ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Foster Elementary · Baldwin Park

Foster Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Foster posts 36% meeting the standard and 11.7% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

13900 Foster Avenue, 91706 (opens in new tab)·Baldwin Park Unified·Baldwin Park·Grades TK-5·430 students·89% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(626) 962-8111
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4245
% Exceeded12%21%
% Met+36%43%
Growth-8.6-2.9
Absence23.1%17.9%
Suspension0.8%1.6%
Scope Score
42
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #2,979 statewide · #3 of 9 in Baldwin Park Unified

Foster Elementary scores 42 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 48th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Foster deserves a closer read. The school sits in Baldwin Park, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 48th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 36% meet the standard today, versus 43% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 339%26%28%32%41%
Grade 442%51%33%37%33%
Grade 556%32%56%40%39%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 343%24%25%39%43%
Grade 445%41%27%31%34%
Grade 534%12%23%13%28%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

8%
33%
59%
Grade 3 · 41% proficient
10%
24%
66%
Grade 4 · 34% proficient
13%
25%
62%
Grade 5 · 38% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 5.5pp across grades; the floor slips 2.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
11.7%
State 21.3%
9.6pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-8.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
36.5%
State 42.7%
6.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
23.1%
State 17.9%
5.1pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.8%
State 1.6%
0.8pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
9.5%
State 18.0%
8.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Foster Elementary in Baldwin Park, 35.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Foster Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 152 students tested.

All students at this school: 37% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 37%, district —, state 43%37%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 36%, district 32%, state 32%36% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 35%, district 33%, state 32%35% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 37%, district 34%, state 42%37% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 35%, state 44%36% · −1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 19%, district 11%, state 15%19% · −18 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 37%, district 13%, state 11%37% · +0 vs school

5 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 4.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 23.1%, district 21.8%, state 17.9%23.1% · +5.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.8%, district —, state 1.6%0.8% · −0.8pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (37.0% vs 15.5%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–615.5%
TK/K37.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 21:120:1
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience22.1 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,803 – $133,806
Principal salary$161,641 – $181,508
Superintendent salary$301,854

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,789, CA average $14,815$26,789 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,025 per student

$1,025 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,647 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support13%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,026 per pupil
2019$14,799 per pupil
2018$14,543 per pupil
2017$10,768 per pupil
2016$9,734 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic95.1%
District 89.3% · CA 56.1%
Asian2.6%
District 7.0% · CA 10.2%
Other1.9%
District 2.3% · CA 9.0%
White0.5%
District 1.0% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 89.3% (26pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$609K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population71,082
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Foster Elementary a good elementary school?

Foster Elementary has a Scope Score of 42 out of 100, placing it in the 48th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,979 statewide. 11.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 9.6 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Foster Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 36.5% of students at Foster Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 11.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 11.7% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 348 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Foster Elementary rank in California?

Foster Elementary ranks #2,979 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 48th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Foster Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Foster Elementary decreases by 8.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Foster Elementary?

23.1% of students at Foster Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.8%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Foster Elementary compare to other schools in Baldwin Park?

Foster Elementary scores 42/100 (48th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 430 students. Use the schools in Baldwin Park page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Foster Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Foster Elementary in Baldwin Park, 35.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Foster Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 4.7 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (34.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 21.9 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 152 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
11.7%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 41th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-8.6pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 60th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
36.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
23.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 42th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.8%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 57th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
9.5%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 39th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3638%33%40%19%41%−2
Grade 44210%24%33%33%33%−11
Grade 56713%25%28%33%39%−9
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36512%31%32%25%43%−3
Grade 44414%20%32%34%34%−8
Grade 56713%15%30%42%28%−7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11679%16%61%13%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15235.5%−5−3
Hispanic/Latino16737.1%−2−2
Students with Disabilities3716.2%+1−1
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Foster Elementary ←4211.7%36.5%−8.60.8%
Manzanita Elementary2.3 mi7034.3%67.3%+0.80.1%
San Jose Charter Academy1 mi5738.9%67.2%−7.60.5%
BP STEM Academy1.9 mi5631.3%66.0%+13.34.5%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194352#264518.0%43.3%11.4%0.8%+4.1pp
20223033#385312.2%30.9%42.2%0.7%-2.8pp
20233951#28119.3%32.0%38.6%0.2%+13.5pp
20243738#35559.7%32.0%22.4%1.0%-8.8pp
20254248#297911.7%36.5%23.1%0.8%-8.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.0%23.8%+14.8pp
Male13.5%23.3%+9.8pp
Asian0.0%8.3%+8.3pp
White6.7%
Hispanic/Latino11.4%24.1%+12.7pp
Students with Disabilities17.5%26.4%+8.9pp
English Learners11.1%16.1%+5.0pp
Homeless9.1%37.9%+28.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.2%23.4%+12.2pp
All Students11.4%23.5%+12.1pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction