School district · Fresno County

Clovis Unified schools

Clovis Unified’s 35 public elementary schools run from the 34th to the 96th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 35 schools

from 34th to 96th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

0Needs Support
3Developing
11Solid
21Strong

Each column counts the schools in one five-percentile step; the number above it is that count.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 7 schools

from 34th to 96th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Granite Ridge Intermediate: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Alta Sierra Intermediate: 92nd percentile, Strong
  • Reyburn Intermediate: 87th percentile, Strong
  • Kastner Intermediate: 83rd percentile, Strong
  • Phillip V. Sanchez Intermediate: 74th percentile, Solid
  • Clark Intermediate: 71st percentile, Solid
  • Enterprise Alternative: 34th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
2Solid
4Strong

High · 5 schools

from 71st to 95th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Clovis North High: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Buchanan High: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Clovis West High: 88th percentile, Strong
  • Clovis High: 80th percentile, Strong
  • Clovis East High: 71st percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
4Strong

Each column counts the schools in one five-percentile step; the number above it is that count. One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 5 schools not ranked statewide

Schools around Clovis Unified

52 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Clovis Unified score highest?

Riverview Elementary is highest, at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Clovis Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 32 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Clovis Unified had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

1 elementary school not ranked statewide
  • Clovis Community Day ElementaryCommunity day school: students are placed here by probation, district or voluntary referral, including after an expulsion, so we don’t rank it

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Clovis Unified score highest?

Granite Ridge Intermediate is highest, at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Clovis Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 4 middle schools
Context

The average middle school in Clovis Unified had 14 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

High schools

Which high schools in Clovis Unified score highest?

Clovis North High is highest, at the 95th percentile.

That’s higher than 95 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Clovis Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 2 high schools
Context

The average high school in Clovis Unified had 17 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100.

4 high schools not ranked statewide

Alternative schools, continuation schools, court and community schools and special education centers enroll students differently from a regular school, so each is compared only with its own kind or not ranked.

  • Clovis Online CharterAlternative school: compared only with other alternative schools
  • Gateway High (Continuation)Continuation high school: compared only with other continuation schools
  • Clovis Community Day SecondaryCommunity day school: students are placed here by probation, district or voluntary referral, including after an expulsion, so we don’t rank it
  • Garfield CenterSpecial education center: students are placed here by an IEP team, not by address and not by lottery, so we don’t rank it

The district

Where does Clovis Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Clovis Unified spent $16,077 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 58 cents of every Clovis Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction58%
  • Instruction support12%
  • Student services12%
  • Administration5%
  • Buildings & maintenance11%
  • Other2%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$773.3 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 63 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 99% of its $780.1 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 294 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 87% of the money. The plan itself puts 82% of it toward staff.

  • On-going Operating Costs $473.5 million
  • Students with IEPs $159.1 million
  • Custodial and Grounds Services $39.5 million
  • 60 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

11 of the plan’s 63 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $5.1 million
  • English learners $2.0 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Summer Intervention Learning Academy$1.8 million
  • ELD teachers at Secondary Schools$1.8 million
  • Secondary Intervention$1.2 million
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $52.9 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $46.7 million and estimates it spent $45.0 million, $1.7 million (4%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $62.9 million (9%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is On-going Operating Costs, which went from $437.1 million to $473.5 million.

Largest increases

  • On-going Operating Costs+⁠$36.4 million
  • Students with IEPs+⁠$18.2 million
  • Custodial and Grounds Services+⁠$2.6 million

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • IMPACT SRL’s$4.1 million
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 368%69%up 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1, 2 and 354%55%up 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 1 and 216 in 10014 in 1002 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoals 1 and 23.9%3.4%down 0.5 pts

Goals 4 and 5 aren’t shown because they track named schools.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • On-going Operating Costs · $473,525,004
  • Students with IEPs · $159,071,766
  • Custodial and Grounds Services · $39,497,111
The full plan5 goals, 69 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($773.3 million).

Where does the money go?

62% to Goal 3. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
  • small actions drawn together

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Maximize Achievement for ALL Students$215.2 million28% of action budgets

36 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $194.0 million (+⁠$21.1 million) · p. 20 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Students with IEPs$159.1 millionaction 1.3 · p. 242 ↗
  2. Instructional and Operational Technology$9.4 millionaction 1.1 · p. 242 ↗
  3. Career Technical Education On-going Operating Costs$6.5 millionaction 1.4 · p. 242 ↗
  4. Career Technical Education Courses$6.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 242 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Counselors to Reduce Caseloads$3.6 millionaction 1.24 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

31 more funded actions in this goal

  • Additional Support for Core Classes and College & Career Success · action 1.12 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$3.2 million
  • Class Size Reduction II · action 1.36 · p. 245 ↗$3.0 million
  • Instructional Supplemental Support for Sites · action 1.8 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.7 million
  • Class Size Reduction · action 1.2 · p. 242 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.4 million
  • Behavior Consultation Team · action 1.30 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$2.1 million
  • Summer Intervention Learning Academy · action 1.10 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.8 million
  • ELD teachers at Secondary Schools · action 1.15 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.8 million
  • Comprehensive Youth Services · action 1.26 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.4 million
  • Mental Health Support Providers · action 1.31 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • Personnel for SSSA for Foster & Homeless Support · action 1.23 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • Secondary Intervention · action 1.13 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.2 million
  • Push-In for K-6 Teachers · action 1.11 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.1 million
  • Elementary Social-Emotional Support · action 1.33 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Opportunity Classes at Intermediate · action 1.19 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Computer-Based Data Management System · action 1.29 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • Additional Nursing Services · action 1.22 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • Administrative Support for MTSS · action 1.27 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.8 million
  • Lead Psychologists and Support for Comprehensive Wellness Project · action 1.32 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
  • Additional Academic Intervention · action 1.35 · p. 245 ↗$0.6 million
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) · action 1.28 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Enrichment Supplemental Support for Sites · action 1.9 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • CSI Support · action 1.20 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • GIS & SRLs for At-Risk Students · action 1.25 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Specialized Services and Support for Multilingual English Learner Students · action 1.7 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Healthy Start Coordinator · action 1.14 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Increased Bus Routes · action 1.17 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Online Curriculum for Intervention & Credit Recovery · action 1.16 · p. 243 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Mentoring Services at Alternative Sites · action 1.18 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Licensing to Provide Online College and Career Planning · action 1.6 · p. 242 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • LTEL Support · action 1.34 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Multilingual EL Summer School · action 1.21 · p. 244 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Students with IEPs+⁠$18.2 million$140.8 million → $159.1 million · p. 242 ↗
  2. Instructional and Operational Technology−⁠$1.8 million$11.2 million → $9.4 million · p. 242 ↗
  3. Summer Intervention Learning Academy+⁠$0.9 million$0.9 million → $1.8 million · p. 243 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Career Technical Education On-going Operating Costs · $6.4 million → $6.5 million · p. 242 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Career Technical Education Courses · $5.7 million → $6.2 million · p. 242 ↗+⁠$0.5 million
  • Counselors to Reduce Caseloads · $3.1 million → $3.6 million · p. 244 ↗+⁠$0.5 million
  • Additional Support for Core Classes and College & Career Success · $3.2 million → $3.2 million · p. 243 ↗−⁠$32,843
  • Class Size Reduction II · $2.7 million → $3.0 million · p. 245 ↗+⁠$0.3 million
  • Instructional Supplemental Support for Sites · $2.3 million → $2.7 million · p. 243 ↗+⁠$0.4 million
  • Class Size Reduction · $2.1 million → $2.4 million · p. 242 ↗+⁠$0.3 million
  • Behavior Consultation Team · $1.7 million → $2.1 million · p. 245 ↗+⁠$0.4 million
  • ELD teachers at Secondary Schools · $1.7 million → $1.8 million · p. 243 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Comprehensive Youth Services · $1.4 million → $1.4 million · p. 244 ↗−⁠$2,758
  • Mental Health Support Providers · $1.2 million → $1.3 million · p. 245 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Personnel for SSSA for Foster & Homeless Support · $1.1 million → $1.3 million · p. 244 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Secondary Intervention · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 243 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Push-In for K-6 Teachers · $1.1 million → $1.1 million · p. 243 ↗+⁠$20,324
  • Elementary Social-Emotional Support · $0.9 million → $1.0 million · p. 245 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Opportunity Classes at Intermediate · $0.9 million → $1.0 million · p. 244 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Computer-Based Data Management System · $438,071 → $825,924 · p. 245 ↗+⁠$387,853
  • Additional Nursing Services · $753,338 → $815,640 · p. 244 ↗+⁠$62,302
  • Administrative Support for MTSS · $734,962 → $798,241 · p. 245 ↗+⁠$63,279
  • Lead Psychologists and Support for Comprehensive Wellness Project · $330,003 → $569,227 · p. 245 ↗+⁠$239,224
  • Additional Academic Intervention · $586,186 → $568,764 · p. 245 ↗−⁠$17,422
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) · $377,538 → $412,215 · p. 245 ↗+⁠$34,677
  • Enrichment Supplemental Support for Sites · $234,413 → $274,920 · p. 243 ↗+⁠$40,507
  • CSI Support · $269,094 → $206,276 · p. 244 ↗−⁠$62,818
  • GIS & SRLs for At-Risk Students · $162,287 · p. 244 ↗new or renamed
  • Specialized Services and Support for Multilingual English Learner Students · $45,562 → $126,415 · p. 243 ↗+⁠$80,853
  • Healthy Start Coordinator · $101,028 → $109,921 · p. 243 ↗+⁠$8,893
  • Increased Bus Routes · $97,000 → $97,000 · p. 244 ↗unchanged
  • Online Curriculum for Intervention & Credit Recovery · $95,000 → $95,000 · p. 243 ↗unchanged
  • Mentoring Services at Alternative Sites · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 244 ↗unchanged
  • Licensing to Provide Online College and Career Planning · $45,852 → $45,852 · p. 242 ↗unchanged
  • LTEL Support · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 245 ↗unchanged
  • Multilingual EL Summer School · $18,808 → $19,748 · p. 244 ↗+⁠$940

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 24 measures · 3 quoted

  • Smarter Balanced ELA Met or Exceeded p. 20 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 66.2% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 70% …
  • Smarter Balanced Math Met or Exceeded p. 21 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 51.0% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 55% …
  • Local Math Assessment p. 22 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 37% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 41% …

21 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Operate with Increasing Efficiency and Effectiveness$79.9 million10% of action budgets

19 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $75.1 million (+⁠$4.7 million) · p. 75 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Custodial and Grounds Services$39.5 millionaction 2.1 · p. 245 ↗
  2. Maintenance & Repair of School Facilities$20.7 millionaction 2.2 · p. 245 ↗
  3. Aligned Instructional Materials & Supplies$5.8 millionaction 2.4 · p. 246 ↗
  4. IMPACT SRL’s$4.1 millionaction 2.9 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. IMPACT LD’s$1.6 millionaction 2.12 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

14 more funded actions in this goal

  • IMPACT Directors · action 2.10 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • IMPACT Counselors · action 2.11 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.3 million
  • VAPA Support · action 2.7 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.0 million
  • Chronic Absenteeism Support · action 2.18 · p. 247 ↗$0.9 million
  • Supplemental Resources · action 2.5 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • Student Health Center · action 2.3 · p. 245 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • Increased Access to Technology · action 2.6 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
  • Increase Connection Points to School · action 2.8 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.6 million
  • Elementary Suspension Support · action 2.15 · p. 246 ↗$0.3 million
  • Diverse Student Engagement and Support · action 2.13 · p. 246 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Middle School Suspension Support · action 2.16 · p. 247 ↗$0.2 million
  • High School Suspension Support · action 2.17 · p. 247 ↗$0.2 million
  • African American Suspension Support · action 2.14 · p. 246 ↗$0.1 million
  • Technical Assistance Support to Reduce Suspension Rates · action 2.19 · p. 247 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Custodial and Grounds Services+⁠$2.6 million$36.9 million → $39.5 million · p. 245 ↗
  2. Maintenance & Repair of School Facilities+⁠$0.7 million$20.1 million → $20.7 million · p. 245 ↗
  3. Aligned Instructional Materials & Supplies+⁠$0.2 million$5.6 million → $5.8 million · p. 246 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • IMPACT SRL’s · $4.1 million · p. 246 ↗new or renamed
  • IMPACT LD’s · $1.6 million · p. 246 ↗new or renamed
  • IMPACT Directors · $1.3 million · p. 246 ↗new or renamed
  • IMPACT Counselors · $1.3 million · p. 246 ↗new or renamed
  • VAPA Support · $894,655 → $963,733 · p. 246 ↗+⁠$69,078
  • Chronic Absenteeism Support · $882,616 → $899,325 · p. 247 ↗+⁠$16,709
  • Supplemental Resources · $723,680 → $723,680 · p. 246 ↗unchanged
  • Student Health Center · $670,860 → $719,912 · p. 245 ↗+⁠$49,052
  • Increased Access to Technology · $500,000 → $600,000 · p. 246 ↗+⁠$100,000
  • Increase Connection Points to School · $595,000 → $595,379 · p. 246 ↗+⁠$379
  • Elementary Suspension Support · $300,000 → $300,000 · p. 246 ↗unchanged
  • Diverse Student Engagement and Support · $272,068 → $285,495 · p. 246 ↗+⁠$13,427
  • Middle School Suspension Support · $200,000 → $200,000 · p. 247 ↗unchanged
  • High School Suspension Support · $200,000 → $200,000 · p. 247 ↗unchanged
  • African American Suspension Support · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 246 ↗unchanged
  • Technical Assistance Support to Reduce Suspension Rates · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 247 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 23 measures · 3 quoted

  • Smarter Balanced ELA Met or Exceeded p. 75 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 66.2% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 70% …
  • Smarter Balanced Math Met or Exceeded p. 76 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 51.0% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 55% …
  • Local Math Assessment p. 77 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 37% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 41% …

20 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Hire, Develop, Sustain, and Value a High-Quality, Diverse Workforce$477.6 million62% of action budgets

2 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $440.6 million (+⁠$37.0 million) · p. 115 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. On-going Operating Costs$473.5 millionaction 3.1 · p. 247 ↗
  2. Professional Development$4.1 millionaction 3.2 · p. 247 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. On-going Operating Costs+⁠$36.4 million$437.1 million → $473.5 million · p. 247 ↗
  2. Professional Development+⁠$0.6 million$3.5 million → $4.1 million · p. 247 ↗

How the plan measures it · 14 measures · 3 quoted

  • Smarter Balanced ELA Met or Exceeded p. 115 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 66.2% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 70% …
  • Smarter Balanced Math Met or Exceeded p. 116 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 51.0% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 55% …
  • Local Math Assessment p. 117 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 37% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 41% …

11 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalMaximize Achievement for ALL Students at Gateway High School Over the upcoming three years, Gateway aims to…$313,499under 1% of action budgets

“Maximize Achievement for ALL Students at Gateway High School Over the upcoming three years, Gateway aims to enhance academic achievement for all students, with a specific focus on LI students, targeting an increase of 5% in proficiency levels in English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics and distance from standard, as measured by SBAC results, along with progress monitoring through local benchmark assessments. Over the upcoming three years, Gateway aims to enhance academic achievement for all students, with a specific focus on LI students and Hispanic students. It targets an increase of 3% in proficiency levels on the College and Career Dashboard Indicator for LI and Hispanic students. As we move into year two of our plan and revisit the Red indicators on the Dashboard, we will be adding a focus for our new Reds on the Dashboard: graduation rates for Hispanic students at Gateway. Our goal is to increase graduation rates for Hispanic by 3%. 2023 Reds: All Students: ELA, Math, and CCI, Gateway High School SED: ELA, Math, and CCI, Gateway High School Hispanic: CCI, Gateway High School 2024 Reds: Hispanic: Graduation, Gateway High School 2025 Reds: All Students: ELA & Math SED: ELA & Math” p. 124 ↗

3 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Additional Academic Support$220,000action 4.3 · p. 247 ↗
  2. Professional Development$60,000action 4.2 · p. 247 ↗
  3. Instructional Supplemental Resources$33,499action 4.1 · p. 247 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Additional Academic Support+⁠$145,730$74,270 → $220,000 · p. 247 ↗
  2. Instructional Supplemental Resources−⁠$134,626$168,125 → $33,499 · p. 247 ↗
  3. Professional Development+⁠$30,000$30,000 → $60,000 · p. 247 ↗

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 124 ↗.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalMaximize Engagement for ALL Students at Clovis Community Day School (CCDS) Elementary, Clovis Community Day…$353,157under 1% of action budgets

“Maximize Engagement for ALL Students at Clovis Community Day School (CCDS) Elementary, Clovis Community Day School (CCDS) Secondary, and Gateway High School. Over the next three years, Clovis Community Day School Secondary and Gateway will reduce suspension rates for all students, particularly among CCDS Secondary White by 5% CCDS Secondary SED by 5% CCDS Secondary Hispanic by 5% Gateway all students by 5% Gateway Hispanic students by 5% Gateway EL students by 5% Gateway FY students by 7% Gateway SED students by 5% Gateway SWD students by 5% Over the next three years, Clovis Community Day School Secondary and Gateway will reduce chronic absenteeism among CCDS Secondary, SED students by 5% Clovis Community Day School Elementary will reduce chronic absenteeism by 5% and suspension rate by 5%. This goal will also address the following Reds on the 2024 Dashboard: CCDS, Secondary, All Students, suspension rate & chronic absenteeism rate CCDS, Secondary, Hispanic, chronic absenteeism rate CCDS, Secondary, SED, suspension rate & chronic absenteeism rate CCDS, Secondary, White, suspension rate Gateway, All Students, suspension rate & chronic absenteeism rate Gateway, Hispanic, suspension rate Gateway, SED, suspension rate & chronic absenteeism rate Gateway, EL, suspension rate Gateway, SWD, suspension rate By June 2027, Gateway High School and Clovis Community Day School (CCDS) will improve student outcomes by reducing suspension rates and chronic absenteeism through targeted” p. 135 ↗

3 funded actions · reworded since the 2025–26 plan

Largest funded actions

  1. Additional Social-Emotional and Behavioral Support$218,932action 5.3 · p. 248 ↗
  2. Enrichment Resources$120,225action 5.1 · p. 248 ↗
  3. Professional Development$14,000action 5.2 · p. 248 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Enrichment Resources+⁠$69,503$50,722 → $120,225 · p. 248 ↗
  2. Additional Social-Emotional and Behavioral Support−⁠$22,929$241,861 → $218,932 · p. 248 ↗
  3. Professional Development−⁠$21,841$35,841 → $14,000 · p. 248 ↗

How the plan measures it · 2 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 135 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 43,669 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 42%2. White: 30%3. Asian: 16%4. Two or more races: 5%5. Black or African American: 3%6. Filipino: 2%7. Not reported: 1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino42%
  2. White30%
  3. Asian16%
  4. Two or more races5%
  5. Black or African American3%
  6. Filipino2%
  7. Not reported1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

47%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 20,481 of 43,611 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Clovis Unified extra help in 2026. A student group had the Dashboard’s lowest results (red) on two or more measures three years in a row.

It also qualified the year before.

Which students, on which measures

Foster youth
math and suspensions
Students with disabilities
English and math

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 58% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (873 of 1,518 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

5 schools getting state support, 2025–26

5 in targeted support

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Clovis Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Riverview Elementary, 96th percentile (Strong). Middle: Granite Ridge Intermediate, 96th percentile (Strong). High: Clovis North High, 95th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Clovis Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Clovis Unified good?

Clovis Unified’s 35 public elementary schools run from the 34th to the 96th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 21 Strong, 11 Solid and 3 Developing. Clovis Unified’s 7 public middle schools run from the 34th to the 96th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong, 2 Solid and 1 Developing. Clovis Unified’s 5 public high schools run from the 71st to the 95th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 4 Strong and 1 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Clovis Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Clovis Unified had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in Clovis Unified had 14 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. The average high school in Clovis Unified had 17 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California high school we score had 22 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Clovis Unified spend per student?

Clovis Unified spent $16,077 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 58 cents of every Clovis Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Clovis Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $773.3 million into 63 funded actions in 5 goals, 99% of its $780.1 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $477.6 million, 62% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Clovis Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.