwin Park?

Charles D. Jones Middle scores 30/100 (24th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 423 students. Use the schools in Baldwin Park page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Charles D. Jones Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Charles D. Jones Middle in Baldwin Park, 35.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Charles D. Jones Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 5.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (18.3% Math proficient); Hispanic students (32.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 33.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 384 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
9.0%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 41th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-6.4pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
26.8%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 40th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.9%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 49th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
14.0%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 8th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
13.8%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 40th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 613416%22%29%33%38%−8
Grade 713311%23%21%45%34%−14
Grade 81379%26%26%39%34%−12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 61418%16%21%55%24%−11
Grade 71357%9%22%62%16%−18
Grade 81403%12%19%66%15%−17
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111404%21%53%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged38435.2%−5−3
Hispanic/Latino36132.1%−7−7
English Learners673.0%−8−7
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Charles D. Jones Middle ←309.0%26.8%−6.414.0%
Sierra Vista Middle0.7 mi4313.9%36.9%+1.06.0%
Sparks Middle2.8 mi388.3%30.0%+6.93.9%
Olive Middle1.7 mi3712.9%32.9%−2.86.2%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20222826#15957.2%25.3%35.8%7.6%+4.2pp
20233536#13946.2%22.3%27.6%8.4%+5.0pp
20243029#15636.8%24.4%19.3%7.7%+2.0pp
20253024#17069.0%26.8%18.9%14.0%-6.4pp
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.9%19.2%+10.3pp
Male5.9%18.6%+12.7pp
Asian0.0%5.9%+5.9pp
Hispanic/Latino7.9%20.1%+12.2pp
Students with Disabilities8.5%28.7%+20.2pp
English Learners9.3%20.8%+11.5pp
Homeless6.5%16.2%+9.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged7.7%19.1%+11.4pp
All Students7.4%18.9%+11.5pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction