ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Olive Middle · Baldwin Park

Olive Middle: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Olive posts 33% meeting the standard and 12.9% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

13701 Olive Street, 91706 (opens in new tab)·Baldwin Park Unified·Baldwin Park·Grades 6-8·477 students·88% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(626) 962-8416
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3743
% Exceeded13%17%
% Met+33%39%
Growth-2.8+1.5
Absence20.5%18.5%
Suspension6.2%3.7%
Scope Score
37
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,318 statewide · #2 of 4 in Baldwin Park Unified

Olive Middle scores 37 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 41st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “33% proficient” and call it done. Olive deserves a closer read. The school sits in Baldwin Park, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 16th to the 41st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 33% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 645%36%39%40%37%
Grade 743%48%43%42%42%
Grade 839%43%46%46%38%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 628%19%21%31%26%
Grade 722%29%21%25%36%
Grade 814%24%23%22%19%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

10%
26%
64%
Grade 6 · 36% proficient
15%
27%
58%
Grade 7 · 42% proficient
10%
29%
61%
Grade 8 · 39% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding holds steady across grades; the floor rises 1.7pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.9%
State 16.8%
4.0pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-2.8pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
32.9%
State 39.3%
6.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
20.5%
State 18.5%
2.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
6.2%
State 3.7%
2.6pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
23.2%
State 18.0%
5.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Olive Middle in Baldwin Park, 36.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Olive Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 404 students tested.

All students at this school: 33% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 33%, district —, state 39%33%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 31%, district 32%, state 32%31% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 30%, district 33%, state 32%30% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 32%, district 35%, state 44%32% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 34%, district 34%, state 42%34% · +1 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 11%, state 15%10% · −23 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 6%, district 13%, state 11%6% · −27 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 61%, district 69%, state 72%61% · +28 vs school

7 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.8pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +4.6pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 20.5%, district 21.8%, state 18.5%20.5% · +2.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 6.2%, district —, state 3.7%6.2% · +2.6pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.3%
Grades 7–822.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 18:1, district 21:118:1
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience17.6 years
Fully credentialed82%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,803 – $133,806
Principal salary$161,641 – $181,508
Superintendent salary$301,854

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,761, CA average $14,815$26,761 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,078 per student

$1,078 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$23,647 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support13%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,026 per pupil
2019$14,799 per pupil
2018$14,543 per pupil
2017$10,768 per pupil
2016$9,734 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic89.9%
District 89.3% · CA 56.1%
Asian5.7%
District 7.0% · CA 10.2%
White2.3%
District 1.0% · CA 19.9%
Other1.9%
District 2.3% · CA 9.0%
Black0.2%
District 0.4% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 87.6% (24pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$81K · CA $85K
Median home value$609K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population71,082
Median age38 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Olive Middle a good middle school?

Olive Middle has a Scope Score of 37 out of 100, placing it in the 41st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,318 statewide. 12.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.0 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Olive Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 32.9% of students at Olive Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 20.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 922 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Olive Middle rank in California?

Olive Middle ranks #1,318 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 41st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Olive Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Olive Middle decreases by 2.8 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Olive Middle?

20.5% of students at Olive Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 6.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Olive Middle compare to other schools in Baldwin Park?

Olive Middle scores 37/100 (41st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 477 students. Use the schools in Baldwin Park page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Olive Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Olive Middle in Baldwin Park, 36.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Olive Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 3.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (24.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 38.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 404 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
12.9%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 46th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-2.8pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 47th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
32.9%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 45th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
20.5%
↓ vs CA 18.5% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
6.2%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 40th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
23.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 53th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 614510%26%23%40%37%−10
Grade 715815%27%21%37%42%−6
Grade 815710%29%34%28%38%−8
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 614514%12%24%50%26%−9
Grade 715921%15%22%42%36%+2
Grade 81588%11%27%54%19%−13
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/111598%16%65%11%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged40436.6%−4−2
Hispanic/Latino40937.4%−2−1
Students with Disabilities7315.1%+0−2
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Olive Middle ←3712.9%32.9%−2.86.2%
Sierra Vista Middle1.6 mi4313.9%36.9%+1.06.0%
Santa Fe Computer Science Magnet2.7 mi3919.5%37.2%−9.210.3%
Edgewood Middle3 mi3310.5%28.7%−5.01.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20192616#16819.1%31.8%8.2%7.3%-9.9pp
20223955#98111.0%32.9%26.0%5.3%+5.7pp
20234254#100611.3%32.0%22.9%6.7%+4.9pp
20243748#11509.8%34.3%23.2%6.9%-1.6pp
20253741#131812.9%32.9%20.5%6.2%-2.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.6%23.5%+15.9pp
Male8.9%17.0%+8.1pp
Asian0.0%3.3%+3.3pp
Hispanic/Latino8.5%21.2%+12.7pp
Students with Disabilities16.0%30.0%+14.0pp
English Learners18.4%17.4%-1.0pp
Homeless9.4%33.3%+23.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.2%21.9%+12.7pp
All Students8.2%20.6%+12.4pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction