General Grant Middle: Kids show up — absenteeism runs far below the state. But suspensions run 3× the state rate.
General Grant has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 53 | 23% | 57% | +8.4 | 9.4% | 9.5% |
| CA average · Middle School | 43 | 17% | 39% | +1.5 | 18.5% | 3.7% |
General Grant Middle scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 77th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “57% proficient” and call it done. General Grant deserves a closer read. The school sits in Reedley, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
General Grant's low-income kids hit 64.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 77th percentile since 2019.
Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 57% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 47% | 45% | 50% | 52% | 58% |
| Grade 7 | 64% | 60% | 66% | 64% | 75% |
| Grade 8 | 67% | 55% | 60% | 60% | 65% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 47% | 40% | 37% | 41% | 41% |
| Grade 7 | 45% | 33% | 42% | 41% | 54% |
| Grade 8 | 60% | 35% | 43% | 51% | 51% |
The story this school is actually telling
chronic absenteeism — versus 18.5% statewide. Attendance is the quietest strong signal a school can post.
of students were suspended, versus 3.7% statewide — worth asking about on a tour.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 5.6pp across grades; the floor rises 6.9pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
General Grant's most underrated number
64.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask about the discipline philosophy and what a typical suspension is for. Numbers can't tell you whether a campus feels strict or chaotic — a visit can.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At General Grant Middle in Reedley, 64.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. General Grant Middle outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (47.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (65.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 43.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 459 students tested.
7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 8.9pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +6.8pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$1,204 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
On the state's science test (CAST), 25% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is General Grant Middle a good middle school?
What are General Grant Middle's CAASPP test scores?
How does General Grant Middle rank in California?
Is General Grant Middle getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at General Grant Middle?
How does General Grant Middle compare to other schools in Reedley?
How does General Grant Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 59
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 53
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 170 | 17% | 41% | 23% | 19% | 58% | +11 |
| Grade 7 | 160 | 27% | 48% | 18% | 8% | 75% | +27 |
| Grade 8 | 172 | 23% | 42% | 21% | 15% | 65% | +18 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 171 | 20% | 21% | 35% | 24% | 41% | +6 |
| Grade 7 | 164 | 22% | 32% | 24% | 21% | 54% | +20 |
| Grade 8 | 175 | 31% | 20% | 21% | 28% | 51% | +19 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 174 | 7% | 18% | 66% | 10% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 459 | 64.0% | +10 | +26 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 474 | 65.7% | +11 | +27 |
| English Learners | 86 | 23.3% | +4 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Grant Middle ← | — | 53 | 23.2% | 57.2% | +8.4 | 9.5% |
| California average | — | 43 | 16.8% | 39.3% | +1.5 | 3.7% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 57 | 84 | #316 | 23.6% | 55.1% | 2.3% | 2.8% | +16.5pp |
| 2022 | 42 | 62 | #813 | 16.0% | 44.7% | 9.6% | 7.0% | +2.6pp |
| 2023 | 53 | 76 | #533 | 19.8% | 49.6% | 10.2% | 9.2% | +8.0pp |
| 2024 | 51 | 77 | #512 | 19.0% | 51.5% | 10.2% | 12.8% | +8.7pp |
| 2025 | 53 | 77 | #516 | 23.2% | 57.2% | 9.4% | 9.5% | +8.4pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 1.0% | 9.0% | +8.0pp |
| Male | 3.3% | 9.3% | +6.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 2.3% | 8.7% | +6.4pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 4.9% | 16.0% | +11.1pp |
| English Learners | 2.2% | 9.3% | +7.1pp |
| Military-Connected | 0.0% | 15.4% | +15.4pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 2.2% | 9.5% | +7.3pp |
| All Students | 2.2% | 9.1% | +6.9pp |
| Homeless | — | 20.0% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction