ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Theodore Roosevelt Middle

Middle School
Composite Score
out of 100
State Percentile
of middle schools
State Rank
of 1,714 California middle schools
🌱
Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself.

Composite scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data from the California Dept. of Education (CAASPP, chronic absenteeism, suspension rates). They are not official CDE ratings and should not be the sole basis for school decisions. See methodology.

School overview

Enrollment
818 students
Student-Teacher Ratio
21:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
78%
Teachers
39 full-time

Dashboard indicators

ELA Year-over-Year
Increased
+5.0 pts DFS change
Math Year-over-Year
Maintained
+2.9 pts DFS change
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
19.6%
English learners at Level 4 (Well Developed) · 225 tested

Data source: California School Dashboard 2025, ELPAC 2024

Student demographics

Hispanic43.1%
White46.7%
Asian1.8%
Black1.3%
Other7.0%

Performance breakdown

Performance breakdown for Theodore Roosevelt Middle
CategoryPercentage
Exceeded Standard18.6%
Met Standard21.9%
Below Standard59.5%

What other rankings don't show you

Most rating sites report "41% proficient" for Theodore Roosevelt Middle and stop there. Here's what that number hides:

18.6% of students exceeded standard while 21.9% met it. That exceeded rate is near the state average of 17.3%. That's 12.4 points below the Glendale Unified district average of 31.0%. The 4 nearby schools within ~3 miles average 25.7% exceeded — 7.1 points higher. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Students here improve by 0.8 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth, suggesting the school is adding value beyond what students arrive with.

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased and Math maintained year-over-year. 19.6% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism is 17.9%, better than the state average of 19.3%.

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters →

Key metrics

% Exceeded Standard
18.6%
Students scoring above proficient
% Met or Above
40.5%
Students meeting standard
Growth (G6→G8)
+0.8pp
Change in proficiency rate
Chronic Absenteeism
17.9%
Students missing 10%+ of days
Suspension Rate
10.4%
Students suspended at least once
Total Tested
1,634
Across all grades & subjects

Grade trajectory

ELA Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8
Math Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th11420.2%28.1%16.7%35.1%48.3%
7th34519.7%32.8%22.9%24.6%52.5%
8th34218.7%29.8%21.1%30.4%48.5%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th12114.1%14.1%28.1%43.8%28.1%
7th36120.5%15.8%26.9%36.8%36.3%
8th35118.5%10.8%25.1%45.6%29.3%
K-12 Feeder PathBoundary data

Feeder patterns derived from 2015-16 NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries may have changed. Contact your school district for current information.

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog