ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Bernardo Heights Middle · San Diego

Bernardo Heights Middle: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Bernardo Heights posts 66% meeting the standard, and 35.1% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

12990 Paseo Lucido, 92128 (opens in new tab)·Poway Unified·San Diego·Grades 6-8·1,487 students·14% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(858) 485-4850·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope6043
% Exceeded35%17%
% Met+66%39%
Growth-1.4+1.5
Absence11.8%18.5%
Suspension2.9%3.7%
Scope Score
60
💪 Strong All-Around · Solid
ranked #308 statewide · #5 of 7 in Poway Unified

Bernardo Heights Middle scores 60 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 86th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

💪 Strong All-Around — Ask about what we don't score — class size, electives, the feel of a classroom — strong numbers everywhere on paper don't mean every classroom feels the same.

Most rating sites would stop at “66% proficient” and call it done. Bernardo Heights deserves a closer read. It sits at the 86th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Bernardo Heights's low-income kids hit 51.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has held the 86th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 66% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 674%71%71%69%73%
Grade 773%76%72%75%74%
Grade 878%72%73%72%74%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 663%55%60%57%60%
Grade 757%56%58%55%59%
Grade 861%48%55%47%56%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

38%
35%
27%
Grade 6 · 73% proficient
33%
41%
26%
Grade 7 · 74% proficient
34%
40%
26%
Grade 8 · 74% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 3.7pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

51.7%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Bernardo Heights's most underrated number

51.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Bernardo Heights low-income: 51.7%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
35.1%
State 16.8%
18.3pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-1.4pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
66.1%
State 39.3%
26.9pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
11.8%
State 18.5%
6.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
2.9%
State 3.7%
0.7pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
33.3%
State 18.0%
15.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Bernardo Heights Middle in San Diego, 51.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 50.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bernardo Heights Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.3% Math proficient); White students (72.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 68.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 207 students tested.

All students at this school: 66% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 66%, district —, state 39%66%
MaleMale: this school 67%, district 70%, state 42%67% · +1 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 65%, district 70%, state 44%65% · −1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 68%, state 56%63% · −3 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 85%, district 87%, state 72%85% · +19 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 49%, district 50%, state 32%49% · −17 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 41%, district 46%, state 32%41% · −25 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 68%, district 71%, state 56%68% · +2 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 26%, district 34%, state 15%26% · −40 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 69%, district 70%, state 65%69% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 11%, district 23%, state 11%11% · −55 vs school
Military-ConnectedMilitary-Connected: this school 52%, district 61%, state 46%52% · −14 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 20%, district 42%, state 26%20% · −46 vs school
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Pacific IslanderPacific Islander: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 0.9pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +1.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 11.8%, district 9.7%, state 18.5%11.8% · −6.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.9%, district —, state 3.7%2.9% · −0.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–69.3%
Grades 7–813.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 23:123:1
Teaching staff71 teachers
Avg. experience13.1 years
Fully credentialed83%
First-year teachers7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$58,959 – $127,725
Principal salary$160,698 – $181,289
Superintendent salary$362,500

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $14,944, CA average $14,815$14,944 · spent at this school
Federal share$236 per student

$236 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,880 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services8%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,246 per pupil
2019$11,959 per pupil
2018$12,266 per pupil
2017$11,181 per pupil
2016$10,952 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White41.5%
District 37.6% · CA 19.9%
Asian21.9%
District 25.5% · CA 10.2%
Other17.9%
District 17.8% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic16.8%
District 17.4% · CA 56.1%
Black1.9%
District 1.6% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 13.8% (50pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$131K · CA $85K
Median home value$927K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+64% · CA 35%
ZIP population48,992
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,487 students, this school is well above the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 60% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bernardo Heights Middle a good middle school?

Bernardo Heights Middle has a Scope Score of 60 out of 100, placing it in the 86th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #308 statewide. 35.1% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 18.3 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Bernardo Heights Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 66.1% of students at Bernardo Heights Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 35.1% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 31.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 35.1% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,839 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Bernardo Heights Middle rank in California?

Bernardo Heights Middle ranks #308 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 86th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Bernardo Heights Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Bernardo Heights Middle decreases by 1.4 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Bernardo Heights Middle?

11.8% of students at Bernardo Heights Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 2.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Bernardo Heights Middle compare to other schools in San Diego?

Bernardo Heights Middle scores 60/100 (86th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,487 students. Use the schools in San Diego page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Bernardo Heights Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Bernardo Heights Middle in San Diego, 51.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 50.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Bernardo Heights Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.3% Math proficient); White students (72.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 68.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 207 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
35.1%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 70th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-1.4pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 48th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
66.1%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 71th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
11.8%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 59th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.9%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 53th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
33.3%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 67th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 647238%35%18%9%73%+27
Grade 747833%41%17%8%74%+27
Grade 847034%40%17%9%74%+28
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 647637%23%24%16%60%+25
Grade 747432%27%25%16%59%+25
Grade 846936%20%23%21%56%+24
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1146829%31%36%5%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20751.7%+1+13
White59672.0%−0+10
Asian31788.0%+0+14
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Bernardo Heights Middle ←6035.1%66.1%−1.42.9%
Meadowbrook Middle2.2 mi4825.7%53.5%−3.72.4%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196188#23634.1%67.8%6.4%2.3%+0.8pp
20225785#31431.4%63.0%15.2%1.4%-3.1pp
20236589#23134.0%64.6%16.2%4.0%-1.6pp
20245885#32831.6%62.4%12.0%2.9%-3.4pp
20256086#30835.1%66.1%11.8%2.9%-1.4pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female7.2%13.3%+6.1pp
Male5.6%10.3%+4.7pp
Asian0.4%5.1%+4.7pp
Black/African American22.2%19.4%-2.8pp
Filipino0.0%
White3.0%4.1%+1.1pp
Hispanic/Latino10.8%16.9%+6.1pp
Two or More Races3.1%10.4%+7.3pp
Students with Disabilities12.8%20.9%+8.1pp
English Learners3.8%21.9%+18.1pp
Homeless25.0%43.8%+18.8pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged14.7%26.2%+11.5pp
All Students6.4%11.7%+5.3pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction