ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En · Los Angeles

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En: English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But this year's 8th graders test below its 6th graders.

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.

Alternative school — serves students who benefit from a non-traditional educational setting. Scores are not directly comparable to comprehensive schools.
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5843
% Exceeded34%17%
% Met+59%39%
Growth-17.6+1.5
Absence18.2%18.5%
Suspension1.7%3.7%
Scope Score
58
🌱 Building Momentum · Solid
ranked #365 statewide · #23 of 226 in Los Angeles Unified

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En scores 58 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 84th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “59% proficient” and call it done. Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En deserves a closer read. It sits at the 84th percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En's low-income kids hit 52.7% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Climbed from the 71st to the 84th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 middle schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 59% of students meet the standard today, above the 44% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 641%54%57%59%75%
Grade 745%52%55%54%61%
Grade 854%57%50%53%58%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 635%38%42%47%65%
Grade 739%37%39%48%48%
Grade 850%42%46%46%47%

The story this school is actually telling

The on-ramp · English learner progress
29.7%

of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

↑ how fast newcomers reach fluency
The trajectory · grade 6→8
17.6pp

proficiency runs 70% in this year's grade 6 against 53% in its grade 8. The state average falls by −0.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

45%
30%
25%
Grade 6 · 75% proficient
28%
33%
39%
Grade 7 · 61% proficient
24%
34%
42%
Grade 8 · 58% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 20.5pp across grades; the floor slips 17.3pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. The school's 8th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 6th graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

52.7%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En's most underrated number

52.7% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En low-income: 52.7%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
33.6%
State 16.8%
16.8pp above state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-17.6pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
59.2%
State 39.3%
19.9pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.2%
State 18.5%
0.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.7%
State 3.7%
1.9pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
29.7%
State 18.0%
11.8pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 6 and grade 8. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En in Los Angeles, 52.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En outperforms its district average for low-income students by 11.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (54.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 550 students tested.

All students at this school: 58% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 58%, district —, state 39%58%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 46%, district 36%, state 32%46% · −12 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 48%, district 36%, state 32%48% · −11 vs school
MaleMale: this school 61%, district 41%, state 42%61% · +2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 55%, district 42%, state 44%55% · −3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 83%, district 65%, state 56%83% · +25 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 27%, district 14%, state 15%27% · −32 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 68%, district 56%, state 56%68% · +10 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 52%, district 70%, state 65%52% · −7 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 4%, district 9%, state 11%4% · −55 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 100%, district 78%, state 72%100% · +42 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: too few students to report‹11
American Indian/Alaska NativeAmerican Indian/Alaska Native: too few students to report‹11
Foster YouthFoster Youth: too few students to report‹11
HomelessHomeless: too few students to report‹11
this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 14.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -0.3pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.2%, district 24.5%, state 18.5%18.2% · −0.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.7%, district —, state 3.7%1.7% · −1.9pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–614.6%
Grades 7–819.5%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff52 teachers
Avg. experience11.8 years
Fully credentialed46%
First-year teachers2%
Intern / emergency permit4.6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $24,126, CA average $14,815$24,126 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$1,567 per student

$1,567 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic66.6%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White19.8%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Other9.0%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Black2.8%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Asian1.8%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$95K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.09M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+42% · CA 35%
ZIP population44,658
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 43% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En a good middle school?

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En has a Scope Score of 58 out of 100, placing it in the 84th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #365 statewide. 33.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 16.8 percentage points above the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 59.2% of students at Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 33.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 33.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,751 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En rank in California?

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En ranks #365 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 84th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En decreases by 17.6 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En?

18.2% of students at Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 1.7%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En compare to other schools in Los Angeles?

Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En scores 58/100 (84th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En in Los Angeles, 52.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En outperforms its district average for low-income students by 11.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (40.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (54.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.3 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 550 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
33.6%
↑ vs CA 16.8% · 69th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-17.6pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 49th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
59.2%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 66th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.2%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 50th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.7%
↑ vs CA 3.7% · 58th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
29.7%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 624345%30%15%10%75%+29
Grade 735528%33%19%19%61%+14
Grade 827924%34%22%20%58%+12
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 624444%21%17%18%65%+30
Grade 735127%21%21%31%48%+14
Grade 827933%15%22%30%47%+15
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1128017%26%48%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged55052.7%+12+15
Hispanic/Latino54854.9%+14+16
White20586.3%+17+25
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Washington Irving Middle School Math, Music and En ←5833.6%59.2%−17.61.7%
Thomas Starr King Middle School Film and Media Mag2.7 mi5127.1%50.0%+2.30.6%
Woodrow Wilson Middle2.6 mi5019.0%45.3%+8.15.5%
Theodore Roosevelt Middle1.4 mi4618.6%40.5%+0.810.3%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20194971#57717.2%44.0%22.9%1.3%+13.6pp
20224570#64919.3%46.6%34.7%0.7%+3.3pp
20234867#71519.8%48.1%22.5%0.9%-1.3pp
20245277#49825.9%51.3%22.6%0.5%-3.4pp
20255884#36533.6%59.2%18.2%1.7%-17.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female22.1%19.2%-2.9pp
Male23.7%17.4%-6.3pp
Asian11.1%4.3%-6.8pp
Black/African American48.3%45.5%-2.8pp
White23.1%2.6%-20.5pp
Hispanic/Latino21.5%22.1%+0.6pp
Students with Disabilities36.0%28.0%-8.0pp
English Learners30.1%27.5%-2.6pp
Homeless44.0%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged23.7%24.0%+0.3pp
All Students23.0%18.2%-4.8pp
Filipino25.0%
Two or More Races2.9%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction